Do I win?
P.s: I know this is getting locked.
I agree with all except Reach, I liked it, but it wasn’t as enjoyable as Halo 3.
Oh, and I agree around… say… 45% with Halo 4 like Halo 3. If it was BASED off halo 3, then… okay. But to all-out copy and paste everything onto a shiny new disk labelled Halo 4… NOPE.
If you change #1 into:
Halo 4 should be anything but Reach
And replace #4 with:
Halo 4 should not be a copy of previous Halos
then yes sir, you win.
Because that’s what every discussion is about these days.
> If you change #1 into:
>
> Halo 4 should be anything but Reach
>
> And replace #4 with:
>
> Halo 4 should not be a copy of previous Halos
>
> then yes sir, you win.
> Because that’s what every discussion is about these days.
I think there are more threads telling that people need to be patient then the ones telling Halo 4 should not be a copy of previous Halos. But I agree with your advice about #1
Yeah, you seem to have gotten it right. You missed one things though, being that Halo 4 must be exactly like Halo 2. Those threads seem to be more popular as of late.
> > If you change #1 into:
> >
> > Halo 4 should be anything but Reach
> >
> > And replace #4 with:
> >
> > Halo 4 should not be a copy of previous Halos
> >
> > then yes sir, you win.
> > Because that’s what every discussion is about these days.
>
> I think there are more threads telling that people need to be patient then the ones telling Halo 4 should not be a copy of previous Halos. But I agree with your advice about #1
Ah, sorry I meant #5 with that one haha.
> Do I win?
no you go less then 10%
> If you change #1 into:
>
> Halo 4 should be anything but Reach
>
> And replace #4 with:
>
> Halo 4 should not be a copy of previous Halos
>
> then yes sir, you win.
> Because that’s what every discussion is about these days.
Probably more like 95%
Well that’s pretty accurate. You forgot the threads about “No armor lock in Halo 4” and “Bring back 1-50 ranking system.”
Yeah, those seem pretty accurate.
I have been unable to keep up with all the thread topics, but from my experience, your pretty close to the top ones popping up. Not all of them though.
You could have just posted derp derp derpiddy derp derp and I would have agreed with you.
I hate to sound like I’m telling mods how to do their jobs, but all of these stupid duplicate threads about forge and matchmaking BS and complaining about what Halo 4 isn’t should be merged into the other threads that existed prior. It’s obnoxious coming in here every day and finding 3 new pages of new threads hat are just more IDEA ABOUT FORGE!
I mean seriously. There’s almost 400 pages of topics and the game was just announced like 6 months ago. How much discussion can there possibly be based on a couple minutes of trailer that isn’t even in game footage? Whatever.
> 1. Halo 4 must be anything but Reach.
> 2. Halo 4 must be exactly like Halo 3.
> 3. 343i needs to release new info NAO!
> 4. People must be patient.
> 5. We need gamebreaking mechanics in Halo 4
> 6. I know 343’s job better then they do.
>
> Do I win?
>
> P.s: I know this is getting locked.
You forgot these:
> > 1. Halo 4 must be anything but Reach.
> > 2. Halo 4 must be exactly like Halo 3.
> > 3. 343i needs to release new info NAO!
> > 4. People must be patient.
> > 5. We need gamebreaking mechanics in Halo 4
> > 6. I know 343’s job better then they do.
> >
> > Do I win?
> >
> > P.s: I know this is getting locked.
>
> You forgot these:
>
> 1. 1-50
> 2. Bla Bla COD Bla Bla
I wanted to use the least possible number of sentences. But I agree. 