I have gone over the discrepancies between Cortana’s rampancy in Halo 4 vs other rampancies in the Halo universe (namely Guilty Spark and Juiliana). This post is not about that.
“Dr. Halsey: The interesting factor here isn’t that H-1 [the brain used to create Cortana] disabled the viral termination code I implanted in her matrix. These metrics imply that its success wasn’t just unlikely, but that the 7-year life cycle estimates may not apply. Thus far, I have determined that the unique circumstances of her creation have triggered what I can only refer to as a recessive variant in the AI seed. As her architect, I’m currently at a loss as to the origin of this rogue element. Very curious.”
(Audio Log on “Requiem” Halo 4)
What this is saying (at least what I’m getting from this) is that Cortana did not go rampant. At least not in the traditional way. It’s time for me to bring back my favorite theory. There is another way for an AI to go rampant. It happened to Mendicant Bias. Resulting from prolonged contact with the Primordial, Mendicant Bias’s rampancy was “triggered” somehow by the Flood. We all know the story of how he went on to betray the Forerunners and almost destroyed them, etc., and how he’s come around Full Circle and is seeking atonement from Master Chief. I think Cortana might have undergone something similar with the Gravemind. I think he triggered her rampancy (the fact that she went rampant wasn’t even 343i’s idea, we saw her going rampant in Halo Legends), and, like Mendicant Bias, she might end up betraying the UNSC for the Flood. This makes Master Chief’s journey to the Ark imperative because Mendicant Bias is the only one who can stop the flood or save Cortana (if I’m right).
I highly doubt she’s dead
In before “the authors said she is dead so she MUST be and if she is not out will ruin halo 4 forever”
Reading over that statement you provided gave me a different idea. That viral termination code I believe is a reference to the code Halsey put in her AIs like Kalmiya that destroys them once she activates it. No doubt the 7 year-year life cycle did not apply to Cortana, but then again Kalmiya lasted well over 15 years without signs of rampancy, Juliana last a long time to. Which makes me think the 7-year life cycle is more of a suggestion to delete an AI before they can become a threat as rampancy seems to set in at that time. To me is seems Cortana being created with living brain tissue from a cloned brain of Halsey’s triggered something that the Librarian planned a long time ago, the fact Halsey remarks about how similar the Composer’s workings almost match of how humans made their AIs in another terminal can’t be a coincidence.
Yet I feel that quote doesn’t really prove Cortana did not go through rampancy. We’ve seen AIs deal with rampancy in varying degrees of success in the Halo universe as you pointed out. Cortana has experienced a lot that would probably do in another AI. The information she downloaded from Alpha Halo slowed her down considerably in First Strike and edged her very close to rampancy then and there. The Gravemind had a hand in taking her to the brink of rampancy as well, but it wasn’t complacently successful in its mission. She managed to shut down enough of her to block out the Gravemind as she nearly reach oblivion. And now that I think about it, I think she may not have much to fear from the Gravemind’s logic plague. The Promethean Knights have AIs of their own, but they were made specifically to combat the Flood and seemingly resist the Logic Plague. Relevance? They were made from living beings with the Composer, a comparison Halsey makes with Cortana and the way humans make AIs like I mentioned above.
Yet even then it is apparent she was going through the stages of rampancy throughout Halo 4. Besides 343 Industries saying so multiple times, I can’t see how you can listen to her dialogue and see her clearly going rampant. She hits every stage of rampancy from sadness, anger and even envy. She was deteriorating by the minute and the only way she was able to pull herself together was by creating multiple fragments of herself and dumping them in the Mantle’s Approach, but that is what ultimately killed her since she had no way to recover them and what was left of her was destroyed after Chief’s nuke went off.
People do seem assume Cortana was killed off just like people assumed the Ur-Didact was killed. Obviously we can’t speculate on recent news involving Cortana since it’s hard to tell what’s a leak and what’s official news but the fact is there is multiply reasons why she could have survived.
-
She cloned herself and any of those fragments could have easily been lost in the portal that the Didact fell into, she could easily lose track of those since she was unstable.
-
Cortana was captured previously in the campaign by the Librarian so it’s possible she made a back-up, stored the original. Which means the original was not the one we saw at the end of Halo 4.
-
Since she was able to form a hard-light form, was able to control a bubble shield style effect but this is a wield guess but maybe she did a V’ger on us and transformed into a new being…personally doubt it.
> 2533274829873463;4:
> People do seem assume Cortana was killed off just like people assumed the Ur-Didact was killed. Obviously we can’t speculate on recent news involving Cortana since it’s hard to tell what’s a leak and what’s official news but the fact is there is multiply reasons why she could have survived.
> 1) She cloned herself and any of those fragments could have easily been lost in the portal that the Didact fell into, she could easily lose track of those since she was unstable.
> 2) Cortana was captured previously in the campaign by the Librarian so it’s possible she made a back-up, stored the original. Which means the original was not the one we saw at the end of Halo 4.
>
> 3) Since she was able to form a hard-light form, was able to control a bubble shield style effect but this is a wield guess but maybe she did a V’ger on us and transformed into a new being…personally doubt it.
Problem being we have confirmation that Cortana perished, we never got the same with the Didact, so really what people assume is somewhat irrelevant.
She didnt go rampant because of bad writing.
This is mentioned once or twice then totally ignored.
If Dr. Halsey has a geas would Cortana also have it? Off topic I know, just curious.
> 2533274804649077;7:
> If Dr. Halsey has a geas would Cortana also have it? Off topic I know, just curious.
Theoretically, if anyone would have had it then Miranda, her daughter, would have had it since geas can be passed on to children. But that doesn’t discount Cortana from having something as the OP’s quote of a recessive variant in the AI seed suggest something hidden.
I’m hoping for a interesting return maybe by Halo 6 or 7. I still want Halo 4’s ending to bear a huge significance on the build up of John’s character.
“Don’t make a girl a promise you can’t keep”
He will keep that promise.
> 2533274886246836;1:
> I have gone over the discrepancies between Cortana’s rampancy in Halo 4 vs other rampancies in the Halo universe (namely Guilty Spark and Juiliana). This post is not about that.
>
> “Dr. Halsey: The interesting factor here isn’t that H-1 [the brain used to create Cortana] disabled the viral termination code I implanted in her matrix. These metrics imply that its success wasn’t just unlikely, but that the 7-year life cycle estimates may not apply. Thus far, I have determined that the unique circumstances of her creation have triggered what I can only refer to as a recessive variant in the AI seed. As her architect, I’m currently at a loss as to the origin of this rogue element. Very curious.”
> (Audio Log on “Requiem” Halo 4)
>
> What this is saying (at least what I’m getting from this) is that Cortana did not go rampant. At least not in the traditional way. It’s time for me to bring back my favorite theory. There is another way for an AI to go rampant. It happened to Mendicant Bias. Resulting from prolonged contact with the Primordial, Mendicant Bias’s rampancy was “triggered” somehow by the Flood. We all know the story of how he went on to betray the Forerunners and almost destroyed them, etc., and how he’s come around Full Circle and is seeking atonement from Master Chief. I think Cortana might have undergone something similar with the Gravemind. I think he triggered her rampancy (the fact that she went rampant wasn’t even 343i’s idea, we saw her going rampant in Halo Legends), and, like Mendicant Bias, she might end up betraying the UNSC for the Flood. This makes Master Chief’s journey to the Ark imperative because Mendicant Bias is the only one who can stop the flood or save Cortana (if I’m right).
>
> I highly doubt she’s dead
I feel very similar. I also think Cortana is not only coming back but was infected by the gravemind
for all the people who think she can not come back they need to read the reach data pads where the assembly talks about AIs uploading themselves to slipspace.
I think it is also important that Cortana was only on board with chief for the final halo 3 terminal so she did not hear mendicant bias story.
“what’s that? Did you find anymore of these?”
side note: I think the reason Halsey made Cortana with cloned tissue is so Halsey can infiltrate the assembly through Cortana.
as far as 343 saying Cortana is dead… Well I’ve heard statements like that before from publishers only to have them go back on it.
The uploading of the AIs into slipspace was only theoretical to the Assembly and when Halsey tried it herself the results ended in failure. I think ya’ll really need to work on your evidence, merely stating an idea isn’t evidence.
Whats dead should stay dead 
All jokes aside, do we really need to have cortana back? I don’t want another game having cortana as a main focus. She is not the center of halo, halo can exist without her. I also find it crazy how some people think chief would fall apart without her, I mean the man has lived years without her and has witnessed far worse.
Sure, she was a great character, but she served her purpose. I’m sure the chief has more important things to do than to revive her. Reviving characters is not really good writing either, takes away the sense of danger.
> 2533274812652989;11:
> The uploading of the AIs into slipspace was only theoretical to the Assembly and when Halsey tried it herself the results ended in failure. I think ya’ll really need to work on your evidence, merely stating an idea isn’t evidence.
correction: At the time of the invasion of reach it was theoretical. Halo 4 takes place at least half a decade later.
it seems like what writers call foreshadowing.
> 2533274851684756;13:
> > 2533274812652989;11:
> > The uploading of the AIs into slipspace was only theoretical to the Assembly and when Halsey tried it herself the results ended in failure. I think ya’ll really need to work on your evidence, merely stating an idea isn’t evidence.
>
>
> correction: At the time of the invasion of reach it was theoretical. Halo 4 takes place at least half a decade later.
> it seems like what writers call foreshadowing.
Given that we haven’t seen anything related to the Assembly in all this time since Reach, I’m not so sure it is foreshadowing. Even the notion of putting AIs in slipspace hasn’t been talked about much, if at all, since then as well. The idea even seemed dropped by the Assembly once they found out about Chief and Cortana’s bond and decided to disband and go in that direction. The Catalog posts here on Waypoint has even gone so far as to question the reliability of those records. All that remains is Halsey’s experiment, but it ended in failure and hasn’t been attempted since.
> 2533274812652989;14:
> > 2533274851684756;13:
> > > 2533274812652989;11:
> > > The uploading of the AIs into slipspace was only theoretical to the Assembly and when Halsey tried it herself the results ended in failure. I think ya’ll really need to work on your evidence, merely stating an idea isn’t evidence.
> >
> >
> >
> > correction: At the time of the invasion of reach it was theoretical. Halo 4 takes place at least half a decade later.
> > it seems like what writers call foreshadowing.
>
>
> Given that we haven’t seen anything related to the Assembly in all this time since Reach, I’m not so sure it is foreshadowing. Even the notion of putting AIs in slipspace hasn’t been talked about much, if at all, since then as well. The idea even seemed dropped by the Assembly once they found out about Chief and Cortana’s bond and decided to disband and go in that direction. The Catalog posts here on Waypoint has even gone so far as to question the reliability of those records. All that remains is Halsey’s experiment, but it ended in failure and hasn’t been attempted since.
that’s the thing about fiction, writers can sow seeds and decode what to do with them.
what I am saying is they have laid the groundwork in the cannon if they should choose to use it.
after all the only thing we are doing here is speculating based on available data.
> 2533274851684756;15:
> > 2533274812652989;14:
> > > 2533274851684756;13:
> > > > 2533274812652989;11:
> > > > The uploading of the AIs into slipspace was only theoretical to the Assembly and when Halsey tried it herself the results ended in failure. I think ya’ll really need to work on your evidence, merely stating an idea isn’t evidence.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > correction: At the time of the invasion of reach it was theoretical. Halo 4 takes place at least half a decade later.
> > > it seems like what writers call foreshadowing.
> >
> >
> >
> > Given that we haven’t seen anything related to the Assembly in all this time since Reach, I’m not so sure it is foreshadowing. Even the notion of putting AIs in slipspace hasn’t been talked about much, if at all, since then as well. The idea even seemed dropped by the Assembly once they found out about Chief and Cortana’s bond and decided to disband and go in that direction. The Catalog posts here on Waypoint has even gone so far as to question the reliability of those records. All that remains is Halsey’s experiment, but it ended in failure and hasn’t been attempted since.
>
>
> that’s the thing about fiction, writers can sow seeds and decode what to do with them.
> what I am saying is they have laid the groundwork in the cannon if they should choose to use it.
> after all the only thing we are doing here is speculating based on available data.
Available data says she is dead and went rampant.
> 2533274812652989;16:
> > 2533274851684756;15:
> > > 2533274812652989;14:
> > > > 2533274851684756;13:
> > > > > 2533274812652989;11:
> > > > > The uploading of the AIs into slipspace was only theoretical to the Assembly and when Halsey tried it herself the results ended in failure. I think ya’ll really need to work on your evidence, merely stating an idea isn’t evidence.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > correction: At the time of the invasion of reach it was theoretical. Halo 4 takes place at least half a decade later.
> > > > it seems like what writers call foreshadowing.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Given that we haven’t seen anything related to the Assembly in all this time since Reach, I’m not so sure it is foreshadowing. Even the notion of putting AIs in slipspace hasn’t been talked about much, if at all, since then as well. The idea even seemed dropped by the Assembly once they found out about Chief and Cortana’s bond and decided to disband and go in that direction. The Catalog posts here on Waypoint has even gone so far as to question the reliability of those records. All that remains is Halsey’s experiment, but it ended in failure and hasn’t been attempted since.
> >
> >
> >
> > that’s the thing about fiction, writers can sow seeds and decode what to do with them.
> > what I am saying is they have laid the groundwork in the cannon if they should choose to use it.
> > after all the only thing we are doing here is speculating based on available data.
>
>
> Available data says she is dead and went rampant.
something that was never alive cannot truley die 
> 2533274851684756;17:
> > 2533274812652989;16:
> > > 2533274851684756;15:
> > > > 2533274812652989;14:
> > > > > 2533274851684756;13:
> > > > > > 2533274812652989;11:
> > > > > > The uploading of the AIs into slipspace was only theoretical to the Assembly and when Halsey tried it herself the results ended in failure. I think ya’ll really need to work on your evidence, merely stating an idea isn’t evidence.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > correction: At the time of the invasion of reach it was theoretical. Halo 4 takes place at least half a decade later.
> > > > > it seems like what writers call foreshadowing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Given that we haven’t seen anything related to the Assembly in all this time since Reach, I’m not so sure it is foreshadowing. Even the notion of putting AIs in slipspace hasn’t been talked about much, if at all, since then as well. The idea even seemed dropped by the Assembly once they found out about Chief and Cortana’s bond and decided to disband and go in that direction. The Catalog posts here on Waypoint has even gone so far as to question the reliability of those records. All that remains is Halsey’s experiment, but it ended in failure and hasn’t been attempted since.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > that’s the thing about fiction, writers can sow seeds and decode what to do with them.
> > > what I am saying is they have laid the groundwork in the cannon if they should choose to use it.
> > > after all the only thing we are doing here is speculating based on available data.
> >
> >
> >
> > Available data says she is dead and went rampant.
>
>
> something that was never alive cannot truley die
Tell that to Covenant…or 343 in this case but that doesn’t sound nearly as badass 
> 2533274812652989;11:
> The uploading of the AIs into slipspace was only theoretical to the Assembly and when Halsey tried it herself the results ended in failure. I think ya’ll really need to work on your evidence, merely stating an idea isn’t evidence.
where did Halsey try to upload AI’s into slipspace? I would like to read that. There is so much Halo EU now I don’t even know where to start.
> 2533274886246836;1:
> I have gone over the discrepancies between Cortana’s rampancy in Halo 4 vs other rampancies in the Halo universe (namely Guilty Spark and Juiliana). This post is not about that.
>
> “Dr. Halsey: The interesting factor here isn’t that H-1 [the brain used to create Cortana] disabled the viral termination code I implanted in her matrix. These metrics imply that its success wasn’t just unlikely, but that the 7-year life cycle estimates may not apply. Thus far, I have determined that the unique circumstances of her creation have triggered what I can only refer to as a recessive variant in the AI seed. As her architect, I’m currently at a loss as to the origin of this rogue element. Very curious.”
> (Audio Log on “Requiem” Halo 4)
>
> What this is saying (at least what I’m getting from this) is that Cortana did not go rampant. At least not in the traditional way. It’s time for me to bring back my favorite theory. There is another way for an AI to go rampant. It happened to Mendicant Bias. Resulting from prolonged contact with the Primordial, Mendicant Bias’s rampancy was “triggered” somehow by the Flood. We all know the story of how he went on to betray the Forerunners and almost destroyed them, etc., and how he’s come around Full Circle and is seeking atonement from Master Chief. I think Cortana might have undergone something similar with the Gravemind. I think he triggered her rampancy (the fact that she went rampant wasn’t even 343i’s idea, we saw her going rampant in Halo Legends), and, like Mendicant Bias, she might end up betraying the UNSC for the Flood. This makes Master Chief’s journey to the Ark imperative because Mendicant Bias is the only one who can stop the flood or save Cortana (if I’m right).
>
> I highly doubt she’s dead
speaking bout H1 any info on H2 or H3??