Warzone Boss Theory

Games Halo 5: Guardians
1

The warzone boss system. Some people love it. Some people hate it. I for one, fall more on the positive side of things.
We can all agree for one thing. Warzone would still be great without the bosses. So why are they in the game?
Well, it’s simple: Warzone is not ranked.
What does rank have to do with the boss system? Well, imagine the pros up against newer and less experienced players. The score would probably be like
(And I’m being generous to the noobs)
1000-300 at the end of a match.
But let’s say noobs go look for bosses.
If the pros have ANY heart in them, they’d get at least a few bosses.
So the score would look more like
1000-400 at the end of a match.
I think that if Warzone was ranked, bosses would not be implemented because the matches would be more balanced in score.

So in short:
Warzone bosses are implemented so less skilled players have a better chance of winning.

2

Ideally, there would be equal amounts of pros and noobs in both teams and Warzone matches would end 1000-900. But since farming for commendations have became a thing, we have well coordinated and communicative teams playing with strategy facing teams of randoms. Both teams have pros and noobs.

Anyway, I call BS in your theory because Warzone Assault has no bosses and yet it’s still unranked.

3

> 2533274938827434;2:
> Ideally, there would be equal amounts of pros and noobs in both teams and Warzone matches would end 1000-900. But since farming for commendations have became a thing, we have well coordinated and communicative teams playing with strategy facing teams of randoms. Both teams have pros and noobs.
>
> Anyway, I call BS in your theory because Warzone Assault has no bosses and yet it’s still unranked.

Mmkay. I was talking about normal warzone. Not WZA.