Does anyone know if thet Ranking systemk will or could be updated?
Most likely no.
> Most likely no.
do you want a new ranking system?
> > Most likely no.
>
> do you want a new ranking system?
Most likely no.
> > Most likely no.
>
> do you want a new ranking system?
I’d take anything over cR.
> > > Most likely no.
> >
> > do you want a new ranking system?
>
> I’d take anything over cR.
I’m with you on that.
The Arena ranking system has more than twice as many ranks and is much more accurate than 1-50 was. They just need to move more playliists over Arena to make the Arena/Competitive offering more balanced like we had in Halo 3 with Ranked/Social.
please add a 1-50! OBV no1 likes arena, look at the players…
> The Arena ranking system has more than twice as many ranks and is much more accurate than 1-50 was. They just need to move more playliists over Arena to make the Arena/Competitive offering more balanced like we had in Halo 3 with Ranked/Social.
Also showing your Rank in other playlists would help to populate Arena , IMO.
> > The Arena ranking system has more than twice as many ranks and is much more accurate than 1-50 was. They just need to move more playliists over Arena to make the Arena/Competitive offering more balanced like we had in Halo 3 with Ranked/Social.
>
> Also showing your Rank in other playlists would help to populate Arena , IMO.
Agreed. There’s 2 separate ranking systems in Reach - there’s no reason for one rank to be displayed prominently across all playlists and the other to be buried under multiple menus.
the 1-50 system could be way more accurate than arena if it would also regard the player’s rating etc. like arena does at the moment. e.g. all 47s could get rated in % so 47s of similar skill could be matched up against each other. so this system would contain 50 divisions! it would also show how long it will take u to get ranked up or down. I’d say if ure like top 95% of 48s u cant get to 47 by not playing (like it is the case at arena) except u lose. moreover if ure playing good but ur team doesnt the rating can protect u from ranking down cause of teammates failure. this ranking system would work pretty good in my opinion!
> the 1-50 system could be way more accurate than arena if it would also regard the player’s rating etc. like arena does at the moment. e.g. all 47s could get rated in % so 47s of similar skill could be matched up against each other. so this system would contain 50 divisions! it would also show how long it will take u to get ranked up or down. I’d say if ure like top 95% of 48s u cant get to 47 by not playing (like it is the case at arena) except u lose. moreover if ure playing good but ur team doesnt the rating can protect u from ranking down cause of teammates failure. this ranking system would work pretty good in my opinion!
That’s a great idea
That system + a global (always displayed) would be sweet
> The Arena ranking system has more than twice as many ranks and is much more accurate than 1-50 was. They just need to move more playliists over Arena to make the Arena/Competitive offering more balanced like we had in Halo 3 with Ranked/Social.
A greater number of overall ranks doesnt make it better.
Examples
“Wow, I just won 10 games in a row I wonder what my rank is?” - Better go to bed and check the next morning
"I’d like to see what my rank is…? - Dig through 7 menus to get there
“Wow that was a good game, I would like to see how my rank compares to those other players.” - Proceed again to dig through way to many menus!!!
Also showing your Rank in other playlists would help to populate Arena , IMO.
I agree…
> > The Arena ranking system has more than twice as many ranks and is much more accurate than 1-50 was. They just need to move more playliists over Arena to make the Arena/Competitive offering more balanced like we had in Halo 3 with Ranked/Social.
>
> A greater number of overall ranks doesnt make it better.
>
> Examples
>
> “Wow, I just won 10 games in a row I wonder what my rank is?” - Better go to bed and check the next morning
>
> "I’d like to see what my rank is…? - Dig through 7 menus to get there
>
> “Wow that was a good game, I would like to see how my rank compares to those other players.” - Proceed again to dig through way to many menus!!!
Actually yes it does. In terms of accuracy, the more the better. I mean if 1-50 was turned into 1-10 it wouldn’t tell you as much. Because a 10 could be as high as a 50 or low as 45 when compared to 1-50.
> the 1-50 system could be way more accurate than arena if it would also regard the player’s rating etc. like arena does at the moment. e.g. all 47s could get rated in % so 47s of similar skill could be matched up against each other. so this system would contain 50 divisions! it would also show how long it will take u to get ranked up or down. I’d say if ure like top 95% of 48s u cant get to 47 by not playing (like it is the case at arena) except u lose. moreover if ure playing good but ur team doesnt the rating can protect u from ranking down cause of teammates failure. this ranking system would work pretty good in my opinion!
The monthly deranking system in Reach is actually a pretty great idea. While it should slowly derank players over time, rather than immediatly, it does its job well. First of all, players can’t simply jump up to the #1 spot- then never play again to keep it there. It also eliminates boosters, as buying accounts is now useless.
> The Arena ranking system has more than twice as many ranks and is much more accurate than 1-50 was. They just need to move more playliists over Arena to make the Arena/Competitive offering more balanced like we had in Halo 3 with Ranked/Social.
Maybe after the TU gametypes will actually be much more competitively balanced for hyper competitive play once again. This meaning FFA Arena can come back, Double’s Arena and maybe even an Objective Arena playlist. This only if there is no new rainking implemented. If the “List” is the list, then the growth of population in the community will actually make Arena playlists play the way they should. After time, traits of the TU can touch Arena to help perfect it.
I just can’t wait for the long overdue playlist update honestly.
If it does i would like my waypoint rank (all the achievements for halo games rank) and a 1 - 100 ranking system for skill where everyone starts at 50 and goes up or down from there. It could keep track of people’s lowest skill and highest skill
[deleted]
> First of all, players can’t simply jump up to the #1 spot- then never play again to keep it there.
Technically they can.
The system only deranks you if someone else places higher than you.
Out of a hundred player if top five highest skilled players (Onyx is top 5%) in the playlist are 44, 45, 46, 47 and 48 and a new guy comes in and places 50 then he’ll never derank. Nobody else can place higher than him to push him out.
It’s also why Arena needs to have monthly resets. Because once four more people out of that 100 hit 50 then nobody else can become Onyx unless new players are added to the system.
I placed Top 20% Gold last season and only deranked to Top 30% Gold.