Veto system = more fun

Games Halo: The Master Chief Collection
41

I don’t have very strong opinions on this anymore, as I’ve pretty much retired from PvP. But my past experience goes as follows:

Because people will veto for BR’s and Slayer, the veto system makes the game more repetitive. I do dislike many maps (Narrows and Construct are included in that list, maps many people like.), but I don’t think vetoing is the answer. And map voting is even worse.

343 should could be on the ball when it comes to maps people don’t like. Editing spawns and even forging maps to alter the parts people don’t like. But that would be an ideal (unrealistic) world where more people would leave more constructive feedback, more often.

All I know for sure, is that I didn’t like how repetitive the games got under the veto and voting systems.

1 Like
42

veto/vote system was fine, and even without veto/vote system people still quit, and who cares if the same popular maps gets played over again, vanish Valhalla from 4v4 and other big maps from 4s cause it’s a waste of time especially when people quit, and if some maps vanishes cause of the voting system then so be it, a good majority of player didn’t care, removing the voting system on mcc was one of the dumbest thing ever pre game lobbies and party up system that also would be great if they came back

1 Like
43
44

Please do not revive old threads. But welcome to the community all the same!