What would make you not like Halo 4?

For me,
Bloom
Loadouts
Non-pickup AA
Slow player speed
Low jump height
A bad campaign
Really though, i want this campaign to be amazing. The first trilogy is one of the best narratives ever told in Gameing history in my opinion (besides bioshock)

So thoughts???

being similar to reach.

That being said, I love reach.

Its just halo 1 to halo 2 was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)
halo 2 to halo 3 was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)
halo 3 to halo reach was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)

so in my mind: halo 4 should be a vast change, a new game, and something that has a lot of replay value

If they change the Chief or mess with the canon too much.

It may be a cliche by now but in truth…Armor Lock. shivers

> being similar to reach.
>
> That being said, I love reach.
>
> Its just halo 1 to halo 2 was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)
> halo 2 to halo 3 was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)
> <mark>halo 3 to halo reach was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)</mark>
>
> so in my mind: halo 4 should be a vast change, a new game, and something that has a lot of replay value

Exactly, its not that Reach “sucked” like most of these kids say, its just not the same as Halo 3 and they need to realise that if they like halo 3 that much then they need to play it, stop saying Reach is no good just because its DIFFERENT than what they were used to.

Flood
“reunited” Covenant
dumb story lacking objective
being way to Similar to previous games

-ranking system that isnt skill-based (no highest skill)
-a short campaign
-unnecessary classes
-if team play is unimportant (if winning or losing doesnt matter)

> Flood

I’m pretty confident that there will be flood. They are kind of a big deal in the Halo universe.

> > Flood
>
> I’m pretty confident that there will be flood. They are kind of a big deal in the Halo universe.

hopefully if there are not in a big role, that would be making Halo 3’s ending pointless if they are loose again as a threat for the third time, we already dealed with the Flood in the last trilogy and i hope for something new in the Reclaimer Trilogy.

If there’s no BETA

messing with the canon

adding a new and completly diffrent ost

the chief being a cry baby

Chief being disrespected (by 343)

A campaign as disappointing as Reach

Gimmicky multiplayer

> > > Flood
> >
> > I’m pretty confident that there will be flood. They are kind of a big deal in the Halo universe.
>
> hopefully if there are not in a big role, that would be making Halo 3’s ending pointless if they are loose again as a threat for the third time, we already dealed with the Flood in the last trilogy and i hope for something new in the Reclaimer Trilogy.

I suppose you can hope for them not appearing in Halo 4 (probably will), but they are going to return in the next trilogy.

Look at it this way… The flood we faced in the original trilogy was minor.
The forerunners had to destroy everything to stop the flood, yet one man and an AI as able to handle the flood fairly easy. We obviously didn’t face a very threating stage of the flood.
Expect a much better flood to combat in the games ahead (:

>

If the mid range rifle became the most dominating weapon of the sandbox.

Removal of Equipment/AAs.

> being similar to reach.
>
> That being said, I love reach.
>
> Its just halo 1 to halo 2 was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)
> halo 2 to halo 3 was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)
> halo 3 to halo reach was a vast change (for better or worse whatever your opinion)
>
> so in my mind: halo 4 should be a vast change, a new game, and something that has a lot of replay value

Agree, and thanked. I want it too be more Halo than the last one. For everybody that means something different. In my opinion it means more halo, a new and alien gameplay too figure out.

Methew Also a good idea, mid range weapons have always played a key role, i wonder how it would be like if it had a minor role.

If the Covie races don’t show up in Halo 4… I’ll cry. (inside)

> If there’s no BETA

Agreed. Not only It helps 343 with the game, but once the game is released, there’s no excitement because you’ve seen enough of the game and once you pick up the actual full game, your not that excited.

If there’s still a problem with the game after It’s release, they can go ahead and release a Title update. The only thing I want 343 to do is NOT rush the development of this game and releasing bunch of updates after It’s release date. Because constant updates in a week will consider this game ‘BROKEN’. Lack of Finalized coding and such. I believe this was a problem with MW3? Yeah. Don’t follow those steps 343.

Pretty much the things listed in the OP.

I think just changing stuff for no reason would irk me the most. I can’t stand the Chiefs armor in the H4 trailer, not only does it make no sense whatsoever but it looks absolutely terrible. MC looked great in H2/3 and his armor is iconic, I just feel they changed it for the hell of it.

Just imagine you saw iconic characters changed for no reason? Mario with no mustache. Darth Vader now has a kilt. Captain Kirk has a big bushy beard. It feels like that to me. Pointless and a bad idea.

I know its a trailer and there was a lot of artistic license… but why was there artistic license at all?

the flood in campaign.