This isn't Bungie

What on earth makes you think this is going to be Halo Reach 2? since Bungie left, 343 has been putting dozens of times more attention to Reach in a few months than Bungie has in a year, completely changed the formula and turned it into a smoother game.

There is Sprint yes, but that doesn’t mean there’s going to be AAs, there is also no bloom, we don’t even know how this “perk” system will work, the few seconds of the new maps we saw are already better than most Reach maps.

So don’t just go all negative on every single new Halo game becuase of Reach, this isn’t Bungie, this is 343i, they are not going to make they’re new game in ANY WAY like Reach. it may not play exactly like the original trilogy, but face it, 343 wants to innovate and i greatly respect them for that, unlike other companies who keep rehashing there games just cause it sells, and i sure as hell wouldn’t want the whole reclaimer trilogy to be Halo 3 remade 3 times.

/rant

It’s possible there will be AA’s since we saw the thruster symbol, but it could be a thing only implemented in playlists like action sack or something.

> …This isn’t Bungie, this is 343I…

You know that 343I is made predominately of old Bungie employees, right?

> What on earth makes you think this is going to be Halo Reach 2? since Bungie left, 343 has been putting dozens of times more attention to Reach in a few months than Bungie has in a year, completely changed the formula and turned it into a smoother game.
>
> There is Sprint yes, but that doesn’t mean there’s going to be AAs, there is also no bloom, we don’t even know how this “perk” system will work, the few seconds of the new maps we saw are already better than most Reach maps.
>
> So don’t just go all negative on every single new Halo game becuase of Reach, this isn’t Bungie, this is 343i, they are not going to make they’re new game in ANY WAY like Reach. it may not play exactly like the original trilogy, but face it, 343 wants to innovate and i greatly respect them for that, unlike other companies who keep rehashing there games just cause it sells, and i sure as hell wouldn’t want the whole reclaimer trilogy to be Halo 3 remade 3 times.
>
> /rant

How do you know they’re not going to make a game like Reach? And you’re right this isn’t Bungie. This is Microsoft, so we should be very afraid of what’s to come.

> > …This isn’t Bungie, this is 343I…
>
> You know that 343I is made predominately of old Bungie employees, right?

There isn’t even a dozen of them, Frankie stated it several times. And Achronos did, too.

> What on earth makes you think this is going to be Halo Reach 2? since Bungie left, 343 has been putting dozens of times more attention to Reach in a few months than Bungie has in a year, completely changed the formula and turned it into a smoother game.
>
> There is Sprint yes, but that doesn’t mean there’s going to be AAs, there is also no bloom, we don’t even know how this “perk” system will work, the few seconds of the new maps we saw are already better than most Reach maps.
>
> So don’t just go all negative on every single new Halo game becuase of Reach, this isn’t Bungie, this is 343i, they are not going to make they’re new game in ANY WAY like Reach. it may not play exactly like the original trilogy, but face it, 343 wants to innovate and i greatly respect them for that, unlike other companies who keep rehashing there games just cause it sells, and i sure as hell wouldn’t want the whole reclaimer trilogy to be Halo 3 remade 3 times.
>
> /rant

There’s your problem.

> > What on earth makes you think this is going to be Halo Reach 2? since Bungie left, 343 has been putting dozens of times more attention to Reach in a few months than Bungie has in a year, completely changed the formula and turned it into a smoother game.
> >
> > There is Sprint yes, but that doesn’t mean there’s going to be AAs, there is also no bloom, we don’t even know how this “perk” system will work, the few seconds of the new maps we saw are already better than most Reach maps.
> >
> > So don’t just go all negative on every single new Halo game becuase of Reach, this isn’t Bungie, this is 343i, they are not going to make they’re new game in ANY WAY like Reach. it may not play exactly like the original trilogy, but face it, 343 wants to innovate and i greatly respect them for that, unlike other companies who keep rehashing there games just cause it sells, and i sure as hell wouldn’t want the whole reclaimer trilogy to be Halo 3 remade 3 times.
> >
> > /rant
>
> There’s your problem.

ding ding ding, we have a winner.

> > …This isn’t Bungie, this is 343I…
>
> You know that 343I is made predominately of old Bungie employees, right?

Yeah, 2 out of 200 employees are from Bungie.

Why do I expect a Reach 2 in some form?
Lets see: Sprint, Perks, Costum loadouts, Random weapon timers.

If these things are implemented then not only is it a Reach 2, it will probably be worse then Reach.

I don’t care what anyone says. I’m looking forward to Halo 4.
I will be the judge of how I like it when it comes out. Until that day comes I will reserve my judgement. At least until we get some solid evidence of what will be in the game, not just some speculation.

Why would I be mad at Bungie? They gave me CE. The one I am hating is Microsoft.

343i isn’t Bungie? MFW

> Why do I expect a Reach 2 in some form?
> Lets see: Sprint, Perks, Costum loadouts, Random weapon timers.
>
> If these things are implemented then not only is it a Reach 2, it will probably be worse then Reach.

So, almost every game out today is a Reach 2, even those that came out before it? It is innovating, modernizing, it is keeping up with today’s games.

The sprint, perks system, and any other additions could be completely different than what we all think. We should wait and see how exactly they work before we declare them “ripping off CoD” or “Reach 2”.

> Why do I expect a Reach 2 in some form?
> Lets see: Sprint, Perks, Costum loadouts, Random weapon timers.
>
> If these things are implemented then not only is it a Reach 2, it will probably be worse then Reach.

The overextrapolation is strong with this one.

Reach wasnt bad. It’s still halo

I liked Reach, so if Halo 4 is like a Reach 2 Saul Goodman.

> > …This isn’t Bungie, this is 343I…
>
> You know that 343I is made predominately of old Bungie employees, right?

There’s only 3 employees from Bungie at 343 Industries; Frankie, Vic and Chad, that’s it.

- Jason Garwood

> > …This isn’t Bungie, this is 343I…
>
> You know that 343I is made predominately of old Bungie employees, right?

You know that only a select few members of Bungie left for 343i, right?

> What on earth makes you think this is going to be Halo Reach 2? since Bungie left, 343 has been putting dozens of times more attention to Reach in a few months than Bungie has in a year, completely changed the formula and turned it into a smoother game.

There’s no possible way you truly believe this…

Bungie put a crazy amount of work in on Halo: Reach. They made hundreds of major to subtle changes to all the playlists and the gameplay.

I’m all for wanting 343i’s to succeed, but don’t go and insult Bungie because you didn’t like Halo: Reach.

> this isn’t Bungie, this is 343i

You don’t say?