It seems to me that the main problem with halo 4 is that it isn’t like the old game, so i was thinking about this then realised if halo 4 would of been a halo 3 remake with a few extra guns wouldn’t everyone complain it was just halo 3.5?
I’m saying this because when i used the play Call Of Duty, the main problem was “It’s the same game every year” now i’m sure alot of you didn’t buy any of the recent CoD games for this reason, i know i did, but alot of you are also wanting for halo to be the same game every year or so, whats up with that?
Are you ever going to make up your minds? Did halo reunite east and west germany, i don’t think so.
Every time a new Halo comes out with tons of new additions to the gameplay there will be those who complain that Halo has changed too much, However on the flip side If Halo didn’t change much people would complain that its basically the same game.
People complain that all these new changes to halo 4 is turning into CoD, However if every Halo game came out with little to no changes then in my opinion it will become like CoD where every game is the same.
I don’t want to play another Halo 3 because I’ve already played it, if I wanted to play halo 3 then I’d play Halo 3, when I buy a new game I want to play a New game with new Additions, I don’t want an expensive Map pack.
Halo 3 got matchmaking right.
Although, at its core, Halo 4 is nothing like Halo 3. It still feels like a new game even with the removal of things like perks, loadouts, Ordinance, and Armor Abilities.
People weren’t complaining about CoD because it was the same game every year, they were complaining about CoD because it was the same poorly designed broken lump of overly polished turd every year.
Here’s the problem: The “hardcore fanbase” really liked Halo 3’s MM. That’s fine. Since then, the changes have been such that those players don’t like it. That’s also fine.
Bungie should have and 343i should create a small collection of the more popular Halo 3 gametypes that play as closely to Halo 3 as possible.
Not only would that scratch the itch of people who want something different, but the people who like the old ways would also be better satisfied- though not completely. That would be impossible.
I have no problem with people who dislike Reach and Halo 4’s MM. I have a problem with people who demand that 343/Bungie put out the game they claim “everyone” wants, rather than the game the developers want. Those $60 you paid were for the game they made, not the game you demand. It’s pretty simple.
> Here’s the problem: The “hardcore fanbase” really liked Halo 3’s MM. That’s fine. Since then, the changes have been such that those players don’t like it. That’s also fine.
>
> Bungie should have and 343i should create a small collection of the more popular Halo 3 gametypes that play as closely to Halo 3 as possible.
>
> Not only would that scratch the itch of people who want something different, but the people who like the old ways would also be better satisfied- though not completely. That would be impossible.
>
> I have no problem with people who dislike Reach and Halo 4’s MM. I have a problem with people who demand that 343/Bungie put out the game they claim “everyone” wants, rather than the game the developers want. Those $60 you paid were for the game they made, not the game you demand. It’s pretty simple.
i agree with this post . h4 is a good game but it could be even better all they have to do is add a classic halo ranked playlist with team doubles team slayer team snipers once they have takin out some of that auto aim mlg and have a ranked swat and lw and also a 1-50 visible ranking system . then on there other side of things have a social playlist with all the current game types and what ever else the have commimg up then i really think most people would be happy . well apart from a few small other changes eg nerffs and buffs
> People say CoD is terrible because it’s the same every year, personally I don’t want the same Halo every couple of years.
it will not be the same it is h4 and if they have a social and ranked play list you dont have to play ranked nothing would change for u as u could just play socialnow so whats the problem with it . it covers both views on the point .
> > People say CoD is terrible because it’s the same every year, personally I don’t want the same Halo every couple of years.
>
> it will not be the same it is h4 and if they have a social and ranked play list you dont have to play ranked nothing would change for u as u could just play socialnow so whats the problem with it . it covers both views on the point .
Why do you care so much about a ranking system? I play can competitively without it.
Screw Halo 3.5 I’d rather have H2 servers back on. Give me all the maps, and playlist(ranked, social and for godsake, clanmatchs!) and 343 can take halo in whatever direction they want.
because it gives you some thing to play for as well as kd and it really makes people call out more and work as a team as u have some thing to lose eg your rank and u are also fair more likely to come across people more your kind of skill rang in that game type it it is more competitive there was nothing like it in h3 when your were 49 49 in kills playing for your 50 sooo intense your heart would race every one calling out playing for map control and weapon and power up spawns ect … and the other thing is it was not easy to get a 50 in h3 thats what had people coming back for years … read the huge post on here
> Screw Halo 3.5 I’d rather have H2 servers back on. Give me all the maps, and playlist(ranked, social and for godsake, clanmatchs!) and 343 can take halo in whatever direction they want.
> > The problem with 343i is that they’re making all the wrong changes.
>
> It’s not that it’s different. That I don’t mind. It’s that it’s radically different.
>
> **By the way, “A lot can happen in 4 years” is a cop-out answer for re-involving the Covenant.[/**quote]
>
>
> Do we really know that all the covenant agreed with uniting with the humans? Unless there was a book I didn’t read that states all this? All peace treaties and unifications have people who don’t agree and break off to become rebels and such. Why would the covenant be any different?