> > > Reach has a population of 100,000 people daily. Halo 4 will go above that easily. 1-50 causing a game to flop is like saying halo is built around mlg. Nothing but opinions. Halo 4 will be a top played game
> >
> > 100,000 not much compared to any other online game or older halo games hm wonder why oh yeah no ranking system and loadouts duh
>
> Actually, Halo: Reach has about 300,000 to 600,000 dailey
population at a given time wise lolz
Still top 5 live activity after 2 years. Looks like the complete opposite of a failure for me.
> > > > Reach has a population of 100,000 people daily. Halo 4 will go above that easily. 1-50 causing a game to flop is like saying halo is built around mlg. Nothing but opinions. Halo 4 will be a top played game
> > >
> > > 100,000 not much compared to any other online game or older halo games hm wonder why oh yeah no ranking system and loadouts duh
> >
> > Actually, Halo: Reach has about 300,000 to 600,000 dailey
>
> population at a given time wise lolz
We only know popualtions dailey. Between daytime it gets about 100,000 to 200,000
> > > > > > > > 1-50 ranking system = epic fail
> > > > > > > > simple as this the game will flop without a xp type system no what anyone post or says.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wow, it’s that easy to make a comment that has no basis and suddenly makes me right!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just the facts
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know right?
> > > > > > javascript:__doPostBack(‘ctl00$MainContent$forum$ctl03$PostReply’,’’)
> > > > > > Whatever I say is now fact because you’re wrong no matter what you say. What a wonderful thought process this is!
> > > > >
> > > > > im gonna be honest u confused me but if ur against what i posted then ur wrong so just go away
> > > >
> > > > No you’re wrong brah. Deal with it.
> > >
> > > im not wrong “Brah” lol trying to act hard on the internet ur COOL not… anyway reach is my proof whats urs? oh ur proof is only opinion and mines a fact yeah what i thought
> >
> > How about you read that reply I made toward that other guy who’s on your side? Yeah, that’s as much proof as reach is.
> >
> > Oh, and you wrong brah.
>
> im offically an idiot lol
Now you’ve got it!
> > > > > Reach has a population of 100,000 people daily. Halo 4 will go above that easily. 1-50 causing a game to flop is like saying halo is built around mlg. Nothing but opinions. Halo 4 will be a top played game
> > > >
> > > > 100,000 not much compared to any other online game or older halo games hm wonder why oh yeah no ranking system and loadouts duh
> > >
> > > Actually, Halo: Reach has about 300,000 to 600,000 dailey
> >
> > population at a given time wise lolz
>
> We only know popualtions dailey. Between daytime it gets about 100,000 to 200,000
Actually, Halo: Reach has about 300,000 to 600,000 dailey
where’d that come from then? haha, and i’m sure halo 4 will be at 1 million on the opening weekend if not more
> > > > > > Reach has a population of 100,000 people daily. Halo 4 will go above that easily. 1-50 causing a game to flop is like saying halo is built around mlg. Nothing but opinions. Halo 4 will be a top played game
> > > > >
> > > > > 100,000 not much compared to any other online game or older halo games hm wonder why oh yeah no ranking system and loadouts duh
> > > >
> > > > Actually, Halo: Reach has about 300,000 to 600,000 dailey
> > >
> > > population at a given time wise lolz
> >
> > We only know popualtions dailey. Between daytime it gets about 100,000 to 200,000
>
> Actually, Halo: Reach has about 300,000 to 600,000 dailey
>
> where’d that come from then? haha, and i’m sure halo 4 will be at 1 million on the opening weekend if not more
Proof Halo 3’s population compared to Halo: Reach’s.
I can guarente Halo 4 will get about 4-5 million players a 5 days.
> Halo 3 grossed $170 in first week. Halo Reach surpassed that at $200. Plus there is a lot more people on live now then there was when Halo 3 came out. Halo 4 will outsell Halo Reach and Halo 3. For every critic there’s a fan, i enjoyed the 1-50 ranking on halo 2, but not halo 3. I was a btb person though, and getting up to 47s would run you into boosters and stuff. Guess we’ll just have to wait till 11/6/2012, i think it will surpass games regardless, and maybe the changes will add more depth, instead of halo 3.5. Stay classy guys! I’m out 
I like how your post has been thoughtfully missed by the OP. It’s like he can’t respond to it. He’s just letting his own prejudices dictate his thought patterns.
> > > > > > > Reach has a population of 100,000 people daily. Halo 4 will go above that easily. 1-50 causing a game to flop is like saying halo is built around mlg. Nothing but opinions. Halo 4 will be a top played game
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 100,000 not much compared to any other online game or older halo games hm wonder why oh yeah no ranking system and loadouts duh
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually, Halo: Reach has about 300,000 to 600,000 dailey
> > > >
> > > > population at a given time wise lolz
> > >
> > > We only know popualtions dailey. Between daytime it gets about 100,000 to 200,000
> >
> > Actually, Halo: Reach has about 300,000 to 600,000 dailey
> >
> > where’d that come from then? haha, and i’m sure halo 4 will be at 1 million on the opening weekend if not more
>
> Proof Halo 3’s population compared to Halo: Reach’s.
>
> I can guarente Halo 4 will get about 4-5 million players a 5 days.
It’ll be interesting to see how it all plays out, it’ll sale though b/c it’s halo
> simple as this the game will flop without a 1-50 type system no matter what anyone post or says.
You want a 1-50 system? Go play Halo 3. Simple as this.
agreed
> lol really dude the old idk what to say so im gonna correct ur grammer? idc about grammer on the internet im not writing a paper or anything i just told you how it was and u had nothing to say LOLOLOL
You know, good grammar is as important on internet as it’s anywhere in life. On internet, your grammar is the only thing people can judge you on. If you have a bad grammar, no one can take you seriously. So, as much as I disagree with Neo Kaiser on pretty much anything, your lack of care towards your grammar makes you seem unintelligent and childish. So, if you want people to take you seriously, you should pay attention to your grammar and attitude. That’s not really a hard thing to do.
XP system alone ala Gears of War 3 or CoD is a total failure for competitive matching, but 1-50 ranking system is totally overrated. It’s simple, and okay I guess. But you’re just smokin the nostalgia blunt as of now if you think that this system is the most competent one for competitive matchmaking.
Halo CE had no ranking system, I am not sure why it has become such an integral part of Halo when in reality it means nothing.
You can still play competitively without it, yes some people enjoy ranking up, but the specific system argument isn’t necessary. I play the game for game play, I don’t mind a skill ranking system along with XP as long as it is not 1-50 or similar to it.
Something new and better.
> XP system alone ala Gears of War 3 or CoD is a total failure for competitive matching
Because visual ranks utterly disconnected from TrueSkill operating behind the scenes to find and match players of similar skill aren’t disconnected and are in fact completely connected? To the point where the game doesn’t match players on their skill but by how much time they’ve played?
> But you’re just smokin the nostalgia blunt as of now if you think that this system is the most competent one for competitive matchmaking.
Gonna take a stab. You think ELO was better?
MARKED AS OPINION
A ranking system will improve Halo 4s population fairl dramatically, and give the game a longer life, but it isn’t going to be the make or break factors.
I know quite a few people that won’t play it without an improved ranking system in comparison to Reach. I think most of you will be surprised how many players did leave the Halo franchise after Reach.
Reach didn’t last two years on the MLG circuit.
Halo 3 sold 14.5 million copies over its life span. Reach is at about 8.2 million. Sorry guys, but Reach is already becoming a dead game and Halo 4 isn’t even out yet. There is quite enough proof just there that Halo 4 would benefit greatly from a ranking system.
Really hope 343 delivers to us!
> > Halo 3 grossed $170 in first week. Halo Reach surpassed that at $200. Plus there is a lot more people on live now then there was when Halo 3 came out. Halo 4 will outsell Halo Reach and Halo 3. For every critic there’s a fan, i enjoyed the 1-50 ranking on halo 2, but not halo 3. I was a btb person though, and getting up to 47s would run you into boosters and stuff. Guess we’ll just have to wait till 11/6/2012, i think it will surpass games regardless, and maybe the changes will add more depth, instead of halo 3.5. Stay classy guys! I’m out
>
> I like how your post has been thoughtfully missed by the OP. It’s like he can’t respond to it. He’s just letting his own prejudices dictate his thought patterns.
ill reply to it yeah grossed more the first week after that downhill id rather run into booster than people who suck and got the highest rank
> simple as this the game will flop without a 1-50 type system no matter what anyone post or says.
Probably the most childish thing you could ever say. “I’m right and you’re not because I said so no matter what you say!”
Anyway, CoD’s XP ranking system would like to talk about that flopping. The only thing that sucked about Reach’s XP system was that the armory was tied to your rank. As long as the armory system isn’t linked to your rank then I really could not care less.
1-50 doesn’t NEED to return. The only thing that needs to return is the game matching people up against similar opponents. Reach was the only game to REALLLY screwed that up. And 1-50 isn’t needed for people to be matched up properly. If Ranked returns their really only needs to be like maybe 4 ranked playlists. Team Slayer, Team Objective, Doubles, MLG anything else works better in social. I see a ton of guests in SWAT so that wouldn’t be a smart move so maybe Team Snipers would work. Either way like I said before it isn’t really needed. It couldn’t hurt to not have it but the game won’t instantly suck because it’s not their.
> 1-50 doesn’t NEED to return. The only thing that needs to return is the game matching people up against similar opponents. Reach was the only game to REALLLY screwed that up. And 1-50 isn’t needed for people to be matched up properly. If Ranked returns their really only needs to be like maybe 4 ranked playlists. Team Slayer, Team Objective, Doubles, MLG anything else works better in social. I see a ton of guests in SWAT so that wouldn’t be a smart move so maybe Team Snipers would work. Either way like I said before it isn’t really needed. It couldn’t hurt to not have it but the game won’t instantly suck because it’s not their.
Nobody is saying the game will be bad without 1-50, we’re saying that we won’t play it without it. It was something nice to work for that keeps you around trying to get it higher and higher for each playlist and once you get there you get to start playing the best of the best. In halo reach there is nothing to work for and that’s why it is boring. Please don’t say aren either becuse that is 1 playlist that to this day is still extremely broken. Hence the population of about 50.