Ok, seriously. Left and right I am seeing people saying “don’t complain” or “stop whining about this and that.”
What is the mentality behind this? You may see it as complaining, but I see it as a perfectly logical point (ok, some of them >_>) that people are pointing out, that in their opinion is unfair or unbalanced.
They’re alright to do this you know, because that is how games get better.
You might not see anything wrong with the boltshot, or with the DMR, or active camo, but that doesn’t mean somebody else will think the same as you will. There are those who believe that, as it stands, the DMR is the only logical weapon to use. Thats actually fairly true.
To those who will say “Oh, well I beat DMR users all the time.” Well answer me this, if there was one of you with the DMR, and one of you with the BR (being the same person, skill level and mentality of playstyle) then who would win? I can honestly tell you it probably wouldn’t be the battle rifle.
Assuming you play equally well and play equally skilled opponents in both games, you would almost definitely get more kills with the DMR. Why? Range. It has more range, aim assist, magnetism and firerate than any of the other weapons.
To me, this is a problem that should be pointed out. The DMR should not be able to beat the BR in the BR’s respective range. Does it always? No, but as it is, if you have a 100% accurate player with a BR, vs a 100% accurate person with a DMR, at close range, and you shoot at the same time, the DMR WILL win.
That’s a problem. The BR should win because it is the BRs respective range. It doesn’t matter that the BR has more aim assist in its respective range, because a good DMR user will be able to 5 shot you anyway.
Why should I not point that out as a problem?
How about the excessive amount of aim assist and magnetism on weapons? I’ve posted this a couple times, but at the DMR’s max sticky reticle range, you can aim completely off the person (reticle not touching, also blue) and still register a shot, and you will get a 5-6 shot kill. Now that is at the DMRs max STICKY RETICLE range, which is much, much farther than the BRs.
How abou the fact that I can aim a mongoose length off of a person with a detached turret, and still be on the sticky reticle?
How about that curving mid air sticky detonator, even though your reticle isn’t even touching him?
I see all of these as problems. Why should I not be able to point this out? Why are some of you guys against pointing this out? It baffles me.
How about that broken join in progress system? The terrible kill cams?
How about the boltshot? A 1 hit kill shotgun secondary, with the capability to down a man at ranges outside of those of a scatter shot?
I don’t like these things. Why can I not point these out and say “Hey, what on earth is going on here?”?
I don’t understand why it is such a bad thing that I should complain about things that to me look so broken. Thats not to say that you find them broken, but I do.
tl;dr: I honestly can’t sum that up without missing most of the major points, so if you’d like to contribute, you have a bit of reading to do, sorry.
That’s just my outlook on the waypoint situation, and a bit of my thoughts on Halo 4.
