> 2533274973373704;9:
> Thanks again for taking time to reply to me and providing some very helpful info.
>
> So, I’ve been doing some research for the past 2 days (considering my sound products-related knowledge is very limited), and I’ve come to some shocking conclusions on how audio accessories manufacturers advertise their “gaming” headsets.
>
> Anyway, based on your replies and what I’ve learned so far, I’ve come to a conclusion that: high quality stereo headsets + external 7.1 soundcard, perform better and produce higher sound quality than “super pro hardcore gamer’s 7.1” headsets, right?
>
> Also, Can any external 5.1/7.1 soundcard make stereo headsets surround? If so, does it come down to your soundcard’s capabilities?
For the best positional audio, it’s high quality headphones with open design + decent amp and DAC.
All sound cards advertised as 7.1 or 5.1 either A) mean that you can connect a surround sound system of multiple speakers to it or B) use virtual surround for headphones, i.e. they create the effect in software. As a headphone user, you really don’t benefit from anything advertised as 7.1 or 5.1 because you only have two channels, and all the positional effects should already be there in the source audio.
All the super pro hardcore 7.1 gaming headsets do the exact same tricks as these 7.1 sound cards. They use software tricks to get the surround effect. When it comes to headphones, good stereo sound really is better than virtual surround sound.
I actually have a short story related to this. You see, as I said, surround sound on headphones is only software tricks, you don’t need any special hardware for it. One free piece of software for creating virtual surround is Razer Surround.
I tried this software the first time it came out to see how it is. The surround effect was adequate, and I absentmindedly left it on. Later, I was listening to music and it sounded all garbled and muddy. I didn’t understand immediately what was going on, until I went and tried disabling Razer Surround. The sound quality went immediately to what it should be. I ditched Razer Surround immediately.
I had had a similar experience earlier when I wasn’t educated on audio, and bought my Turtle Beach X41s for the Xbox 360. The headset had two modes, stereo and surround. Back then I couldn’t quite put my finger on it, but whenever I shuffled between the modes, the stereo mode always sounded a bit better for some reason. But I didn’t know better back then, so I always used the surround mode. Now I know that the stereo mode was, indeed, better. It produced no loss in positional audio and had better sound quality than the surround mode.
That’s my experience with surround sound on headphones, and that plus all the things I’ve learned is the reason why I advise staying away from anything that says “surround” when it comes to headphones. Proper stereo sound is all you need.
> 2533274973373704;9:
> Last question. Some people mentioned that wireless headsets have some latency? some kind of voice lag?
Anything wireless has latency. Frankly, everything has latency, but wireless device by their nature tend to have more latency than their wired counter parts. To be honest, I’m not sure if that’s something to worry about. I don’t believe the amount of latency will impact the experience, but I don’t know what kind of effects it can have on performance. Competitive gamers tend to prefer low latency on everything, but for casual gamers, if dealing with wires is always a hassle, wireless is a good solution.