Ok would you not buy Halo 4 if there was a playlist in it that you would not play on?
No, because there would be probably a dozen other playlists to choose from.
If that would be the case, I would have thrown Reach out of the window long time ago.
There will always be stupid playlists in the game, such a hostball and infection. But that’s not a reason to not get the game.
> No, because there would be probably a dozen other playlists to choose from.
Exactly!
Now here’s another question. Would you not buy Halo 4 if there was a couple playlists that involved Sprint and AAs?
Id buy it
Im a buy it
That would be a stupid reason.
Have fun highlighting my post to read.
Colored posts: FTL
> That would be a stupid reason.
>
> Have fun highlighting my post to read.
>
> Colored posts: FTL
Your post wasn’t hard to read at all.
Depends on how multiplayer looks before release and if i am satisfied enough with it then yes it’s highly likely i will buy it on release day, if im not happy with what i see on the multiplayer front then i will either lend a friends copy, rent it or buy it pre-owned simply to experience the campaign.
I refuse to feel like a chump again when i bought Reach on release knowing full well i was very disappointed in the Beta, Halo 4 is not having a Beta so im going to be cautious.
While i do enjoy the campaigns it’s the multiplayer that will give the game long term value so i refuse to pay full price simply to experience the campaign when i could either lend from a friend/rent or buy it cheap pre-owned 
No, but does it have a good chance of dividing the community and possibly shunning a good chunk of the skilled / competitive / whatever you want to call it without -Yoinking!- at me.
I’ll still buy the game, dosn’t mean im happy that they are going to knowingly put something in the devalues core game mechanics.
And go respond to my post on the sprint thread you -Yoink- -Yoink- -Yoink-. You wanted to argue, so lets.
> No, but does it have a good chance of dividing the community and possibly shunning a good chunk of the skilled / competitive / whatever you want to call it without -Yoinking!- at me.
>
> I’ll still buy the game, dosn’t mean im happy that they are going to knowingly put something in the devalues core game mechanics.
>
> And go respond to my post on the sprint thread you Yoink! -Yoink!- -Yoink!-. You wanted to argue, so lets.
Wait so you won’t be happy with something that you won’t be using?
it will effect the community and my personal game experience more than likely.
if i get one playlist, (please god let it be ranked or hell will break loose) and the rest of the community plays team slayer (like always) than my experience is ruined, my playlist is dead within weaks, and even possibly removed because game devs tender to the majority. who just happen to be bad.
i dont think theres anything that would make me not buy halo 4
it also may negate the chance of me playing doubles (my favorite playlist) and so on. Map design is also a big factor. When all the big and open hallway maps are designed for sprint it takes away from the balanced great maps we could have.
i could keep going, but you’ve seen and ignored all of this before so this time wont be any different.
> > No, because there would be probably a dozen other playlists to choose from.
>
> Exactly!
> Now here’s another question. Would you not buy Halo 4 if there was a couple playlists that involved Sprint and AAs?
No to both of your questions, there are a few play lists in both Halo 3 and Halo Reach that I don’t like or hate, but that has never stopped me from playing.
Sprint doesn’t bother me all the much, some AAs bug me, but I’m man enough to deal with them.
No. Mainly because there will always be more playlists to choose from.
I’m not a big fan of Snipers. Doesn’t give me a reason to ask for its removal or to not play in general.
> Ok would you not buy Halo 4 if there was a playlist in it that you would not play on?
As bad as Halo 4 may be, everyone will buy it.
It’s Halo, a must own game.
Also why would the playlist dictate the game’s potential?