Lets face it Warzone is a highly COMPETITVE game mode & when partied up can be very strategizing… There should be platnuim diamond onyx & champion BUT with the acceptio that if you lose it doesn’t affect your ranked. It goes by kills & objective ONLY this will determine how good of a Warzone player are you. Not according to loses . What do you guys think ?
Ranked or no, Warzone matchmaking should be looked at. Seems like 9/10 matches are landslide wins where one team is clearly a large party and the other is a bunch of randoms. I know I’m not alone in this.
As long as the theoretical ranking system is fair,it should help a lot. But, what it really needs is smarter matchmaking. Put the large groups against other large groups and fill the gaps with solo players, if it’s going to put a bunch of randoms on a team, the other team should also be a bunch of randoms.
I’m personally tired of getting thrown in with a bunch of solos with no mics against large parties. Losing 10+ times in a row by 400+ points is no fun. I don’t care how good a player you are.
You really want to throw a wrench, add a Warzone list that can only be accessible in parties of one. It doesn’t hurt those elitists who like to counter only with, “sucks to be you, I have a super team”. You can still party up and play against other like minded parties.
> 2635141924834914;2:
> Ranked or no, Warzone matchmaking should be looked at. Seems like 9/10 matches are landslide wins where one team is clearly a large party and the other is a bunch of randoms. I know I’m not alone in this.
>
> As long as the theoretical ranking system is fair,it should help a lot. But, what it really needs is smarter matchmaking. Put the large groups against other large groups and fill the gaps with solo players, if it’s going to put a bunch of randoms on a team, the other team should also be a bunch of randoms.
>
> I’m personally tired of getting thrown in with a bunch of solos with no mics against large parties. Losing 10+ times in a row by 400+ points is no fun. I don’t care how good a player you are.
>
> You really want to throw a wrench, add a Warzone list that can only be accessible in parties of one. It doesn’t hurt those elitists who like to counter only with, “sucks to be you, I have a super team”. You can still party up and play against other like minded parties.
Highly agree on this also
It would certainly entice some people to buy more REQ packs…
The randoms going up against 12 man teams is starting to get real old.
This is something that would happen in all the halo’s if you qued up for a big team game solo, but the difference here? It seems that the only people left playing warzone are:
Randoms, and 12 man pub stomping teams. It’s just happening almost constantly now.
> 2604313713106098;5:
> The randoms going up against 12 man teams is starting to get real old.
>
> This is something that would happen in all the halo’s if you qued up for a big team game solo, but the difference here? It seems that the only people left playing warzone are:
>
> Randoms, and 12 man pub stomping teams. It’s just happening almost constantly now.
I’ve noticed this also. It seems like right after Christmas it went from somewhat equal games to getting thrashed by large organized clans. A ranking system would be nice.