> 2533274832863886;1137:
> Here’s a great comment from Youtube that sums it up for me:
>
> “By building an acceleration curve that is aligned to a very specific play style, it assumes EVERYONE plays the game in the exact same way. They don’t. This is the biggest issue with it. You can’t assume everyone plays the same as the pros. It’s an unbelievably flawed assumption. There are people who are slow and calculated. People who like to run gun. People who like to go CQC and melee a lot. People who love snipers and people who hate them. There is no unified way to play this game and attempting to force one style of play on everyone kills variety or - in this case - ends up annoying a lot of people.”
Exactly. I went to sleep last night, not sure what to expect from this post when I woke up. Now I see that a lot of consists of people have NO IDEA WHAT THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT.
Let’s get some facts straight here. Whether or not you feel that the aiming is broken is not the issue. What IS the issue is the fact that a lot of those defending the issue have NO evidence to back up their counter-arguments.
“Dude you just suck git gud”
“People better than you are fine with it so shut up”
“You’re just afraid of change”
None of these are actual, valid points. There is ACTUAL, TANGIBLE proof that the aiming system is flawed, someone has done ACTUAL research into the topic, look at this link: http://xim4.com/community/index.php?topic=42461.0#Telling someone that they suck and need to “git gud” (using long dead memes is NOT a valid argument, contrary to popular belief) just makes you look extremely ignorant.
As the quoted text states, this game was tailored ENTIRELY to the “pro” players and their playstyles, and the fact is, they are a small minority, so everybody most certainly does not play as they do.
Being fine with the aiming as it is, is one thing. That’s okay. What isn’t okay is talking down to someone, saying they just suck and should stop whining when they have very valid, genuine points of critique in regards to the aiming system, and there is actual proof to back up their criticisms.
Stop saying that it’s the low aim-assist that’s making people salty. It isn’t, it never was, and when people have very clearly pointed out that it isn’t the problem, what do you do? Continue to say that it is low aim-assist making them salty.
Learn how to argue, and do some actual research, before typing. Players who have issues with the aiming are not the minority, which, I understand, may be difficult to understand seeing as how you and all 5-6 of your friends have no issues. It’s split pretty evenly.
Ad hominem does not make you objectively right, and wins you an argument. It makes you look like someone who has no clue what they’re even talking about.
halo 3 could make me mad when you hade a br fight and then the rectile decided to follow another enemy