Title. Hopefully we can get some sort of confirmation for this
Playing through campaign does unlock things in mp, like cosmetics etc, not entirely sure if it get’s counted towards battle pass or not though
I don’t think it does, nor do I think it should tbh
Pretty sure this was confirmed through challenges
This is a hard one. I don’t think it will but I don’t know if that’s right. There is a subset (I think a small one) that purely plays campaign. I don’t think they should be excluded from earning rewards. But I don’t love the idea of “Complete 2 Banished Outposts” to earn 100XP. I think this is where an XP for game time played would have benefited them.
would do people always assume solo players are a small number? just like people assume splitscreen users are a small minority.
we exist and in greater numbers than you think.
> 2533274836669416;5:
> This is a hard one. I don’t think it will but I don’t know if that’s right. There is a subset (I think a small one) that purely plays campaign. I don’t think they should be excluded from earning rewards. But I don’t love the idea of “Complete 2 Banished Outposts” to earn 100XP. I think this is where an XP for game time played would have benefited them.
“I think a small one”? HAHAHAHA
My friend, you cannot imagine how far the number of players that we focus exclusively on the campaign goes.
Responding to the OP, hopefully there will be unique challenges to the campaign moving forward in the battle pass. At the end of the day, both parties will be treated as differentiated games, multiplayer on the one hand and campaign on the other, it would not seem unreasonable to see challenges that only appear in the campaign and serve to advance in the battle pass, without affecting the multiplayer challenges .
> 2533274842428280;7:
> > 2533274836669416;5:
> > This is a hard one. I don’t think it will but I don’t know if that’s right. There is a subset (I think a small one) that purely plays campaign. I don’t think they should be excluded from earning rewards. But I don’t love the idea of “Complete 2 Banished Outposts” to earn 100XP. I think this is where an XP for game time played would have benefited them.
>
> “I think a small one”? HAHAHAHA
>
> My friend, you cannot imagine how far the number of players that we focus exclusively on the campaign goes.
>
> Responding to the OP, hopefully there will be unique challenges to the campaign moving forward in the battle pass. At the end of the day, both parties will be treated as differentiated games, multiplayer on the one hand and campaign on the other, it would not seem unreasonable to see challenges that only appear in the campaign and serve to advance in the battle pass, without affecting the multiplayer challenges .
I am 99% sure they have shown an image of campaign BP challenges.
> 2533274792737987;8:
> I am 99% sure they have shown an image of campaign BP challenges.
Can I ask you please to find it?
Thanks in advance 
> 2533274809353160;9:
> > 2533274792737987;8:
> > I am 99% sure they have shown an image of campaign BP challenges.
>
> Can I ask you please to find it?
> Thanks in advance
I’m not going through all of the material just to find it. I don’t have that type of free time.
> 2533274836669416;5:
> This is a hard one. I don’t think it will but I don’t know if that’s right. There is a subset (I think a small one) that purely plays campaign. I don’t think they should be excluded from earning rewards. But I don’t love the idea of “Complete 2 Banished Outposts” to earn 100XP. I think this is where an XP for game time played would have benefited them.
Unlike most FPS communities, half of Halo players are more interested by Campaign than PvP.
> 2535419445147641;11:
> > 2533274836669416;5:
> > There is a subset (I think a small one) that purely plays campaign.
>
> Unlike most FPS communities, half of Halo players are more interested by Campaign than PvP.
You can’t talk dirty like that without showing me some curves.
> 2533274842428280;7:
> > 2533274836669416;5:
> > This is a hard one. I don’t think it will but I don’t know if that’s right. There is a subset (I think a small one) that purely plays campaign. I don’t think they should be excluded from earning rewards. But I don’t love the idea of “Complete 2 Banished Outposts” to earn 100XP. I think this is where an XP for game time played would have benefited them.
>
> “I think a small one”? HAHAHAHA
>
> My friend, you cannot imagine how far the number of players that we focus exclusively on the campaign goes.
>
> Responding to the OP, hopefully there will be unique challenges to the campaign moving forward in the battle pass. At the end of the day, both parties will be treated as differentiated games, multiplayer on the one hand and campaign on the other, it would not seem unreasonable to see challenges that only appear in the campaign and serve to advance in the battle pass, without affecting the multiplayer challenges .
Indeed. I’m a player who spends at a lot of time in the campaign, so I’d like to think I would be rewarded for my time there.
I figured the bigger complaint would be from the F2P Miltiplayer-only crowd, who would complain of having challenges taken up by activities locked behind another paywall.
Personally I think the best way to go about it, would be to tie XP payouts for certain campaign activities that get added to your battle pass.
For instance, liberating a squad of marines could award you 10XP, and taking out a base like in the trailer could be 100XP.
> 2533274810945725;13:
> For instance, liberating a squad of marines could award you 10XP, and taking out a base like in the trailer could be 100XP.
THIS would be lovely
But it would be fair to reduce the rewards in comparison to pvp (in multiplayer it is obviously more complicated to complete challenges)
Or add like a multiplier for the difficulty (normal / heroic / legendary)
> 2533274809353160;14:
> > 2533274810945725;13:
> > For instance, liberating a squad of marines could award you 10XP, and taking out a base like in the trailer could be 100XP.
>
> THIS would be lovely
>
> But it would be fair to reduce the rewards in comparison to pvp (in multiplayer it is obviously more complicated to complete challenges)
>
> Or add like a multiplier for the difficulty (normal / heroic / legendary)
Agreed.
We don’t know how often we’ll be running into these sorts activities in the campaign, or how easily it would be to navigate the save functions to load up again for potential farming.
It would have to be tuned based on the average XP per hour achieved in PvP.
But yeah, multipliers for difficulty level would be great too, maybe even skulls.
They way i had it understood, the battle pass is mm specific. But there are campaign specific unlocks
> 2533274916092141;1:
> Title. Hopefully we can get some sort of confirmation for this
As a campaign only player, I sure damn hope that’s how it work! It would be ridiculous if campaign players were forced to play MP to get any new armors.
Unfortunately, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Battle Pass can only progress through multiplayer. The name of the game these days is “player retention”, behind-the-scenes metrics, and in-game store sales.
> 2533274916092141;1:
> Title. Hopefully we can get some sort of confirmation for this
bruh
silly request
you do know that the campaign and the MP are treated as basically different games?
There won’t be any confirmation because this is silly.
> 2533274916092141;1:
> Title. Hopefully we can get some sort of confirmation for this
Campaign will have no affect on your battle pass. Yet another reason why not having an EXP progression system at launch is a colossal failure. However, you will be able to unlock cosmetics for MP by achieving things in campaign. I still don’t know how you can look back at Halo Reach and see how the credit/challenge system not only encouraged players to play the entire game to its fullest but also reward them for it and then just abandon that system for a decade.