WE should never

> > > > I know this is a guy from call of duty but after reading this i believe we should never treat the creators of halo like this… NEVER no matter what… Even if the game sucked really bad which i highly doubt it ever will… Us fans are what keeps the halo spirit going…
> > > >
> > > > http://www.egmnow.com/articles/news/call-of-duty-fans-act-like-jerks-to-robert-bowling-on-twitter/
> > >
> > > You can expect this to happen if everything stays the same (halo2, halo3) for all future Halo games, as many people want it.
> >
> > I think them doing the same thing over and over is where there making the money…
>
> My point is that the people that want Halo to stay the same, are the people that would bash 343 (or bungie) for not bringing new things to the franchise if it did stay the same.

Oh i see what you mean and yea i fully agree with you

> > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > >
> > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> >
> > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> >
> > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
>
> They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…

But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.

> Apparently you’ve never read Sage’s “fanmail” by some of the more colourful players of Halo.

Haha, I’ve seen both and, trust me when I say this, this time it is like 1000x worse.

> > > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > > >
> > > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> > >
> > > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> > >
> > > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
> >
> > They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…
>
> But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.

microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?

> microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?

Well, it is Microsoft we’re talking about here.

> > > > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> > > >
> > > > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
> > >
> > > They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…
> >
> > But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.
>
> microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?

It was part of the deal. Two more Halo games and they could become independent.

> > > > > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> > > > >
> > > > > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
> > > >
> > > > They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…
> > >
> > > But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.
> >
> > microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?
>
> It was part of the deal. Two more Halo games and they could become independent.

aren’t they owned by activitsion now… sorry for my spelling

> > > > > > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
> > > > >
> > > > > They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…
> > > >
> > > > But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.
> > >
> > > microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?
> >
> > It was part of the deal. Two more Halo games and they could become independent.
>
> aren’t they owned by activitsion now… sorry for my spelling

Sadly yes :frowning:

But that was after Halo:Reach, the 2nd game of their deal with Microsoft.

> > > > > > > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…
> > > > >
> > > > > But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.
> > > >
> > > > microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?
> > >
> > > It was part of the deal. Two more Halo games and they could become independent.
> >
> > aren’t they owned by activitsion now… sorry for my spelling
>
> Sadly yes :frowning:
>
> But that was after Halo:Reach, the 2nd game of their deal with Microsoft.

I could see them being attached to a call of duty game… which would be bad…

Sorry kiddies, this is the real world. You don’t get a gold star for participation and a pink flower for trying your best.

If you do stupid -Yoink-, you deserve to be berated endlessly for it. It’s the only way you’re not going to do the same crap again.

> Sorry kiddies, this is the real world. You don’t get a gold star for participation and a pink flower for trying your best.
>
> If you do stupid Yoink!, you deserve to be berated endlessly for it. It’s the only way you’re not going to do the same crap again.

I’ve taken a few seminars here and that say though your first statement is very true, your second statement would indicate you feel negative reinforcement is more effective than positive.

> Sorry kiddies, this is the real world. You don’t get a gold star for participation and a pink flower for trying your best.
>
> If you do stupid Yoink!, you deserve to be berated endlessly for it. It’s the only way you’re not going to do the same crap again.

when ever i see a post from you… your always hating on something… If your soo keen why don’t you make a good game?

> > > > > > > > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.
> > > > >
> > > > > microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?
> > > >
> > > > It was part of the deal. Two more Halo games and they could become independent.
> > >
> > > aren’t they owned by activitsion now… sorry for my spelling
> >
> > Sadly yes :frowning:
> >
> > But that was after Halo:Reach, the 2nd game of their deal with Microsoft.
>
> I could see them being attached to a call of duty game… which would be bad…

First of all please do not hurt my -Yoink!- ears by saying that.

But yeah that would be bad, however I am 100% sure that will not happen. Have you ever seen the details they showed about their next game? It was a picture with a turbine thingy and an emblem.

> > > > > > > > > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?
> > > > >
> > > > > It was part of the deal. Two more Halo games and they could become independent.
> > > >
> > > > aren’t they owned by activitsion now… sorry for my spelling
> > >
> > > Sadly yes :frowning:
> > >
> > > But that was after Halo:Reach, the 2nd game of their deal with Microsoft.
> >
> > I could see them being attached to a call of duty game… which would be bad…
>
> First of all please do not hurt my -Yoink!- ears by saying that.
>
> But yeah that would be bad, however I am 100% sure that will not happen. Have you ever seen the details they showed about their next game? It was a picture with a turbine thingy and an emblem.

lol sorry… No i have not, can you please send link to me?

> > Sorry kiddies, this is the real world. You don’t get a gold star for participation and a pink flower for trying your best.
> >
> > If you do stupid Yoink!, you deserve to be berated endlessly for it. It’s the only way you’re not going to do the same crap again.
>
> when ever i see a post from you… your always hating on something… If your soo keen why don’t you make a good game?

Oh look, it’s that response again.

I don’t need to know how to code a game to know how to make a good game.

I don’t need to jump off a bridge to know it’s a bad idea.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Well its a good thing 343 listens to there community…
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully fame and success doesn’t get to their head like it did with Bungie.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Yeah. I mean, you got to love Bungie, but they got such a big ego at the end. They said Reach was perfect and refused to fix it even though most of the community disagreed with them. They acted so smug because they were on the top of the world, then it all came crashing down on them. :confused:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Oh well, maybe Bungie will learn from it and 343i won’t make the same mistake.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > They also got lazy with the multiplayer maps in my opinion… They took most of the them right out of the campaign. No maps were fresh or new… 343 made all the fresh maps with the dlc… Yea they did a good job with all the other halos but when they were at there peek… They started to lack… Grenades for example… never fixed…
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But if it wasn’t for Microsoft, Halo3 or perhaps ODSt would have been Bungies last Halo game. Bungie is not all to blame, they were forced to create 2 more Halo games even though they wanted to move on from halo.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > microsoft pushed them to make more games? why though?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It was part of the deal. Two more Halo games and they could become independent.
> > > > >
> > > > > aren’t they owned by activitsion now… sorry for my spelling
> > > >
> > > > Sadly yes :frowning:
> > > >
> > > > But that was after Halo:Reach, the 2nd game of their deal with Microsoft.
> > >
> > > I could see them being attached to a call of duty game… which would be bad…
> >
> > First of all please do not hurt my -Yoink!- ears by saying that.
> >
> > But yeah that would be bad, however I am 100% sure that will not happen. Have you ever seen the details they showed about their next game? It was a picture with a turbine thingy and an emblem.
>
> lol sorry… No i have not, can you please send link to me?

lol

Well here is the link:

http://www.1up.com/news/first-screenshot-bungie-new-game-codenamed-tiger

Yep play nice, these people work really hard to make these games and we just complain
and troll and not be thankful.

Even if the game does suck they still worked really hard at it.
You cant make a game that everyone likes.

Plus if you dont like a game, go play something you do like or pick up a programming book
and make a game!

> Yep play nice, these people work really hard to make these games and we just complain
> and troll and not be thankful.

LOL.

Last time I checked we didn’t get games for free , we owe them nothing.

There are some people like that around here, too :frowning:

Wow and I thought the trolls on here were bad O.o