Instead of fan boys moaning at me and calling me a hater, and instead of nostalgia loyalists fighting them in the comments i want people to read this thread and understand WHY some people don’t like halo 5.
Story
-This one is almost universally known but it should still be mentioned.
-Halo 5’s story was terrible. There are no ifs ands or buts about it. It not only destroyed plot point set up in halo 4 (the librarian, the Janus key, Palmer and Halsey, the didact and his story, making cortanas death meaningless).
-Locke and Osiris (besides Buck) were completely boring with little to no character development between them.
-Blue team was completely wasted potential.
-Cortana is now evil and is also not dead, wut?
-Arbiter was wasted potential, he wasn’t even remotely relevant to the story, you could swap the planet sanghelious with any other planet and the arbiter would still have no impact on the story, he just is here to appease fans. Not to mention he didn’t even say one word to chief or barley look at him, just a little “were it so easy” would have been enough, but no.
-A cliff hanger that did earn it. “but halo 2 had a cliff hanger”. The difference is halo 2 earned it, the story in halo 2 was well written, doesn’t crap on the stroy set up in halo 1, and unlike halo 5 gives characters a reason for their existence in the story as well as making characters we like and care about. Halo 5 never earned it’s cliff hanger were as halo 2 did.
-You can’t pick up skulls, why?
The gameplay
Before i get started on this, this is not about weather or not spartan abilities are good for halo, but why people have left halo because of them.
Like it or not the game play is not halo, it may be fun but it is not halo, well not the halo fans expect in the master chief saga. “But halo needs to evolve” okay, but do it in a spin off game, people have no problem with gameplay changing this fundamentally when it is in a spin off game because we don’t expect the consistency we expect in the chief saga. Could you imagine if Halo wars was the sequel to halo 3, or if spartan assault was the sequel to halo 4? People would be outraged and rightly so.
Although that is an extreme example it is the same principle.
Many fans are upset and have left halo because they expect the chief saga to have a consistent level of gameplay which is no spartan abilities, just weapons, grenades, melee. You may not like it but that is what defined the chief saga fundamentally. It is also why fans were annoyed when small additions like dual wielding, and equipment were introduced into halo 2 and 3, they didn’t change the formula to the extent sprint and spartan abilities do but it was enough to annoy the fans. If you want sprint in halo fine, but don’t do it in the chief saga, do it in a spin off like ODST 2. Adding spartan abilities means every single thing in halo needs to be changed to accommodate it, map design, bullet magnetism, aim assist, weapon and vehicle damage, vehicle physics and centre of balance. You may not like that but that is why people are leaving in terms of gameplay.
Customisation
Everyone can agree the customisation in halo 5 is appalling, we get 3 options for armour, 3! “But we have more armour to choose from” yes but it should be quality over quantity, most armour is just a reskined variant of the same thing. Halo reach should be the minimum of armour customisation in halo. Legs, arms, helmets, chest, visor, wrist. Also what the hell happened to tertiary colours? We only get 2 now, why? Also why the hell do our emblems not show up on our armour, at least give us the option to toggle it on or off. Also what happened to our emblem customisation? We can’t even changed the background of our emblems now. Also why do our Spartans periodically freeze when rotating in the customisation screen?
Worst of all, there is a mega thread with tens of thousands of comments and there are even more posts around the internet demanding playable elites. With this much attention from the fan on playable elites how can 343 ignore this? “But it will mess up balance” Sigh, have you ever played halo reach? Elites should not be in competitive multiplayer, they should only be in social playlists, custom games, and forge (maybe even campaign depending on the story). You would think with such massive demand 343 would want to provide the content.
Split Screen
Does this even need defending?
UI
If you have ever defended the UI in halo 5 you should be ashamed of yourself. In reach in seconds you could see, what team a person was on, what their rank was, what their name was, what their emblem was, what they looked like, what their armour completion was, how many challenges they completed, what their clan was, what their commendations were.
In halo 5 you cans see a persons emblem. Step it up 343. -Yoink!-.
The change in art style
Like it or not, the change in art style was completely unnecessary and over all damaging to the halo franchise. It split the fan base and for what reason “to redesign halo”. No, if you want to redesign halo do it in a spin off game, again, players expect consistency in a squeal. “the technology is more advanced” technology can look more advanced without completely changing the art style. Look at halo wars 1, it is 20 years before halo 1 and yet it respects the art style despite being less advanced. Hell, go on any halo wars 2 video and all you will see is praise for the old art style. If 343 returns to the old art style the wounds they will heal will be very beneficial.
My god, could you imagine in halo 6 a pelican looking like one from halo 3 opening its door, only to show chief in the armour he wore in halo 2 anniversary, fans would go insane from joy!
You might be confused why his armour changed back, but hay, now you know how long time fans felt when his armour, along with the ENTIRE forward unto dawn completely changed in halo 4 from halo 3.
DELAYED CONTENT
I’m sure everyone has heard the common “it’s coming later for free in an update” response. This is so ridicules i can’t comprehend it.
Delaying content we expect at launch to come later does not bring back players who left because of the lack of content at launch. A good way to explain this is by using the MCC. The MCC launch was so terrible the population died very quickly, they fixed it later but the population was already dead. Although halo 5 is a content issue and not a broken game issue the same logic applies. First impressions count, if players don’t have the content like forge, btb, firefight, infection, griffball, race, regicide, king of the hill, and many many more at launch they won’t come back, period.
If you must have content updates it should be for things we don’t expect in halo games. Things like a needle warthog, or a new type of weapon.Not for critical game modes.