To those defending 343

How can you not expect a backlash when you say “There will be a progression and perks system in Halo 4.” ?

The reason I prefer the Halo franchises over CoD is because of it’s simplicity and the cold hard fact that if someone is better then me, they kill me. If I’m better then someone else I kill them. Yes I understand they haven’t explained it yet, but now certain players will have an upperhand over other players because they’ve played for longer. Not to mention the fact this probably means no 1-50 ranking system.

I know we’re essentially blindly flipping out, but what are we supposed to do? 343 is basically making Halo Reach: Modern Warfare 4. They’re making it seem like just because the BR is in the game that makes all of this okay…

I REALLY HOPE 343 implements this correctly because the franchise can’t take another Reach.

Yeah if there is another Reach then Halo will die.

Edited by a moderator. Please refrain from attacking other members.

Original post. Click at your own discretion.

Please go outside and jump off the heightest building near you! well, If you can get your fat -Yoink- out of your bed.

This game is nothing like cod or Bf3 or any other game its halo! Halo had the weapons on their back before everyone else so is all other games copying halo? NO.

THEY ARE MAKING IT BETTER! BETTTTTER! -Yoinking!- FAT -Yoink-

Let’s see how they work before posting threads like this.

Halo is tought. We can survive another Reach. But a 3rd one would be fatal.

However, I don’t think we will have to survive a 2nd one at all. Halo 4 looks awesome.

I have the same reservations you do; but I think it’s hardly fair to freak out when there’s simply no footage or details of said implementation as of yet. The best we can do is wait, and engage when the time comes, rather than making fifty butthurt threads about the same damn thing.

From everything I’ve heard and seen 343 has no idea what the core experience is for Halo.

Only thing they seem to be getting right is the character development of Chief and the campaign.

> Yeah if there is another Reach then Halo will die.

They took bleedthrough back out because Halo Reach was designed around NOT having it. Adding it in messed with the way the game played.

> Let’s see how they work before posting threads like this.

I agree 117%

What makes you think it will be new weapons or perks that actually give an advantage? What part of “changes the gameplay” means “makes the user OP” in your fantasy world?

>

I’m actually not in bed right now, I don’t usually sleep past 7AM, sorry to disappoint.

While I don’t know what there doing, at the same token, I’m not sure you can tell me there making the game better, as the only gameplay mechanics we know about are shields, and the battle rifle.

> What makes you think it will be new weapons or perks that actually give an advantage? What part of “changes the gameplay” means “makes the user OP” in your fantasy world?

Well if the perks don’t give an advantage what would they do exactly…?

Edited by a moderator. Please refrain from flaming other members.

Original post. Click at your own discretion.

Can you go jump off a bridge?..

Patience young Skywalker.

>

I’d prefer not to. Why don’t we stay on topic shall we?

The reason I play Halo is because it’s a level playing field. Everyone starts off with the same thing. And the first team to 50 wins.

Well, Reach ruined this with AA’s. H4 looks awesome, but I do hope there’s no “perk” type settings… =(

My only deffence for them is this thing they said:

> Both O’Connor and creative director Josh Holmes acknowledged that the change could prove controversial amongst Halo’s community. “I expect a variety of different reactions,” Holmes told Eurogamer, “One of the great things about Halo is we have the ability to support a variety of different play styles and play lists, create experiences that cater to different player types and community desires.”

This might mean, no weapon pointers, no random power weapon spawns, no perks in Ranked playlists.

This gives a feel of confort.

>

Can you please give us a reason why the OP should jump of a bridge?

>

Oh great, the keyboard warrior tool strikes again. Why are you calling everyone fat? what an idiot.