> 2533274878400915;2:
> Well, one major consideration is that any psychologist, and especially adolescent psychologists will tell you that no adolescent is capable of giving consent, especially not a war orphan. Cognition develops over time, through experience and through the development of their neural pathways; there’s literally a medical reason why you can’t make a legally binding agreement with a child.
>
> The only arguments that remain in favor of Ackerson and Halsey are:
> A) The -Yoink!- conundrum—were they just following the demands of their superiors?
> B) Is it justifiable to exploit children only if you are successful?
> C) Speculation that without the tactics or “weapon” utilized, the battle/war would’ve had greater consequences. (See: arguments for & against the use of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.)
> D) Ackerson and Halsey are scapegoats. Both programs had the approval of the admiralty. Others like Parangosky, Hood, Keyes, etc. should all also be on trial.
>
> These children sacrificed their lives for humanity. And I think so too should Ackerson and Halsey accept that they too made a sacrifice by paying the price for justifying the means with the end. In their own way, they are heroes. In their own way, they are villains. In different respects and to different degrees, they are both; there’s no reason they have to be one or the other, but I personally, would see that they paid for their crimes in some way.
Well Halsey did ultimately pay the price for her crimes spending around 3-4 years locked up. We have no idea where it was exactly, but we do know it was ONI’s custody and not the UNSC’s. I do not believe she deserves as harsh a punishment as Ackerson should’ve received considering that he was far more ruthless with his usage of his S-IIIs, seeing them as disposable in a way, which is more than certainly grim, and really undeserving for the most part. But at least some survived the war, right guys? Glad to see Ackerson have a brutal death, which in a way, brings justice.
> 2533274811368357;3:
> He had Parangosky’s full support and was Halsey’s no.2 hater (second only to Parangosky herself), given that she was still CINCONI after the war there was no way that man was going to face a single consequence for his actions. Parangosky even says in Glasslands that she was going to get him to lead the Spartan-IV project and have Halsey working under him.
Just because he had Parangosky’s support didn’t mean he wouldn’t be used as a scapegoat later, as ONI had done with Halsey.
Speaking of Halsey, do you have a source saying that Parangosky had distain for her. Serin Osman (Parangosky’s successor) I am aware dislikes Halsey as she makes it abundantly clear in many sources such as in a Halo 4 Spartan Ops cutscene, but that’s getting us sidetracked.
As for Ackerson leading the Spartan-IV project with Halsey working under him, that is one helluva recipe for disaster to say the least.