> Well at least you didnt get banned for playing with a friend who was your xbl guest who went three straight games with 0 kills - then got banned for 2 weeks COMPLETELY because it looked like I had an afk ghost guest…lol, still cant believe that happened to me 
Yeah, but I got banned for what seems to me being no apparent reason, and even IF I actually AFKed I got banned for 2 weeks after 1 game.
> > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > >
> > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > >
> > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > >
> > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> >
> > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
>
> Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
Plus, having a history of bans in the past makes you more of a target for future bans, just like a criminal record in real life.
It’s this way because people usually follow bad trends if they have a history of bad doings.
> > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > >
> > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > >
> > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > >
> > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > >
> > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> >
> > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
>
> I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
It is functioning as intended.
> > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > >
> > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > >
> > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > >
> > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> >
> > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
>
> The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
>
> It is functioning as intended.
Oh wow, really? Okay then, that’s kind of unfair in my opinion but I guess I can’t do anything about it, thanks again.
i know i am baned because i was “afk”/hiding on a firefight map (idk i could get band from that but now i wont do that again).
but i was wondering when my ban will be removed.
> > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > >
> > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > >
> > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > >
> > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> >
> > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
>
> The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
>
> It is functioning as intended.
Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
> > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > >
> > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > >
> > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> >
> > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> >
> > It is functioning as intended.
>
> Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
Once again, the ban hammer goes of zero kill games, it triggers it for AFKing activity, which you had, bans aren’t overturned because there is no way to differentiate a boosters or an AFKer.
If they attempted to go through every ban appeal, they would be there for years.
> > > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > > >
> > > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > > >
> > > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> > >
> > > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> > >
> > > It is functioning as intended.
> >
> > Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
>
> Once again, the ban hammer goes of zero kill games, it triggers it for AFKing activity, which you had, bans aren’t overturned because there is no way to differentiate a boosters or an AFKer.
>
> If they attempted to go through every ban appeal, they would be there for years.
Okay, but it isn’t fair for the people who just got zero kills and even have proof about it, so what I am saying is that 343 Industries does something about the AFKing ban system because it’s frustrating people who don’t deserve to get banned. I mean, why should it get triggered if someone got zero kills? What if they are just bad or had a bad game, they shouldn’t get labelled as AFKing.
> > > > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > > > >
> > > > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> > > >
> > > > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> > > >
> > > > It is functioning as intended.
> > >
> > > Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
> >
> > Once again, the ban hammer goes of zero kill games, it triggers it for AFKing activity, which you had, bans aren’t overturned because there is no way to differentiate a boosters or an AFKer.
> >
> > If they attempted to go through every ban appeal, they would be there for years.
>
> Okay, but it isn’t fair for the people who just got zero kills and even have proof about it, so what I am saying is that 343 Industries does something about the AFKing ban system because it’s frustrating people who don’t deserve to get banned. I mean, why should it get triggered if someone got zero kills? What if they are just bad or had a bad game, they shouldn’t get labelled as AFKing.
It is either let people go all out & boost with guests & other accounts while they get zero kills, or ban a small amount of players for zero kills to prevent AFKing.
I prefer it now, less AFKing.
It is unlikely the problem will ever be sorted in Reach, not while Halo 4 is this close.
> > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > >
> > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > >
> > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> >
> > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> >
> > It is functioning as intended.
>
> Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
I am going to point out one more element of the game you are talking about:
All other players besides you and 1 other have a relative distance traveled. On top of 0 kills, you also have a relative distance traveled as 0 as well as 0 medals or anything to suggest you were in-game. The banhammer has made the correct judgment call.
> > > > > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> > > > >
> > > > > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is functioning as intended.
> > > >
> > > > Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
> > >
> > > Once again, the ban hammer goes of zero kill games, it triggers it for AFKing activity, which you had, bans aren’t overturned because there is no way to differentiate a boosters or an AFKer.
> > >
> > > If they attempted to go through every ban appeal, they would be there for years.
> >
> > Okay, but it isn’t fair for the people who just got zero kills and even have proof about it, so what I am saying is that 343 Industries does something about the AFKing ban system because it’s frustrating people who don’t deserve to get banned. I mean, why should it get triggered if someone got zero kills? What if they are just bad or had a bad game, they shouldn’t get labelled as AFKing.
>
> It is either let people go all out & boost with guests & other accounts while they get zero kills, or ban a small amount of players for zero kills to prevent AFKing.
>
> I prefer it now, less AFKing.
>
> It is unlikely the problem will ever be sorted in Reach, not while Halo 4 is this close.
How many matches of zero kills are required to get banned? And is this system going to be in Halo 4 as well?
> > > > > > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is functioning as intended.
> > > > >
> > > > > Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
> > > >
> > > > Once again, the ban hammer goes of zero kill games, it triggers it for AFKing activity, which you had, bans aren’t overturned because there is no way to differentiate a boosters or an AFKer.
> > > >
> > > > If they attempted to go through every ban appeal, they would be there for years.
> > >
> > > Okay, but it isn’t fair for the people who just got zero kills and even have proof about it, so what I am saying is that 343 Industries does something about the AFKing ban system because it’s frustrating people who don’t deserve to get banned. I mean, why should it get triggered if someone got zero kills? What if they are just bad or had a bad game, they shouldn’t get labelled as AFKing.
> >
> > It is either let people go all out & boost with guests & other accounts while they get zero kills, or ban a small amount of players for zero kills to prevent AFKing.
> >
> > I prefer it now, less AFKing.
> >
> > It is unlikely the problem will ever be sorted in Reach, not while Halo 4 is this close.
>
> How many matches of zero kills are required to get banned? And is this system going to be in Halo 4 as well?
It can be one, info on the Halo 4 ban hammer is unknown.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is functioning as intended.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
> > > > >
> > > > > Once again, the ban hammer goes of zero kill games, it triggers it for AFKing activity, which you had, bans aren’t overturned because there is no way to differentiate a boosters or an AFKer.
> > > > >
> > > > > If they attempted to go through every ban appeal, they would be there for years.
> > > >
> > > > Okay, but it isn’t fair for the people who just got zero kills and even have proof about it, so what I am saying is that 343 Industries does something about the AFKing ban system because it’s frustrating people who don’t deserve to get banned. I mean, why should it get triggered if someone got zero kills? What if they are just bad or had a bad game, they shouldn’t get labelled as AFKing.
> > >
> > > It is either let people go all out & boost with guests & other accounts while they get zero kills, or ban a small amount of players for zero kills to prevent AFKing.
> > >
> > > I prefer it now, less AFKing.
> > >
> > > It is unlikely the problem will ever be sorted in Reach, not while Halo 4 is this close.
> >
> > How many matches of zero kills are required to get banned? And is this system going to be in Halo 4 as well?
>
> It can be one, info on the Halo 4 ban hammer is unknown.
It should atleast be 2-3 matches in a row where you get zero kills that you get banned, because like my situation, 1 match is a bit overboard.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It is functioning as intended.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Once again, the ban hammer goes of zero kill games, it triggers it for AFKing activity, which you had, bans aren’t overturned because there is no way to differentiate a boosters or an AFKer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If they attempted to go through every ban appeal, they would be there for years.
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, but it isn’t fair for the people who just got zero kills and even have proof about it, so what I am saying is that 343 Industries does something about the AFKing ban system because it’s frustrating people who don’t deserve to get banned. I mean, why should it get triggered if someone got zero kills? What if they are just bad or had a bad game, they shouldn’t get labelled as AFKing.
> > > >
> > > > It is either let people go all out & boost with guests & other accounts while they get zero kills, or ban a small amount of players for zero kills to prevent AFKing.
> > > >
> > > > I prefer it now, less AFKing.
> > > >
> > > > It is unlikely the problem will ever be sorted in Reach, not while Halo 4 is this close.
> > >
> > > How many matches of zero kills are required to get banned? And is this system going to be in Halo 4 as well?
> >
> > It can be one, info on the Halo 4 ban hammer is unknown.
>
> It should atleast be 2-3 matches in a row where you get zero kills that you get banned, because like my situation, 1 match is a bit overboard.
Like I said, it is unlikely anything will be changed for Reach.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You were banned due to AFKing activity in this game: Grifball on Erora
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really? To be honest, I don’t re-call AFKing in Grifball, unless I was away for a bit of the match, but just that leads to 2 week ban for credits?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Past bans make future bans last longer, considering you said you have been banned in the past, this one was longer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Like I said, it was AFKing activity, it may have not been AFK but the ban hammer picked it up as so.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Well, is there a way to shorten or do something about, because I am sorry but I am almost 100% positive that I wasn’t AFKing in Grifball?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Like I said once again, the ban hammer picked you up for AFKing activity, there is no way to reverse it, the bans are automatic, the last time 343i intervened with the ban hammer was when it began to falsely ban people doing Custom Challenges, and that was a few months ago.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I’m sorry for bringing this up again, but I downloaded the match I had on Erora and I didn’t AFK at all. Is there a way where you can see it for yourself just so I can justify that the automated banhammer is malfunctioning?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The ban hammer goes solely off zero kill games for AFKing activity, the game had a final result of you with zero kills and multiple deaths.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It is functioning as intended.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Wait, so I am not going to be unbanned? You even saw yourself that I was actually playing, I just had a bad game!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Once again, the ban hammer goes of zero kill games, it triggers it for AFKing activity, which you had, bans aren’t overturned because there is no way to differentiate a boosters or an AFKer.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If they attempted to go through every ban appeal, they would be there for years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Okay, but it isn’t fair for the people who just got zero kills and even have proof about it, so what I am saying is that 343 Industries does something about the AFKing ban system because it’s frustrating people who don’t deserve to get banned. I mean, why should it get triggered if someone got zero kills? What if they are just bad or had a bad game, they shouldn’t get labelled as AFKing.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is either let people go all out & boost with guests & other accounts while they get zero kills, or ban a small amount of players for zero kills to prevent AFKing.
> > > > >
> > > > > I prefer it now, less AFKing.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is unlikely the problem will ever be sorted in Reach, not while Halo 4 is this close.
> > > >
> > > > How many matches of zero kills are required to get banned? And is this system going to be in Halo 4 as well?
> > >
> > > It can be one, info on the Halo 4 ban hammer is unknown.
> >
> > It should atleast be 2-3 matches in a row where you get zero kills that you get banned, because like my situation, 1 match is a bit overboard.
>
> Like I said, it is unlikely anything will be changed for Reach.
I know, I mean for Halo 4 at least.
What is AKFing?
AFK: Away from keyboard but for halo replace keyboard for controller.
I just bought an Xbox 360 last night and got the download with Halo Reach on it and now it says that we are banned to earn any credits why is this?
So much reading… Why so long?