Halo 3 marked the epic conclusion to the Human-covenant war that we had been fighting since halo ce. It was the Introduction of forge and the only game to feature the Brute Elites (and their toys). It brought us the highs of killing truth and the loss of sgt. Johnson. Halo 3 ODST is as of now the only single player expansion in the franchise and lastly it was the last time we could dual wield in a halo game. I believe 3 and ODST should both get a face lift, real rain effects in new mombassa anyone? Blur cutscenes of the campaigns would be truly astounding and seening as the story of 2 and 3 are really one in the same its only right. A return to firefight? yes please! and imagine the prospect of replaying halo 3s story with spartan abilities and dual wielding in an infinity simulation using a tweaked version of Guardians sandbox. reach and 4 both look far better than 3 Graphically, lighting especially. also reach and 4 were a detour to what made 1-3s multiplayer great and reach is a serious pain for the canon people so I don’t feel these need to get a revamp they are also arguably less popular games. Maybe they can just add reach to mcc with a stable 60fps for its anniversary. How does the community feel about my rant?
I don’t think they’re going to be doing a Halo 3 Anniversary.
> 2533274845736258;2:
> I don’t think they’re going to be doing a Halo 3 Anniversary.
I dunno. 1 and 2 did and 3 seems, to me, a logical end to that trend. And I believe by redoing odst and something in the new engine for Xbox One with 3 anniversary would justify that. It couldn’t cost too much more than MCC, plus a halo 6 beta tied to the purchase of the Halo 3A. id see it turn profit, Why dont you see it happening? if you dont mind my asking
it looks pretty good for being on xbox 360. I think it would be a waste of resoures on their part to make it an anniversary
I believe thats a big point of view in the community. But I don’t see it as a purely graphics thing. H2A added a whole new forge. and I see H3A having so much more potential because it is not in MCC but has potential to be a true swand song and recognition of bungies original trilogy
> 2535411919953126;5:
> I believe thats a big point of view in the community. But I don’t see it as a purely graphics thing. H2A added a whole new forge. and I see H3A having so much more potential because it is not in MCC but has potential to be a true swand song and recognition of bungies original trilogy
Heres my take on the idea. Be advised H3 is my favorite so I am kinda biased. 1 The regular Anniversary treatment with blur cutscenes for both H3 and ODST(actual rain effects) perhaps sneak a bonus weapon/viechle from post H3 games. 2 a halo 3 map pack for halo5 and an 3anniversary game mode to go along with it, Elites included done by certain affinity of course. 3 Use the Xones dvr function so we can pause/rewind gameplay on the fly. 4 Here is my biggest dream request an infinity simulation of the Halo3 campaign where we use data extracted from the chiefs armour so we can play through the story with spartan abilities/new viechle system/smart scope and 2 man local co-op. This is easy to justify in lore and gives 343 a chance to beta flood/brute/bugger vs the new spartan abilities for Halo 6. A guy can dream, but i really do see this being worth a purchase even after buying mcc, hell delay H6 if you must. Last but not least Firefight both classic/anniversary(ODST) and infinity firefight(Spartan IV) . please give your opinion on this concept
I don’t think they are making a Halo 3 anniversary but are gonna celebrate it another way
I wanna see halo 4 with a 4K makeover.
They should stop at reach anniversary
I hope they will make Halo 3 Anniversary!
For me ODST Anniversary would be beautiful but, unfortunely, I don’t think they will do it…
Yes only original Halo trilogy needs Anniversary now, but in 2030 should be Halo Reach Anniversary and in 2040 collection whit all Halo games what have been released to that point in 2040 graphics.
If they do a Halo 3 anniversary i’ll get it but if they do not make Halo 3 anniversary i’m not going to lose any sleep over it.
Or they should completely stop trying to milk the franchise with remasters/anniversaries. Halo 3, ODST, Reach, is fine as it is. MCC was a way to introduce halo to 12 year olds. What would the purpose of the originals be then if they’re just gonna keep multiplying every few years? You’re essentially asking for a whole new game if you want it to run on the Halo 5 engine. To me it wouldn’t make sense and I prefer playing with original graphics because you see the progression of technology. 2007-2010 halo 3 had a great life span but doesn’t need to be redone. Thatll probably kill the franchise for me.
Actually, I’m fine with Halo 2 being the last anniversary game. They should focus on bringing us new experiences, rather than remaking old ones. Perhaps I’m biased because I personally hated Halo 3.
They should make all the anniversary titles they can. The point of them is to make money, and the more money they make, the more stable the company is, and the more assured is the future of Halo.
> 2535411919953126;3:
> > 2533274845736258;2:
> > I don’t think they’re going to be doing a Halo 3 Anniversary.
>
>
> I dunno. 1 and 2 did and 3 seems, to me, a logical end to that trend. And I believe by redoing odst and something in the new engine for Xbox One with 3 anniversary would justify that. It couldn’t cost too much more than MCC, plus a halo 6 beta tied to the purchase of the Halo 3A. id see it turn profit, Why dont you see it happening? if you dont mind my asking
Halo 3 is still a fairly recent and technologically advanced game. CE and 2 were on the original Xbox, they benefited greatly from a redux but I just don’t see Halo 3 either needing or benefiting from getting an Anniversary edition.
If you’d asked me before halo5 came out if I wanted a halo3 or reach remake I’d have said I didn’t care either way. But now when i try to go back and play any of the old games I can’t do it. I keep trying to boost dodge incoming 'nades and spartan charging brutes! So yeah, I’d go for a new version of these games with a halo 5 control setup.
> 2533274873843883;15:
> They should make all the anniversary titles they can. The point of them is to make money, and the more money they make, the more stable the company is, and the more assured is the future of Halo.
Possibly, possibly, however… MCC. MCC was something that didn’t do Halo many favors. I, for one, will not be buying any more Halo revamps. I’ve played the games. Halo 3 doesn’t need a graphical upgrade; it’s fine. I would rather that the NEW games have as much focus and dedication put toward them as possible, and make Halo a stable franchise from there.
> 2533274873843883;15:
> They should make all the anniversary titles they can. The point of them is to make money, and the more money they make, the more stable the company is, and the more assured is the future of Halo.
They are not effective at making money. Original titles sell considerably more than remakes. Making new content as opposed to rehashing old content is a much better idea.
> 2533274873843883;15:
> They should make all the anniversary titles they can. The point of them is to make money, and the more money they make, the more stable the company is, and the more assured is the future of Halo.
Unfortunately, attempting to sell larger quantities of a product doesn’t necessarily mean a larger revenue stream, especially in a market as volatile as video games.