Edited by Moderator - Please refrain from making nonconstructive posts.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
the reason why 343 is failing and people are baging on this game is because they simply dont listen to what the community wants.Like this is what majority of the community wants no sprint a hard to use sniper no armor abilities good maps in game ranks no more agl just do mlg and no grenade indicators less aim assist no custom classes just keep it original so how do i know people want these thing is because thats what made halo unique in the first place and i was sold and played more than cod.The only thing halo 4 has over any halo is sales and that because of previews but nobodies on the severs so go back to what made it sucessful take of sprint in halo 5 just try the things i listed ashore you will double your money after a month when word gets out and give a beta o and for any kid that says adapt to whats new on this game called halo 4 charles darwin sayed it best its not the smartest that survives its not the strongest its the one thats most adaptable to change so take halo and put it in a percentage of the community 60 percent the competitive 40 percent the non comppetitve which is bigger
> How did you manage to write that whole thing in 3 sentences.
I know of a man from ancient times who was able to do that.
OT: They did not fail, they merely made their first game. From this one, they can draw on their experience to make an even better one.
There’s a lot of assumptions in this post, but I will say the reason they weren’t able to hold a decent player base was because they did not know the difference between accessibility and making a game easy. That lack of knowledge led to flinch, perks, sprint, and current ordnance drops. There is still a lot of learning for them to do, and I’d like to think that halo 4 mp not holding a lot of players is the reason halo 5 will be better.
AA’s can work just fine if implemented correctly. They’re used in competitive settings.
Loadouts aren’t all that bad. I like starting with a BR instead of vetoing for BR’s.
The majority of the population isn’t made up of the competitive community.
Sprint isn’t a game killer although it would be nice to be able to turn it off. It’s perfectly fine for big team.
Rong isn’t a word.
Descope would fix the sniper issue.
This is just another unreadable opinion rant where you seem to know what every other player in the game wants…you don’t.
But wait, there’s more.
No one cares if it’s MLG, ALG, KFC, or QFC. All that matters is the prize money involved. Since the H4GC it’s obvious that 343/Microsoft is going to invest some money into the e-sports side of Halo in the future.
The only thing I blame 343 for is their decision to hire Certain Affinity to make the entire multi-player of this game and to try and make Halo “accessible”.
Edited by Moderator - Please do not flame/attack others.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
well if you put it that way ur just another 343 d rider who thinks sprint makes the game better and honestly if it went back to halo 3 ways you wont survive
> well if you put it that way ur just another 343 d rider who thinks sprint makes the game better and honestly if it went back to halo 3 ways you wont survive
He never said it made the game better, he says it would be fine if turned off, and that he does not mind it. I barely notice.
Is it because its a bad game? Because it’s not, especially after all the updates it’s received.
Is it because it doesn’t have the pop numbers of H3? Because that was never going to happen. CoD is much more popular than it was during H3. There are also more and better games competing for players attention than there were during H3.
By all reasonable accounts H4 is a success. At this point in its life time it has sold more than any other game in the series. It has favorable reviews and it has a bunch of industry awards.