why couldn’t use the successful setting used in reach to create an even better halo add-on from halo 3 which was also incredible to play?i know that 343 wanted to create something new.But honestly they’ve just created a pile of -Yoink- and they no it aswell as the halo community… halo should be more like reach!!!
No. Reach is when Halo started to decline. The introduction of Armour Abilities and loadouts deviated from the balance and fairness that is true Halo gameplay.
Highly debateable. It’s a great opinion though.
Also, what the heck is up with your username?
I think that Halo Reach has best multiplayer, Simply loadouts, armor abilities.
Campaign:
#1 - Reach
#2 - Halo 2
#3 - Combat Evolved
#4 - Halo 3
#5 - Call of… I mean Halo 4
Multiplayer:
#1 - Halo 3
#2 - Halo 2
#3 - Reach
#4 - Combat Evolved
#5 - Call of… again? Meant Halo 4
Agree, Reach was when Halo was at its best.
Yeah there are AA’s in reach but mlg v7 settings are great.
Halo 3 had it right with the maps and including vehicles in smaller maps, but movement speed was way too slow and the BR with its spread was a horribly inconsistent weapon in my hands.
Reach is my favorite when it comes to Matchmaking. I love the inclusion of AA’s, I like the DMR (even with its bloom problems), and I like the grenades that act like mini-nukes. The only thing it suffers from is a sub-par selection of maps, and Active Camo as an AA.