what is your least favorite work of Halo lore?

Its just what the title says, What is your least favourite work of Halo Lore? It can be Books (like Fall of Reach), Comics *(like Escalation) or movies/Tv shows (like Nightfall and Legends.) the reason this is not a poll is because there are so many it would be hard to do as a poll and Other would probably win.

EDIT: I did not make this very clear but I did not mean the Games (mostly due to me not seeing Games as the lore because they are what the lore supplements, also everyone will just say Halo 5 because it had a bad story.)

.I would say my least Favorite would be the Kilo-Five Trilogy by Karen Traviss. My Reason for this is the portrayal of Halsey. By portrayal of Halsey I mean the Halsey hate. I had a incredible dislike of the fact that Karen had rewritten earlier works of the Halo franchise most notably Fall of Reach by Eric Nylund. a Notable part when she did this was when she wrote that Dr Halsey had lied to the Spartans that their Parents let them be taken where as in Fall of Reach Halsey decided to tell the Spartans the truth so there would not be a revolt if they found out. The Kilo-Five Trilogy has its good points but the amount of Halsey hate and the rewriting of earlier works overshadowed the good points for me causing me to dislike this series.
Edit numero 2: okay I forgot to say this but Kilo-Five is in order Grasslands, Thursday war and Moral Dicata.

‘Halo 5’

  • disjointed narrative
  • inconsistent with prior lore and narrative set-up
  • cliché that came out of nowhere
  • zero character devlopment
  • highly questionable themes
  • ridiculously uneven campaign split
  • blatant false advertising/lies from devlopers

> 2533274920039666;2:
> ‘Halo 5’
> - disjointed narrative
> - inconsistent with prior lore and narrative set-up
> - cliché that came out of nowhere
> - zero character devlopment
> - highly questionable themes
> - ridiculously uneven campaign split
> - blatant false advertising/lies from devlopers

I was thinking more of everything but the games but yeah halo 5 failed in the story regard horribly.

Um, well, this is a very hard question to answer. There is so much media out there that is canon to Halo, so trying to narrow it down to one piece of said media is very conflicting for me. Especially when I love every aspect of the Halo universe. And yes, that means Halo 5.

But if if I had to narrow it down truly to one piece of media, and this is by no means saying it’s bad or not enjoyable to experience, it’d have to be Halo Wars Genesis. It serves its purpose as a sort of ‘prologue’ if you will to Halo Wars and sets up the Characters’ traits and origins. And it offers those small lore details in both the literary and visual sense. But, it’s just kinda there, and easily forgotten. I don’t know how to put it honestly. I enjoy reading it over again when I feel like going through portions of the Canon order or the whole thing itself, but of all the canonical media out there, it takes the cake on being the most “boring” piece of lore for me personally.

If I had to be really honest when it comes to ‘boring’ canon, and I don’t know if I could classify this as a “piece of media,” but learning and trying to memorize our own world history (since it too is canon) is very daunting many a time.

Sincerely,
p1ay4OURFUN

Halo 5 campaign. By far.
Not enough Chief action
The best moments were in the cutscenes
No split screen.

Hm, I’d probably say Halo: Escalation’s “The Next 72 Hours”. It felt anticlimactic the way they brought the Didact back literally 3 days after Halo 4’s ending.

Oh boy, am I gonna rant.

I’d say either Nightfall or Hunters in the Dark. Both failed to properly introduce a new character by making them very bland and share many other similarities. I believe many disliked Nightfall, however I’ve seen quite a number of forum users say they liked Hunters in the Dark, so I’d like to talk more about this one.

Personnally, I found the plot to be terribly predictable, uninteresting and inconsistent with previous canon. The most unnverving aspect of the book though is that it did all of this while preying on our Halo 3 nostalgia by constantly referencing the events we took part in as players on the Ark with the Arbiter and his sidekicks, all while doing absolutely nothing to shed any new light on said events.

This may be somewhat extreme, but I felt genuinely insulted by this book. Not to say all previous Halo novels were masterpieces, but they tried to bring something new to the universe in their own respective ways. They gave us things to reflect on, even when they were action-packed. Even the often bashed ‘The Flood’ tried to show us something new, the Covenant side of things, which we’d never seen before. Hunters in the Dark brought only inconsistencies. It relied way too much on the action to try and make us forget its complete lack of a decent plot and its accumulation of clichés. It felt much more like a very poorly written fanfic than a novel - once again, in my opinion.

I expect much more from Halo novels. Thankfully, most of those that were published in the same time period, such as New Blood and Broken Circle, were very enjoyable. They brought new and fresh ideas, new writing styles, and made me see some aspects of the Halo universe from new angles.

That’s easy. While Nightfall had poor acting, poor effects and only semi-decent plot (second story clips make it much better) my least favourite of all is the animated series of The Fall of Reach. By far. No mention of how the children had perfect genes and that’s why they were selected. So when three kids died in boot camp, it’s okay. Pfft! Seriously? They died in boot camp?! Why even waste time and resources kidnapping them, replacing them with clones and training them at age six if they weren’t able to survive boot camp?! And even the title, “The Fall of Reach”. We never even saw Reach fall in the series! It ended halfway through the story that the novel gave us! It’s like calling the film “Back to the Future” but end it right after Marty McFly ended up in 1955. Not even bother showing him try to return home. The animated series was a joke and a waste of time and money.

Future advice, 343 Industries. If you want to make a film or series about Halo, just make new fiction to expand it, that’s all. And if you want us to revisit a story in another view, either give us the whole story or keep everything the way it was. Because TFoR series didn’t do either!

-Ryan

> 2533274946753626;7:
> I’d say either Nightfall or Hunters in the Dark. Both failed to properly introduce a new character by making them very bland and share many other similarities.

It’s interesting that you named Nightfall due to poor characterization of characters. I much preferred Locke in Nightfall than I did him in Halo 5. Not to say Nightfall is the perfect piece of Halo cinematography (it’s not), but at least in Nightfall it didn’t seem like Locke was trying too hard to be cool.

> 2533274817408735;9:
> > 2533274946753626;7:
> > I’d say either Nightfall or Hunters in the Dark. Both failed to properly introduce a new character by making them very bland and share many other similarities.
>
> It’s interesting that you named Nightfall due to poor characterization of characters. I much preferred Locke in Nightfall than I did him in Halo 5. Not to say Nightfall is the perfect piece of Halo cinematography (it’s not), but at least in Nightfall it didn’t seem like Locke was trying too hard to be cool.

True, he was probably more characterized in Nightfall. But I still felt he had no interesting aspects. To clear that up: he appears as a no-nonsense, brave soldier, and not much more. I feel like the Halo universe has loads of such characters. Locke’s biography says he has doubts about ONI even though he works for them. That’s the kind of stuff I want to hear about, I want 343 to venture into the gray areas. Nightfall was very black and white in my opinion. Locke was simply one of the ‘good guys’, or even the best guy, and that’s all there is to him.

The stories “Lessons Learned” from “Halo: Fractures”

Awful. Simply awful. Nothing about this story is good. Now, I’ve never read Halo: New Blood, so maybe I’m missing something, but the opening is completely disconnected from the main narrative.We also get some really bad expodumps that go on for bloody paragraphs, and it puzzles me as to who these are meant to be for. I mean, this story would make absolutely no sense to anyone who isn’t familiar with the lore, what with the opening scene only comprehensible to those who have read New Blood. Like, any newcomer would expect the story to be about finding out who sent Schien, but he’s never mentioned again after they arrive on Onyx.

I know this is a minor thing, but it incorrectly states that Jun is from Beta company, not Alpha company. Not a big deal, I know, but it doesn’t help the whole vibe of “the author didn’t give a -Yoink-”. Also, the prose is terrible. Take this sentence, for example; “As Tom sailed through the station’s shadow and emerged into the light from the distant sun, he knew he’d made a critical mistake. Jun hadn’t been moving as fast as he’d thought.” Rather than actually show us what’s happening- Tom’s slow realization that he’s made a fatal error, a desperately tense moment where the two try to grab each other a la Gravity, or anything like that- he just blatantly tells us, and it just makes Tom sound like a moron who just threw himself off the ship without even checking if he was going to make it or not.

The second half of the story manages to be both completely unrelated to the first half and even worse! Yes, because the author decides to tackle a controversial subject such as racism. And what does he choose to say about it? Will he note the utter irrationality and danger of prejudice, and how it hurts all involved- even the perpetrators? Will he examine the effect racism can have on the individual? Will he show us how prejudice ultimately comes from a misguided fear, and that, while people can have sympathetic reasons for being racist, that doesn’t excuse it, and that we should try to cure racists of their blindingly stupid ideology rather than simply attacking them? The author does none of these things. Instead he decides to say that racism… is bad!

To which I’d say, “No -Yoink-.” 99% of people above the age of ten know this. And the way the author presents his message comes off as extremely patronising and condescending, turning Tom into the Elite equivalent of a Straw Misogynist simply so he can learn his lesson at the end. The first meeting between Tom and Kasha is probably the only bit of this entire scene that makes any sense; it’s a bit awkward, and Tom is understandably a bit nervous, but he’s quick to realize that Kasha isn’t a threat and actually feels similarly nervous. It’s probably the only bit of the story that isn’t awful.

Then we get some of the worst dialogue I’ve ever seen. Lucy randomly blurts out “I feel like I should be shooting you” which achieves the distinction of being -Yoinking!- awful dialogue and totally out of character. And then Kasha says, “I have already chosen the spot on your neck where my blade belongs.” What? Simply awful dialogue that makes no sense in the given situation. Why would Lucy say this? Why would Kasha say she was just thinking about murdering her?

And then we get the whole “Let’s Tom an absolutely terrible human being to force him through a “character arc”” thing, where Tom is already thinking about killing Kasha already. Then we get another OOC moment from Mendez. He’s a badass Drill Sergeant that doesn’t take -Yoink- from anyone, so you’d expect him to tell all three of them to grow the -Yoink- up and stop behaving like moronic kids. Nope. He awkwardly tells a joke, as if two people under his command didn’t just threaten to murder each other.

Now Tom and Kasha talk to each other for a bit, and they seem to be getting on quite well. This totally contradicts what he thinks later, but there’s no time for that; it’s time to introduce an annoying strawman! Now, I expected a pretty basic story from this guy; his friend/SO/child was killed by an elite, so he hates all elites, and then at the end of the story he realizes he was wrong and redeems himself. Nothing blindingly original, but it’s better that what we got. What we got was “racist”. That’s it. That’s his entire character. And he’s the main antagonist of the entire story. He doesn’t even get a name.

Now, it’s implied later that the guy expected to be rewarded for attacking/ killing Kasha, which is the most nonsensical thing ever. He thought by murdering a security chief he’d be rewarded? Even in the internal logic of the story it makes no sense.

Then we get a pretty awful paragraph. First, we get a random recap of events since our arrival on Onyx, even though the story just showed all of that to us. We also get a moment that makes Tom look utterly unsympathetic: “He had no reason to leap to her defence like this.” Is this guy really debating whether he should just let a sodding hate crime happen when it’s clearly in his power to stop it?

Anyway, to wrap up the story- yes, that was the whole thing. Nothing really happened- Mendez comes back and punishes the soldier’s entire squad, even though they didn’t do anything wrong. This is after the story clearly stated earlier that nobody should be punished for things they didn’t do.

All in all, a simply terrible story that made little sense and relied far too much on unsympathetic strawmen to get its point across. And you know what’s worse? The story would have been a thousand times better- still not good, though- if they had simply made Kasha a brute. That would make the viewers rather weary of Kasha, too, as we’ve never seen a good brute character before. Not to mention it would be interesting to examine Brute culture as opposed to looking at the Elites for the thousandth time. But this story seems allergic to anything that hasn’t been beaten down into the ground a million times before.

Looking at the overall plot structure, it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that the author simply copy/pasted a chunk of the upcoming novel based on Onyx and then added the first half to pad out the length and to include an “exciting” action scene.

“Lessons Learned” is not only the worst Halo story I’ve ever read, it’s also one of the worst published stories I’ve ever laid eyes upon.

> 2533274821734005;8:
> That’s easy. While Nightfall had poor acting, poor effects and only semi-decent plot (second story clips make it much better) my least favourite of all is the animated series of The Fall of Reach. By far. No mention of how the children had perfect genes and that’s why they were selected. So when three kids died in boot camp, it’s okay. Pfft! Seriously? They died in boot camp?! Why even waste time and resources kidnapping them, replacing them with clones and training them at age six if they weren’t able to survive boot camp?! And even the title, “The Fall of Reach”. We never even saw Reach fall in the series! It ended halfway through the story that the novel gave us! It’s like calling the film “Back to the Future” but end it right after Marty McFly ended up in 1955. Not even bother showing him try to return home. The animated series was a joke and a waste of time and money.
>
> Future advice, 343 Industries. If you want to make a film or series about Halo, just make new fiction to expand it, that’s all. And if you want us to revisit a story in another view, either give us the whole story or keep everything the way it was. Because TFoR series didn’t do either!
>
> -Ryan

I agree with some of your points. Nightfall did seem low budget and poor acting. I did like Fall of Reach, but your right it missed a lot of key plot points from the novel.

> 2533274875814858;11:
> The stories “Lessons Learned” from “Halo: Fractures”
>
> Awful. Simply awful. Nothing about this story is good. Now, I’ve never read Halo: New Blood, so maybe I’m missing something, but the opening is completely disconnected from the main narrative.We also get some really bad expodumps that go on for bloody paragraphs, and it puzzles me as to who these are meant to be for. I mean, this story would make absolutely no sense to anyone who isn’t familiar with the lore, what with the opening scene only comprehensible to those who hadn’t read New Blood. Like, any newcomer would expect the story to be about finding out who sent Schien, but he’s never mentioned again after they arrive on Onyx.
>
> I know this is a minor thing, but it incorrectly states that Jun is from Beta company, not Alpha company. Not a big deal, I know, but it doesn’t help the whole vibe of “the author didn’t give a -Yoink-”. Also, the prose is terrible. Take this sentence, for example; “As Tom sailed through the station’s shadow and emerged into the light from the distant sun, he knew he’d made a critical mistake. Jun hadn’t been moving as fast as he’d thought.” Rather than actually show us what’s happening- Tom’s slow realization that he’s made a fatal error, a desperately tense moment where the two try to grab each other a la Gravity, or anything like that- he just blatantly tells us, and it just makes Tom sound like a moron who just threw himself off the ship without even checking if he was going to make it or not.
>
> The second half of the story manages to be both completely unrelated to the first half and even worse! Yes, because the author decides to tackle a controversial subject such as racism. And what does he choose to say about it? Will he note the utter irrationality and danger of prejudice, and how it hurts all involved- even the perpetrators? Will he examine the effect racism can have on the individual? Will he show us how prejudice ultimately comes from a misguided fear, and that, while people can have sympathetic reasons for being racist, that doesn’t excuse it, and that we should try to cure racists of their blindingly stupid ideology rather than simply attacking them? The author does none of these things. Instead he decides to say that racism… is bad!
>
> To which I’d say, “No -Yoink-.” 99% of people above the age of ten know this. And the way the author presents his message comes off as extremely patronising and condescending, turning Tom into the Elite equivalent of a Straw Misogynist simply so he can learn his lesson at the end. The first meeting between Tom and Kasha is probably the only bit of this entire scene that makes any sense; it’s a bit awkward, and Tom is understandably a bit nervous, but he’s quick to realize that Kasha isn’t a threat and actually feels similarly nervous. It’s probably the only bit of the story that isn’t awful.
>
> Then we get some of the worst dialogue I’ve ever seen. Lucy randomly blurts out “I feel like I should be shooting you” which achieves the distinction of being -Yoinking!- awful dialogue and totally out of character. And then Kasha says, “I have already chosen the spot on your neck where my blade belongs.” What? Simply awful dialogue that makes no sense in the given situation. Why would Lucy say this? Why would Kasha say she was just thinking about murdering her?
>
> And then we get the whole “Let’s Tom an absolutely terrible human being to force him through a “character arc”” thing, where Tom is already thinking about killing Kasha already. Then we get another OOC moment from Mendez. He’s a badass Drill Sergeant that doesn’t take -Yoink- from anyone, so you’d expect him to tell all three of them to grow the -Yoink- up and stop behaving like moronic kids. Nope. He awkwardly tells a joke, as if two people under his command didn’t just threaten to murder each other.
>
> Now Tom and Kasha talk to each other for a bit, and they seem to be getting on quite well. This totally contradicts what he thinks later, but there’s no time for that; it’s time to introduce an annoying strawman! Now, I expected a pretty basic story from this guy; his friend/SO/child was killed by an elite, so he hates all elites, and then at the end of the story he realizes he was wrong and redeems himself. Nothing blindingly original, but it’s better that what we got. What we got was “racist”. That’s it. That’s his entire character. And he’s the main antagonist of the entire story. He doesn’t even get a name.
>
> Now, it’s implied later that the guy expected to be rewarded for attacking/ killing Kasha, which is the most nonsensical thing ever. He thought by murdering a security chief he’d be rewarded? Even in the internal logic of the story it makes no sense.
>
> Then we get a pretty awful paragraph. First, we get a random recap of events since our arrival on Onyx, even though the story just showed all of that to us. We also get a moment that makes Tom look utterly unsympathetic: “He had no reason to leap to her defence like this.” Is this guy really debating whether he should just let a sodding hate crime happen when it’s clearly in his power to stop it?
>
> Anyway, to wrap up the story- yes, that was the whole thing. Nothing really happened- Mendez comes back and punishes the soldier’s entire squad, even though they didn’t do anything wrong. This is after the story clearly stated earlier that nobody should be punished for things they didn’t do.
>
> All in all, a simply terrible story that made little sense and relied far too much on unsympathetic strawmen to get its point across. And you know what’s worse? The story would have been a thousand times better- still not good, though- if they had simply made Kasha a brute. That would make the viewers rather weary of Kasha, too, as we’ve never seen a good brute character before. Not to mention it would be interesting to examine Brute culture as opposed to looking at the Elites for the thousandth time. But this story seems allergic to anything that hasn’t been beaten down into the ground a million times before.
>
> Looking at the overall plot structure, it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that the author simply copy/pasted a chunk of the upcoming novel based on Onyx and then added the first half to pad out the length and to include an “exciting” action scene.
>
> “Lessons Learned” is not only the worst Halo story I’ve ever read, it’s also one of the worst published stories I’ve ever laid eyes upon.

Okay that is a nice paragraph. can’t say if I agree with it yet because I have yet to get a copy of Fractures yet but I will be sure to be weary when reading this story when I do get it.

For obvious reasons Halo 5 and the next 72 hours.

No ones complained about Mortal Dictata yet?
Oh boy what a mess THAT was. It feels like it literally could have been its own bloody book instead of the end of at trilogy.
Especially since it literally seemed to be FANFICTION…oh yes the Spartan meets her still living, now-Innie dad and they come to terms with each other instead of, I don’t know, BB, flushing his traitor dorsal sections right out an airlock? (Not that simple of course but thats what I thought when reading it)
Also, for the most part…it offers nothing to the expanding Halo lore. Its a character novel about Naiomi and her dad with some little blurbs about Venezia (which seems to be cropping up in just about damn near every book these days, ex; Last Light) but aside from that…

> 2533274907200114;15:
> No ones complained about Mortal Dictata yet?
> Oh boy what a mess THAT was. It feels like it literally could have been its own bloody book instead of the end of at trilogy.
> Especially since it literally seemed to be FANFICTION…oh yes the Spartan meets her still living, now-Innie dad and they come to terms with each other instead of, I don’t know, BB, flushing his traitor dorsal sections right out an airlock? (Not that simple of course but thats what I thought when reading it)
> Also, for the most part…it offers nothing to the expanding Halo lore. Its a character novel about Naiomi and her dad with some little blurbs about Venezia (which seems to be cropping up in just about damn near every book these days, ex; Last Light) but aside from that…

don’t worry in my Spoiler area was me ranting about how much I hate the Kilo-five trilogy which is in order Grasslands, Thursday war and Moral dicata maybe I should add that to the original post.

I’m not a big fan of maybe 90% of the comics, novels, and films/shorts. There are many character and plot decisions in them that don’t sit well with me as a longtime Halo fan. I’ve only enjoyed the novels that don’t focus much or at all on Humanity and Spartans. Just because the Covenant has more interesting stories to tell. But I will never touch Hunters in the Dark or the Kilo-V trilogy even if they have prominent Sangheilli characters. Yuck.

> 2533274946753626;7:
> Oh boy, am I gonna rant.
>
> I’d say either Nightfall

Yeah I didn’t like Nightfall either.

> 2533274875814858;11:
> The stories “Lessons Learned” from “Halo: Fractures”
>
> Awful. Simply awful. Nothing about this story is good. Now, I’ve never read Halo: New Blood, so maybe I’m missing something, but the opening is completely disconnected from the main narrative.We also get some really bad expodumps that go on for bloody paragraphs, and it puzzles me as to who these are meant to be for. I mean, this story would make absolutely no sense to anyone who isn’t familiar with the lore, what with the opening scene only comprehensible to those who have read New Blood. Like, any newcomer would expect the story to be about finding out who sent Schien, but he’s never mentioned again after they arrive on Onyx.
>
> I know this is a minor thing, but it incorrectly states that Jun is from Beta company, not Alpha company. Not a big deal, I know, but it doesn’t help the whole vibe of “the author didn’t give a -Yoink-”. Also, the prose is terrible. Take this sentence, for example; “As Tom sailed through the station’s shadow and emerged into the light from the distant sun, he knew he’d made a critical mistake. Jun hadn’t been moving as fast as he’d thought.” Rather than actually show us what’s happening- Tom’s slow realization that he’s made a fatal error, a desperately tense moment where the two try to grab each other a la Gravity, or anything like that- he just blatantly tells us, and it just makes Tom sound like a moron who just threw himself off the ship without even checking if he was going to make it or not.
>
> The second half of the story manages to be both completely unrelated to the first half and even worse! Yes, because the author decides to tackle a controversial subject such as racism. And what does he choose to say about it? Will he note the utter irrationality and danger of prejudice, and how it hurts all involved- even the perpetrators? Will he examine the effect racism can have on the individual? Will he show us how prejudice ultimately comes from a misguided fear, and that, while people can have sympathetic reasons for being racist, that doesn’t excuse it, and that we should try to cure racists of their blindingly stupid ideology rather than simply attacking them? The author does none of these things. Instead he decides to say that racism… is bad!
>
> To which I’d say, “No -Yoink-.” 99% of people above the age of ten know this. And the way the author presents his message comes off as extremely patronising and condescending, turning Tom into the Elite equivalent of a Straw Misogynist simply so he can learn his lesson at the end. The first meeting between Tom and Kasha is probably the only bit of this entire scene that makes any sense; it’s a bit awkward, and Tom is understandably a bit nervous, but he’s quick to realize that Kasha isn’t a threat and actually feels similarly nervous. It’s probably the only bit of the story that isn’t awful.
>
> Then we get some of the worst dialogue I’ve ever seen. Lucy randomly blurts out “I feel like I should be shooting you” which achieves the distinction of being -Yoinking!- awful dialogue and totally out of character. And then Kasha says, “I have already chosen the spot on your neck where my blade belongs.” What? Simply awful dialogue that makes no sense in the given situation. Why would Lucy say this? Why would Kasha say she was just thinking about murdering her?
>
> And then we get the whole “Let’s Tom an absolutely terrible human being to force him through a “character arc”” thing, where Tom is already thinking about killing Kasha already. Then we get another OOC moment from Mendez. He’s a badass Drill Sergeant that doesn’t take -Yoink- from anyone, so you’d expect him to tell all three of them to grow the -Yoink- up and stop behaving like moronic kids. Nope. He awkwardly tells a joke, as if two people under his command didn’t just threaten to murder each other.
>
> Now Tom and Kasha talk to each other for a bit, and they seem to be getting on quite well. This totally contradicts what he thinks later, but there’s no time for that; it’s time to introduce an annoying strawman! Now, I expected a pretty basic story from this guy; his friend/SO/child was killed by an elite, so he hates all elites, and then at the end of the story he realizes he was wrong and redeems himself. Nothing blindingly original, but it’s better that what we got. What we got was “racist”. That’s it. That’s his entire character. And he’s the main antagonist of the entire story. He doesn’t even get a name.
>
> Now, it’s implied later that the guy expected to be rewarded for attacking/ killing Kasha, which is the most nonsensical thing ever. He thought by murdering a security chief he’d be rewarded? Even in the internal logic of the story it makes no sense.
>
> Then we get a pretty awful paragraph. First, we get a random recap of events since our arrival on Onyx, even though the story just showed all of that to us. We also get a moment that makes Tom look utterly unsympathetic: “He had no reason to leap to her defence like this.” Is this guy really debating whether he should just let a sodding hate crime happen when it’s clearly in his power to stop it?
>
> Anyway, to wrap up the story- yes, that was the whole thing. Nothing really happened- Mendez comes back and punishes the soldier’s entire squad, even though they didn’t do anything wrong. This is after the story clearly stated earlier that nobody should be punished for things they didn’t do.
>
> All in all, a simply terrible story that made little sense and relied far too much on unsympathetic strawmen to get its point across. And you know what’s worse? The story would have been a thousand times better- still not good, though- if they had simply made Kasha a brute. That would make the viewers rather weary of Kasha, too, as we’ve never seen a good brute character before. Not to mention it would be interesting to examine Brute culture as opposed to looking at the Elites for the thousandth time. But this story seems allergic to anything that hasn’t been beaten down into the ground a million times before.
>
> Looking at the overall plot structure, it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that the author simply copy/pasted a chunk of the upcoming novel based on Onyx and then added the first half to pad out the length and to include an “exciting” action scene.
>
> “Lessons Learned” is not only the worst Halo story I’ve ever read, it’s also one of the worst published stories I’ve ever laid eyes upon.

I thought that It wasn’t bad at all, but I did read New: Blood too, so I was not confused.
The whole story is really just a setup for the new Onyx book coming next year, so that is why it feels unsatisfying.
I actually was entertained throughout all of it, but that’s just my opinion.

> 2533274887950450;17:
> I’m not a big fan of maybe 90% of the comics, novels, and films/shorts. There are many character and plot decisions in them that don’t sit well with me as a longtime Halo fan. I’ve only enjoyed the novels that don’t focus much or at all on Humanity and Spartans. Just because the Covenant has more interesting stories to tell. But I will never touch Hunters in the Dark or the Kilo-V trilogy even if they have prominent Sangheilli characters. Yuck.

I hope you got to read fractures, because it has some amazing stuff(in my opinion).
I wouldn’t say that all the comics are bad, but in my opinion everything that Brian Reed writes for Halo just doesn’t work.
And c’mon, cant you give Humanity some love?