Credit goes to Vetoed.Some good changes from Vetoed here,if you dont know who Vetoed is,he is a high level halo 5 player that streams mostly halo and destiny on twitch with clips uploaded to youtube sometimes.Check out his google doc on his suggested changes,alot of it is stuff that we may love/dont like.Uny responded to his list saying thanks on twitter but we have to see when that appreciated thanks turns to something actual hopefully,thoughts? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s5JKWQnRY4CGmFg6eJfP1nFZqLgez1-9G5T8SsK7LA0/edit
Individual armor pieces customization sounds great I hope 343 takes that into consideration. Also I don’t think anyone notices but when someone joins in a full fireteam, someone from that fireteam gets kicked out and needs to be fixed. How about it Ske7ch?
> 2533274871396650;2:
> Individual armor pieces customization sounds great I hope 343 takes that into consideration. Also I don’t think anyone notices but when someone joins in a full fireteam, someone from that fireteam gets kicked out and needs to be fixed. How about it ske7ch?
It does although they couldn’t have 200 or so armor pieces then because there would be to many shoulder or knee pieces to scroll through. They could have like 40 armors or so and then it would be great
I dont like the part where diamonds should be facing champs just because the player population is low,its a sign of bad matchmaking if you get wrecked by someone better than you(if they are champ n you are unranked) just because the game cant match someone of equal skill.Bronze should be facing bronze-silver,gold facing gold-low plat etc
> 2533274871425050;4:
> I dont like the part where diamonds should be facing champs just because the player population is low,its a sign of bad matchmaking if you get wrecked by someone better than you(if they are champ n you are unranked) just because the game cant match someone of equal skill.Bronze should be facing bronze-silver,gold facing gold-low plat etc
If the game did that, then it should match the overall skill equally so you would basically have one champion player on each team along with the diamonds.
I agree with the points that he made.
> 2727626560040591;5:
> > 2533274871425050;4:
> > I dont like the part where diamonds should be facing champs just because the player population is low,its a sign of bad matchmaking if you get wrecked by someone better than you(if they are champ n you are unranked) just because the game cant match someone of equal skill.Bronze should be facing bronze-silver,gold facing gold-low plat etc
>
> If the game did that, then it should match the overall skill equally so you would basically have one champion player on each team along with the diamonds.
>
> I agree with the points that he made.
That would make sense, but I did just run into something oddly similar yesterday.
Played team slayer, got trounced (it’s the game on Riptide in my history). Other team had an Onyx, Platinum 1, Diamond 4, Diamond 2.
My team had unranked (me), Diamond 2, Diamond 1, Platinum 6. I think I ended up being a Platinum 5 or something.
That matchup makes literally no sense. Especially when you look at the game before it when I played against the same exact team, but upgrade my teammates to Diamond 4 and Diamond 2, and downgrade my other to Gold 2.
Like seriously, what the hell. There’s no situation where a gold player should be playing against an Onyx player, and even if that other team is all teamed up, there’s no reason a solo player like myself should be grouped with them two games in a row, when I only ended up being a higher rank than one of those four.
> 2533274850493408;6:
> Played team slayer, got trounced (it’s the game on Riptide in my history). Other team had an Onyx, Platinum 1, Diamond 4, Diamond 2.
>
> My team had unranked (me), Diamond 2, Diamond 1, Platinum 6. I think I ended up being a Platinum 5 or something.
>
> That matchup makes literally no sense. Especially when you look at the game before it when I played against the same exact team, but upgrade my teammates to Diamond 4 and Diamond 2, and downgrade my other to Gold 2.
>
> Like seriously, what the hell. There’s no situation where a gold player should be playing against an Onyx player, and even if that other team is all teamed up, there’s no reason a solo player like myself should be grouped with them two games in a row, when I only ended up being a higher rank than one of those four.
They were a full party and the platinum 1 player screwed up the matching which allowed you to get crappier teammates. The visible ranking doesn’t really mean much though because the game uses CSR to match people. The low diamonds in the second game might be more skilled than the diamond 4 in the first game. Either way, the game probably didn’t match the onyx player evenly and being a full party only helped them as well.
> 2727626560040591;7:
> > 2533274850493408;6:
> > Played team slayer, got trounced (it’s the game on Riptide in my history). Other team had an Onyx, Platinum 1, Diamond 4, Diamond 2.
> >
> > My team had unranked (me), Diamond 2, Diamond 1, Platinum 6. I think I ended up being a Platinum 5 or something.
> >
> > That matchup makes literally no sense. Especially when you look at the game before it when I played against the same exact team, but upgrade my teammates to Diamond 4 and Diamond 2, and downgrade my other to Gold 2.
> >
> > Like seriously, what the hell. There’s no situation where a gold player should be playing against an Onyx player, and even if that other team is all teamed up, there’s no reason a solo player like myself should be grouped with them two games in a row, when I only ended up being a higher rank than one of those four.
>
> They were a full party and the platinum 1 player screwed up the matching which allowed you to get crappier teammates. The visible ranking doesn’t really mean much though because the game uses CSR to match people. The low diamonds in the second game might be more skilled than the diamond 4 in the first game. Either way, the game probably didn’t match the onyx player evenly and being a full party only helped them as well.
Exactly.
I fail to understand how the game will fail to match someone evenly, and that when playing team games, it doesn’t take into account if you’re a full team or not. Maybe the population really is that low, evidenced by me playing the same team two games in a row. But on a late Sunday afternoon, I think it’d be higher (damn you game for not having a player counter). I mean obviously serves me right for being a solo player, but come on now. I think we can do better.
HOLY. -Yoink-…i agree with EVERYTHING and cant think of anything else, if ALL these were implemented into h5 it WOULD be the best halo ever, maybe It wont be added, but please 343, please, at LEAST consider all these options for h6 and I will be AMAZING
> 2533274871425050;4:
> I dont like the part where diamonds should be facing champs just because the player population is low,its a sign of bad matchmaking if you get wrecked by someone better than you(if they are champ n you are unranked) just because the game cant match someone of equal skill.Bronze should be facing bronze-silver,gold facing gold-low plat etc
no, its saying that IF you have a team of 3 onyx/champs and 1 diamond so as to match diamonds and steam roll them, they should match other onyx/champs instead of matching diamonds (at least, that’s how i read it)