> 2533274836913281;23:
> > 2533274907200114;22:
> > > 2533275008181400;21:
> > > > 2535429593088083;2:
> > > > So basically Warzone without the A.I. enemies and bosses? A match would take forever, and would be harder for the losing team.
> > >
> > > Hmmmm, I wonder how much REQ points and XP I’ll get if I finish a full game of Warzone Slayer…
> >
> > More than a game of BTB but less than an actual Warzone game most likely. How would they make it so that people actually fought each other though…maybe you still have to capture a point.
>
> The fact of meeting a certain threshold would be enough to pit people against each other.
That wouldn’t stop people from just finding one place and camping. Part of the reason there’s bosses in Warzone is so that people actually go out and DO something other than just hold the middle point and an armory.
I think this idea would work best in WZA since you have limited time to capture each base and have limited to destroy the core. Thats why i dont play regular wz at all most of the so called “top players” just spam the hell out vehicles and think they are better than all. In wza they also spam vehicles, not all the time, but since most fights are close to mid range its easier to take them down.
Nope, the game becomes a race to see which team levels up the fastest to get the vehicles and power weapons first, then the winning team is decided within the first 5-10 minutes
Warzone does count a point for every enemy Spartan you kill so you just need 1000 kills to win. Theoriically this is imossible with the basses and bosses but it’s just a way to make things faster and easier. If you want a game that takes over an hour than be my guest but the servers will get so full and all the games will just get loads of lag.
> 2533274836913281;25:
> > 2533274816299345;5:
> > > 2535440693312185;3:
> > > Gotta agree with Haxor. And unfortunately no more content for Halo 5.
> >
> > Thats not content. Its a playlist.
> >
> > I do agree that what op is asking for is a bad idea though lol
>
> But why a flat out “bad idea”?
“Warzone Slayer” wouldn’t bring anything new to the table at all, honestly to the point of redundancy. You’re better off in a BTB Slayer match if you want your fill.
I wouldn’t mind the bosses taken out but flood it with low level Ai like grunts and crawlers turn it into a real -Yoink- show that would be fun for a double xp weekend
The I my bad thing about Warzone is that people will spend their reqs to deal a ton of damage to a boss only to have some guy come along and snag the credit for the kill.
> 2533274836913281;41:
> Now, if the bosses had two health bars (one for blue and one for red) THEN it would be even. To see who gets the most damage in for the kill.
I like this. I want to like it twice! This just makes sense. Seriously.
> 2533274903727694;8:
> > 2533274950766071;7:
> > > 2533274903727694;6:
> > > Man, 1000 kills to get? A lot of people are going to get like 200+ kills, if not more!
> >
> > Who said it has to be like 1000 kills to win? Right, no one.
> > I like the idea.
>
> Then it wouldn’t be warzone.
Right, it’s warzone slayer. The win condition would be different from typical warzone, just like warzone Assualt and warzone firefight have different win conditions.
If you MUST have your 1000 score limit, they could just change how many points are awarded for kills.
Sounds like a bad idea because the first thing that would happen is a bunch of 12 man teams would coordinate and curb stomp randoms so then 343 would limit the fireteam size to yet another WZ playlist so all of the bigger teams would go back to BTB. And in an attempt to make it up to the big teams 343 would come out with a special weekend playlist just for 12 man teams, but only have it one weekend every 3 months.
Yes, I’m still very bitter about how they’ve handled WZ since the fireteam limit. The same thing would happen in this playlist too so I’m voting no on the idea just so it doesn’t suffer the same fate.