Restate the title in case it got cut,
How come whenever people sugest a new Halo 4 system/multiplayer…
…it always comes out to be a Halo 2 or Halo 3 remake?
i understand that both H2 and 3 were good (bisides the lag) but why do you want the same gameplay?
what’s new about it? NOTHING!
so what it the next halo in the line? its the start of a new trillogy, so there should be a new system
post your thoughts
Agree.
> Restate the title in case it got cut,
>
> How come whenever people sugest a new Halo 4 system/multiplayer…
>
> …it always comes out to be a Halo 2 or Halo 3 remake?
>
> i understand that both H2 and 3 were good (bisides the lag) but why do you want the same gameplay?
>
> what’s new about it? NOTHING!
>
> so what it the next halo in the line? its the start of a new trillogy, so there should be a new system
>
>
>
> post your thoughts
Maybe it’s because they’d rather have old and good (although I don’t think H3 qualifies) than new and crappy.
Some people just think change is bad.
> > Restate the title in case it got cut,
> >
> > How come whenever people sugest a new Halo 4 system/multiplayer…
> >
> > …it always comes out to be a Halo 2 or Halo 3 remake?
> >
> > i understand that both H2 and 3 were good (bisides the lag) but why do you want the same gameplay?
> >
> > what’s new about it? NOTHING!
> >
> > so what it the next halo in the line? its the start of a new trillogy, so there should be a new system
> >
> >
> >
> > post your thoughts
>
> Maybe it’s because they’d rather have old and good (although I don’t think H3 qualifies) than new and crappy.
who says that it will be crappy?
who says new is crappy?
343 has already confirmed that they will NEVER even think about implementing bloom into another HALO game EVER again
keep your hopes high, 343 will listen
I completely agree. When people say, “Halo 4 needs to be like Halo 2/3” I say, “Halo 4 should be like Halo 4”. I think people don’t really know what they want; they just liked Halo 2/3 so they ask for the same thing. If Halo 4 gameplay is just like 2 or 3 it will be uninteresting. I could pull the CoD card but I won’t.
And that’s all I’ve got to say about that.
it’s human nature, people have seen that systems from halo 2 and 3 work so that is what they use because they know it works.
> I completely agree. When people say, “Halo 4 needs to be like Halo 2/3” I say, “Halo 4 should be like Halo 4”. I think people don’t really know what they want; they just liked Halo 2/3 so they ask for the same thing. If Halo 4 gameplay is just like 2 or 3 it will be uninteresting. I could pull the CoD card but I won’t.
>
> And that’s all I’ve got to say about that.
“Halo 4 should be like Halo 4”
perfect quote is perfect
this basicly sums up everything i say
I don’t think it’s that people are scared of change, because the right type of change can be very very good, But you’re forgetting Reach. I enjoy Reach somewhat, just started playing it again, but if I could, I’d still be on Halo 2.
Many people come across as aggressive when it comes to change, because of what they saw in Reach.
It’s about the right type of change, if 343 can keep Halo at it’s core, and add nice changes, and still keep the overall feel of Halo alive, then well, we’ll get an even better product than Halo 2.
I approve of the right type of change, whether you agree with me or not is a different story, But I want to be able to pick up my pad and still be able to see that it’s a Halo game at heart (to me that means being as competitive as Halo2/3, decent ranking system, amazing story with amazing yet bizarre looking environments) Add the nice changes and the new ideas(that work nicely)
> > > Restate the title in case it got cut,
> > >
> > > How come whenever people sugest a new Halo 4 system/multiplayer…
> > >
> > > …it always comes out to be a Halo 2 or Halo 3 remake?
> > >
> > > i understand that both H2 and 3 were good (bisides the lag) but why do you want the same gameplay?
> > >
> > > what’s new about it? NOTHING!
> > >
> > > so what it the next halo in the line? its the start of a new trillogy, so there should be a new system
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > post your thoughts
> >
> > Maybe it’s because they’d rather have old and good (although I don’t think H3 qualifies) than new and crappy.
>
> who says that it will be crappy?
> who says new is crappy?
>
>
> 343 has already confirmed that they will NEVER even think about implementing bloom into another HALO game EVER again
>
> keep your hopes high, 343 will listen
The day they say the will NEVER even think about implementing AA’s into another HALO game EVER again, is the day I might begin to be slightly less pessimistic.
343 can try something new with H5. For H4 I just want to see if they actually understand what made CE and H2 great, so the franchise can be rebuilt and bring back all those fans that left.
> > > > Restate the title in case it got cut,
> > > >
> > > > How come whenever people sugest a new Halo 4 system/multiplayer…
> > > >
> > > > …it always comes out to be a Halo 2 or Halo 3 remake?
> > > >
> > > > i understand that both H2 and 3 were good (bisides the lag) but why do you want the same gameplay?
> > > >
> > > > what’s new about it? NOTHING!
> > > >
> > > > so what it the next halo in the line? its the start of a new trillogy, so there should be a new system
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > post your thoughts
> > >
> > > Maybe it’s because they’d rather have old and good (although I don’t think H3 qualifies) than new and crappy.
> >
> > who says that it will be crappy?
> > who says new is crappy?
> >
> >
> > 343 has already confirmed that they will NEVER even think about implementing bloom into another HALO game EVER again
> >
> > keep your hopes high, 343 will listen
>
> The day they say the will NEVER even think about implementing AA’s into another HALO game EVER again, is the day I might begin to be slightly less pessimistic.
>
> 343 can try something new with H5. For H4 I just want to see if they actually understand what made CE and H2 great, so the franchise can be rebuilt and bring back all those fans that left.
The role of Halo:ACE was to bring back those thru old halo moments so that they can start fresh with halo 4.
well it will have to be similar to at least 1 halo game, so it may as well be like H2, because(apparently) it was good. or be like H3, because it was fun. or a mix of both.
> The day they say the will NEVER even think about implementing AA’s into another HALO game EVER again, is the day I might begin to be slightly less pessimistic.
>
> 343 can try something new with H5. For H4 I just want to see if they actually understand what made CE and H2 great, so the franchise can be rebuilt and bring back all those fans that left.
but AA’s work when done right, they just weren’t done right in reach but this doesn’t mean they should not be in future halo games.
i don’t blame you though, the majority of the human population has the mentality of “i’ve seen it to not work therefore it will never work”, actually, i shouldn’t say mentality, more human nature.