Halo 2 + Halo 2= Halo 4 
Uhhh…
Dear god you may be onto something…
/sarcasm
> Dear god you may be onto something…
>
> /sarcasm
Im rolling on the floor laughing.
Amazing! 
Thats me convinced.
Then by your logic:
Halo Reach + Halo Reach = Worst Halo ever?
I ACTUALLY LIKED REACH.
> Then by your logic:
>
> Halo Reach + Halo Reach = Worst Halo ever?
>
> I ACTUALLY LIKED REACH.
Nope.
Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD
> > Then by your logic:
> >
> > Halo Reach + Halo Reach = Worst Halo ever?
> >
> > I ACTUALLY LIKED REACH.
>
> Nope.
>
> Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
>
> Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD
Wait, wouldn’t it be 0?
Or would it be -Halo:Reach?
What would CE + CE be?
WTF???
> > Then by your logic:
> >
> > Halo Reach + Halo Reach = Worst Halo ever?
> >
> > I ACTUALLY LIKED REACH.
>
> Nope.
>
> Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
>
> Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD
Twice as good…
So this guy is claiming that Halo 4 will be twice as good as Halo 2. That’s quite the bold statement.
Halo math hurts my brain.
> > Then by your logic:
> >
> > Halo Reach + Halo Reach = Worst Halo ever?
> >
> > I ACTUALLY LIKED REACH.
>
> Nope.
>
> Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
>
> Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD
lolololl
this is the off-topic thread we want not cupholders and such
> > > Then by your logic:
> > >
> > > Halo Reach + Halo Reach = Worst Halo ever?
> > >
> > > I ACTUALLY LIKED REACH.
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
> >
> > Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD
>
> Wait, wouldn’t it be 0?
>
> Or would it be -Halo:Reach?
>
> What would CE + CE be?
>
> WTF???
Halo math will always be an enigma.
CE + CE = CE^2
> > > > Then by your logic:
> > > >
> > > > Halo Reach + Halo Reach = Worst Halo ever?
> > > >
> > > > I ACTUALLY LIKED REACH.
> > >
> > > Nope.
> > >
> > > Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
> > >
> > > Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD
> >
> > Wait, wouldn’t it be 0?
> >
> > Or would it be -Halo:Reach?
> >
> > What would CE + CE be?
> >
> > WTF???
>
> Halo math will always be an enigma.
>
> CE + CE = CE^2
But what is anniversary?
? + ?=CEA
> > Nope.
> >
> > Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
> >
> > <mark>Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD</mark>
>
> <mark>Wait, wouldn’t it be 0?</mark>
>
> Or would it be -Halo:Reach?
>
> What would CE + CE be?
>
> WTF???
He may be saying that CoD = 0, by the Transitive Property. Or substitution. They’re the same thing, to be honest…
Wait…
Halo 2xHalo 2=Halo 4…
Which also happens to be Halo 2 squared…
With all this evidence, it must be true!
> > > Nope.
> > >
> > > Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
> > >
> > > <mark>Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD</mark>
> >
> > <mark>Wait, wouldn’t it be 0?</mark>
> >
> > Or would it be -Halo:Reach?
> >
> > What would CE + CE be?
> >
> > WTF???
>
> He may be saying that CoD = 0, by the Transitive Property. Or substitution. They’re the same thing, to be honest…
But 0 is non-existent…so that means CoD doesn’t exist…
Screw this, I’m off to bed.
head explodes
> > > Then by your logic:
> > >
> > > Halo Reach + Halo Reach = Worst Halo ever?
> > >
> > > I ACTUALLY LIKED REACH.
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> > Halo: Reach + Halo: Reach = A game twice as good as Halo: Reach
> >
> > Halo: Reach - Halo: Reach = CoD
>
> Wait, wouldn’t it be 0?
>
> Or would it be -Halo:Reach?
>
> What would CE + CE be?
>
> WTF???
But CoD is zero… (jk)