What do you think of my commentary?

I made this a few days ago, and see some problems with it. But I would also like others to see it to let me know of any other things I can do for the next one I am going to make.

Here is the video.

> I made this a few days ago, and see some problems with it. But I would also like others to see it to let me know of any other things I can do for the next one I am going to make.
>
> Here is the video.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn-7l2HOkLY&feature=feedu

It’s good commentary, however you explain two factors:

  1. What makes you qualified to give commentary. MLG Pro commentary is one thing, however I need some convincing before I take pointers from a random person.

  2. Why the quality is so bad, lol.

> > I made this a few days ago, and see some problems with it. But I would also like others to see it to let me know of any other things I can do for the next one I am going to make.
> >
> > Here is the video.
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn-7l2HOkLY&feature=feedu
>
> It’s good commentary, however you explain two factors:
>
> 1. What makes you qualified to give commentary. MLG Pro commentary is one thing, however I need some convincing before I take pointers from a random person.
>
> 2. Why the quality is so bad, lol.

How would I need to be qualified to make a commentary. I don’t need to be, its a free internet.

The quality is so bad, because I am just trying this out. Why spend $250 to find out if I did not like doing this. Maybe when I get the hang of it, and see that people will watch my videos I will spend that money.

> > > I made this a few days ago, and see some problems with it. But I would also like others to see it to let me know of any other things I can do for the next one I am going to make.
> > >
> > > Here is the video.
> > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fn-7l2HOkLY&feature=feedu
> >
> > It’s good commentary, however you explain two factors:
> >
> > 1. What makes you qualified to give commentary. MLG Pro commentary is one thing, however I need some convincing before I take pointers from a random person.
> >
> > 2. Why the quality is so bad, lol.
>
> How would I need to be qualified to make a commentary. I don’t need to be, its a free internet.
>
> The quality is so bad, because I am just trying this out. Why spend $250 to find out if I did not like doing this. Maybe when I get the hang of it, and see that people will watch my videos I will spend that money.

You’re right, it is a free Internet, however what I meant to say was that you should provide information on why people should listen to your pointers. We listen to pros, because they’re pros. Why should we listen to you? I’m not taking a jab at you, I’m just saying that you’d gain a larger audience if you had a catch on why people should listen to you.

Enfinit does have a good point.