> > And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
>
> Are you talking to me? If so you need to learn to quote… Also here is the soruce Here
>
> Beileve it or not, Reach still has 600,000 players a day to this very day on weekends.
600,000? you sure?
> > > And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
> >
> > Are you talking to me? If so you need to learn to quote… Also here is the soruce Here
> >
> > Beileve it or not, Reach still has 600,000 players a day to this very day on weekends.
>
> 600,000? you sure?
On weekends, yes. But on Weekdays it gets about 400,000 to 500,000. Source
What part of balanced didn´t you read?
I will complain too if they´re unbalanced, but you´re complaining just for knowing there are perks even if the´re a good idea.
Why a good idea?, i said it, it´s a way to let us play the way we play.
And don´t say “Halo has always”, because that´s not an argument, it´s just a prove you fear change.
If you really don´t want Halo to be like CoD, you´re doing it wrong, unless you actually want them to release the same game with minor tweaks every 3 years, like Activision does yearly.
And no, Reach is not unbalanced, not even Armor Lock is overpowered, the complains about Hologram are dumb (learn how to recognize one). The invisibility is annoying, but it´s supposed to work that way( to confuse the other team).
After 2 years it is still 6th most played… I really hate how people say Reach was a dissapointment because they have no idea what they are talking about.
> > > > And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
> > >
> > > Are you talking to me? If so you need to learn to quote… Also here is the soruce Here
> > >
> > > Beileve it or not, Reach still has 600,000 players a day to this very day on weekends.
> >
> > 600,000? you sure?
>
> On weekends, yes. But on Weekdays it gets about 400,000 to 500,000. Source
In the last 24 hours wich is the same as halo 3
I welcome change, just as most gamers do… even if you get the fanboys on the forums crying about new stuff
> > And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
>
> Are you talking to me? If so you need to learn to quote… Also here is the soruce Here
>
> Beileve it or not, Reach still has 600,000 players a day to this very day on weekends.
If it’s too difficult for you to guess who I was talking too I apologize.
Plyers per day =/= community. No one I know plays Reach as much as they played Halo 3, and I have never met someone on Reach who I would then play with again later.
> > > > > And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
> > > >
> > > > Are you talking to me? If so you need to learn to quote… Also here is the soruce Here
> > > >
> > > > Beileve it or not, Reach still has 600,000 players a day to this very day on weekends.
> > >
> > > 600,000? you sure?
> >
> > On weekends, yes. But on Weekdays it gets about 400,000 to 500,000. Source
>
> In the last 24 hours wich is the same as halo 3
No it doesen’t, count the zeros carefully.
> And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
Players per day =/=Quality.
Bassed on your logic, CoD is better than Halo, wich contradicts your fear for change.
i fear change because if bungie doesn’t like it and complete step 7, they maybe will ban us from playing H4 XD
> What´s so bad about perks?
>
> Just because CoD has (some) unbalanced Perks, doesn´t mean that Halo has to.
Please explain how you would do this?
People just don’t want Halo to change because
Just some reasons I think people are afraid of change.
Why do we fear change you ask!!!
Halo reach is my answer…
Halo 1,2,3 great games then comes the CHANGE to reach and it almost destroyed the franchise!
NOUGH SAID
> > What´s so bad about perks?
> >
> > Just because CoD has (some) unbalanced Perks, doesn´t mean that Halo has to.
>
> Please explain how you would do this
Making them pick ups and nothing that directly influes the gameplay (like a certain weapon or power ups)
Because my dear watson, I believe that none of us here want to be like god -Yoink!- CoD.
> Why do we fear change you ask!!!
> Halo reach is my answer…
> Halo 1,2,3 great games then comes the CHANGE to reach and it almost destroyed the franchise!
> NOUGH SAID
And can you please argument how Reach almost destroyed the Franchise?
> > And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
>
> Players per day =/=Quality.
>
>
> Bassed on your logic, CoD is better than Halo, wich contradicts your fear for change.
No I don’t, I know my wording wasn’t good there but player base doesn’t equal players per day. A player base is also your community, people who continue to play it AS other games come out.
I didn’t say the number of players in itself is important, it’s the number of players that continue playing and creating within the game after release. Long after release. The only way you are going to get that is through a unique and high quality game, making a game similar to others on the market means that players are more likely to transfer to the next similar game rather than sick around.
> Because my dear watson, I believe that none of us here want to be like god -Yoink!- CoD.
With or With no perks, the core gameplay itself makes the game different
> > > And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
> >
> > Players per day =/=Quality.
> >
> >
> > Bassed on your logic, CoD is better than Halo, wich contradicts your fear for change.
>
> No I don’t, I know my wording wasn’t good there but player base doesn’t equal players per day. A player base is also your community, people who continue to play it AS other games come out.
>
> I didn’t say the number of players in itself is important, it’s the number of players that continue playing and creating within the game after release. Long after release. The only way you are going to get that is through a unique and high quality game, making a game similar to others on the market means that players are more likely to transfer to the next similar game rather than sick around.
I would blame Reach leveling system, in which you feel no satisfaction and no progress, and with no progress sensation there is no way a fan base can still playing the same game.
> > > > And where is the mythical Reach community? It’s nothing compared to what Halo 3’s was, because most of them have gone off to play the next game (BF3, MW3) rather than stick around. Reach did not stand out enough in the genre to keep it’s playerbase.
> > >
> > > Players per day =/=Quality.
> > >
> > >
> > > Bassed on your logic, CoD is better than Halo, wich contradicts your fear for change.
> >
> > No I don’t, I know my wording wasn’t good there but player base doesn’t equal players per day. A player base is also your community, people who continue to play it AS other games come out.
> >
> > I didn’t say the number of players in itself is important, it’s the number of players that continue playing and creating within the game after release. Long after release. The only way you are going to get that is through a unique and high quality game, making a game similar to others on the market means that players are more likely to transfer to the next similar game rather than sick around.
>
> I would blame Reach leveling system, in which you feel no satisfaction and no progress, and with no progress sensation there is no way a fan base can still playing the same game.
Again, progression only lasts so long. I didn’t reach prestige before MW2 came out, did I care? no, I just bought the next game. Halo 3’s progression was not based of credits, and I would much prefer it to go mach to an achievement based system honestly, that also improved the community.