halo 4 had the potential to blow all halo games out of the water. unfortunately 343 has other plans. halo4 has the most glitches of any game ive ever played online. it kicks people back to the lobby at random,changes loadouts at random ,and has more lag per game to make anyone give up. 343 Get you ship together! this is pathetic. the infinity challenge is a joke under these circumstances. i guess they dont pay 343 enough to worry about the players. btw how crazy is it that they release dlc maps before they have impact,erosion,and ravine available for play in matchmaking. i guess i know the answer. MONEY. MONEY.MONEY.
Bungie is busy making a game that’s gonna blow Halo out of the water. Hopefully.
Working on Destiny, definitely looks very promising.
> Working on Destiny, definitely looks very promising.
Just looked it up. Looks like it’s gonna be great!
maybe bungie can give 343 some hints on how to make multiplayer a playable expierence.
It may just be me, but this never happens to me. Try using a wired connection.
I’m pretty sure Bungie gave us the middle finger with Reach.
> halo 4 had the potential to blow all halo games out of the water. unfortunately 343 has other plans. <mark>halo4 has the most glitches of any game ive ever played online</mark>. it kicks people back to the lobby at random,changes loadouts at random ,and has more lag per game to make anyone give up. 343 Get you ship together! this is pathetic. the infinity challenge is a joke under these circumstances. i guess they dont pay 343 enough to worry about the players. btw how crazy is it that they release dlc maps before they have impact,erosion,and ravine available for play in matchmaking. i guess i know the answer. MONEY. MONEY.MONEY.
You must not have played many games then.
> I’m pretty sure Bungie gave us the middle finger with Reach.
Nope, ODST and Reach were games that Bungie didn’t even want to do. They wanted to end it with H3, but under contract had to produce 2 more games. If anything, Bungie was giving Microsoft the middle finger with Reach
> > I’m pretty sure Bungie gave us the middle finger with Reach.
>
> Nope, ODST and Reach were games that Bungie didn’t even want to do. They wanted to end it with H3, but under contract had to produce 2 more games. If anything, Bungie was giving Microsoft the middle finger with Reach
Either way, Halo Reach isn’t all that enjoyable to play.
> I’m pretty sure Bungie gave us the middle finger with Reach.
So does that mean that 343 shoved said finger in our butts when they released Halo 4?
> > > I’m pretty sure Bungie gave us the middle finger with Reach.
> >
> > Nope, <mark>ODST and Reach were games that Bungie didn’t even want to do</mark>. They wanted to end it with H3, but under contract had to produce 2 more games. If anything, Bungie was giving Microsoft the middle finger with Reach
>
> Either way, Halo Reach isn’t all that enjoyable to play.
Did you miss that part? Why would they put there heart and soul into a game that they don’t care about?
Are you done crying? I’m staying with 343, simply for the fact that they haven’t screwed me over on anything as of yet. It’s their first game, for the love of God, have some brains!!
I actually don’t often have these problems. Also, the lag is your connection, as well as your piers.
> > > > I’m pretty sure Bungie gave us the middle finger with Reach.
> > >
> > > Nope, <mark>ODST and Reach were games that Bungie didn’t even want to do</mark>. They wanted to end it with H3, but under contract had to produce 2 more games. If anything, Bungie was giving Microsoft the middle finger with Reach
> >
> > Either way, Halo Reach isn’t all that enjoyable to play.
>
> Did you miss that part? Why would they put there heart and soul into a game that they don’t care about?
No, they weren’t on contract to make two games, they were on contract until around last year or the beginning of this year then they officially broke off. They could have just made Reach without ODST, they weren’t required to make it a full game.
Anyway, why would you pay $60 for a game you know the dev doesn’t even care about? That just confirms that they gave us the finger with Reach.
> > > > > I’m pretty sure Bungie gave us the middle finger with Reach.
> > > >
> > > > Nope, <mark>ODST and Reach were games that Bungie didn’t even want to do</mark>. They wanted to end it with H3, but under contract had to produce 2 more games. If anything, Bungie was giving Microsoft the middle finger with Reach
> > >
> > > Either way, Halo Reach isn’t all that enjoyable to play.
> >
> > Did you miss that part? Why would they put there heart and soul into a game that they don’t care about?
>
> No, they weren’t on contract to make two games, they were on contract until around last year or the beginning of this year then they officially broke off. They could have just made Reach without ODST, they weren’t required to make it a full game.
>
> Anyway, why would you pay $60 for a game you know the dev doesn’t even care about? That just confirms that they gave us the finger with Reach.
It is pretty obvious that 343 only cares about the green. They release a map pack 1 month after the games release. I mean come on, you can not be this blinded by the 343 light.
> halo 4 had the potential to blow all halo games out of the water. unfortunately 343 has other plans. halo4 has the most glitches of any game ive ever played online. it kicks people back to the lobby at random,changes loadouts at random ,and has more lag per game to make anyone give up. 343 Get you ship together! this is pathetic. the infinity challenge is a joke under these circumstances. i guess they dont pay 343 enough to worry about the players. btw how crazy is it that they release dlc maps before they have impact,erosion,and ravine available for play in matchmaking. i guess i know the answer. MONEY. MONEY.MONEY.
Bungie is probably making Halo Reach: Armor Lock Bloom 2
now you can spend the entire game in AL and the DMR reticle starts off the same size as full bloom…but now gets bigger!!!
> Are you done crying? I’m staying with 343, simply for the fact that they haven’t screwed me over on anything as of yet. It’s their first game, for the love of God, have some brains!!
Your one of the few…
Many have been screwed over real cash by them.
Destiny is looking good, I hope it’s great! I don’t get the hate for Reach. Sure it was irritating at times and it was about as close to competitive as a potato but it was fun most of the time. Much better than Halo 4 IMO.
(PS: I’ve liked Reach since the beginning, not since I wanted to make a point like many think)
> > > > > > I’m pretty sure Bungie gave us the middle finger with Reach.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nope, <mark>ODST and Reach were games that Bungie didn’t even want to do</mark>. They wanted to end it with H3, but under contract had to produce 2 more games. If anything, Bungie was giving Microsoft the middle finger with Reach
> > > >
> > > > Either way, Halo Reach isn’t all that enjoyable to play.
> > >
> > > Did you miss that part? Why would they put there heart and soul into a game that they don’t care about?
> >
> > No, they weren’t on contract to make two games, they were on contract until around last year or the beginning of this year then they officially broke off. They could have just made Reach without ODST, they weren’t required to make it a full game.
> >
> > Anyway, why would you pay $60 for a game you know the dev doesn’t even care about? That just confirms that they gave us the finger with Reach.
>
> <mark>It is pretty obvious that 343 only cares about the green</mark>. They release a map pack 1 month after the games release. I mean come on, you can not be this blinded by the 343 light.
These statements piss me off so bad it’s not even funny. So what? People were begging for new maps and look, they got them, and that’s your reply?
You’re being so ignorant I don’t even know why i’m wasting my breath on you.
they have only released a few screen shots. so how does it look so promising? jw i wanna know if they released more stuff or not