<mark>This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not post about forum moderation decisions. If you have a question or concern about a forum moderation decision, please private message the applicable moderator.</mark>
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
Why do the moderators on this forum site entirely change what ppl say Im a topic post and make up lies in order to change what the uploader actually originally typed?
For example, I saw an upload posted earlier where a person made an anti halo4 post in combination with a pro halo reach post. And after the moderator got hold of it he changed the entire post making it look like it was pro halo4 and anti halo reach.
Why are the Moderators trying to convince everyone that halo4 was graphically amazing and that halo reach was terrible when if was the other way around?!
Halo reach lacked forunner structures and pretty things I’ll admit that BUT if 343 took the realistic approach that halo reach incorporates and took it to the next level by combining it with pretty forunner art like what’s shown in halo2 anniversary u would have the perfect balance.
I agree with the other uploader, maps like Boneyard were all fan favourites in reach because of it’s realism mixed with Sci Fi scenery.
It sort of reminds me of the concept they used for h2A’s remaster now known as “Shrine” realistic but Sci Fi. The colour and brightness weren’t too overboard and everything fit but he was right when he said we need some more dull gloomy maps that look like there had revently been a big war between the humans an Covi and there’s wear and tear everywhere and inclement weather in the sky from all the pollution and un rest.
I just can’t work out why there would be such babies running this page.
I even just saw someone else agree that reach was on the right path in terms of art style with maps like Boneyard etc however this person stated that a splash of halo4 mixed in with reach would have been a nice balance and the moderator came in again and typed a reply saying halo4 and halo5s graphics and Spartans look more real than halo reaches and that halo reach looked all cartoony compared to halo 4 etc etc and then banned both ppl who disagreed with the moderator and then tried to lie to everyone and say that the two ppl who agreed on halo reaches graphics were in fact the same person and that’s how he justified banning them. I’m sure I’ll probably cop the same treatment for typing this post.
MAKES ME QUESTION AS TO WHAT INFORMATION 343 ACTUALLY RECIEVED FROM THESE FORUMS WITH MODERATORS AND ADMINS LIKE THESE IMMATURE BABYISH CARTOONY LOVING CLOWNS RUNNING THE SHOW.