Willing to pay another $60 for Infinite's multiplayer

I know it sounds dumb but at this point I don’t care, make an actual player-friendly progression system that rewards skill and time played like Halo: Reach, slap a &60 price tag on it and call it Halo Infinite Multiplayer Premium Version or whatever.

It’s painfully obvious nothing else will convince whoever is making the MTX decisions for this game, so screw it, take more of my money ,at least I’d be spending it on something I actually want.

2 Likes

If it ment absolutely no mtx and a fully paid game with all the customization then yeah I would

2 Likes

As bad as it is honestly i wanna say yes I’d do the same. But the fact they’re charging full price for a half baked campaign I can’t support this…

Edit: this games already 100 bucks for Australians…

2 Likes

if it meant this monetization scheme wasn’t painfully in my face, and i’d EARN MY COSMETICS like Reach. then yes, i’d happily pay 343 another 60, going to 120 for campaign and multiplayer

1 Like

I’d consider it. Only because I believe they said the campaign expansions are supposed to be free. We are dealing with 343i tho…

1 Like

Buy 6 battle passes, play game. Get more customisation than Reach.

Nice.

Every time Halo Infinite releases 3 maps, buy another battle pass. You now have much more than Halo Reach.

1 Like

I think the current model will be cheaper when I only drop $10 or $20 on the one armor set or premium battle pass that tickles me pink. I don’t need the whole collection; just one kit.

1 Like

I always would have payed for multiplayer that included full functionality and no microtransactions. Let me play the playlists ffs.

1 Like

How many playlists and game modes did Reach have compared to this? I’m not paying for anything except actual gameplay content.

1 Like

Reach launched with 8 playlists:

FFA
Slayer
Objective
Multi-team
Big Team
Invasion
Ranked
Ranked Doubles

I’m not saying the playlists we have on Infinite are acceptable, but it’s not like Reach launched with fan favourite modes like SWAT or Snipers either.

1 Like

Reach also launched with forge and co-op on day one

What’s Infinite’s excuse

That list of playlists is awesome. And you can’t forget Firefight. Invasion was an awesome mode like Unreal Tournament’s Assault mode. Will we see a comeback for Infinite? Mayhaps in a long while, but we don’t even have split Slayer Objective yet. :frowning:

2 Likes

It’s a different requirement for forge and co-op lol.

If you’re happy with Reach’s forge then by all means have that one instead. We are getting something really special with this forge.

1 Like

Ah yes I was just focusing on PvP. There was also Firefight and Score Attack for PvE. So two PvE modes compared to Infinite’s one, Not Bootcamp.

I actually like the merged slayer and objective. I know it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. We need more playlists but every Halo has launched bare bones lol.

People have very selective memories.

1 Like

Huh? You call that list you gave bare bones?.. I guess if that’s your perspective. Lol.

Wow problem is still that with 6 years of developement 343 is not able to deliver forge on release. Imagine that game would have been released last year :wink:

I know that is pretty crazy to think that was gonna happen. Awful behaviour.

It’s a very ambitious forge. I cannot wait. They may have a version that was ready to go last year but now we are getting a more advanced version all in one go that would have came with updates. Who knows really, not us.

1 Like

Why should 343i care when you stopped caring?
Why shouldn’t care 343i about those players which are still playing?

Sweet post, but I don’t think you thought your proposition entirely through.

1 Like

Well people just should stop buying stuff in the Store. Then 343/-Yoink!- will care ^^

I am sure the economists at Microsoft will be watching threads like these very closely.

“There’s no way we can get them to pay $120 for this game!”
“Oh, yeah? Watch this…”

It really does lend credence to the theories that go around when companies show us awful monetisation systems. People say they make everything terrible, just to “revert” to the system they actually wanted to implement in the first place, and people praise them for it, because “at least it’s not as bad as the launch system”.