> If you love Halo 3 so much, why not go play it? New games in a franchise should be different, they should evolve and change.
Bungie was very good at innovating and adding new features that complemented the gameplay, not detracted from it, in a way that the majority of fans would like. If you look at Halo 4’s multiplayer, you can see that everything it is was either already put in place by Bungie in previous Halos or taken almost directly from Call of Duty. I really don’t see much innovation in Halo 4’s multiplayer, and the additions and changes they made detracted from the strategic, teamwork-encouraging gameplay we’ve grown fond of.
> I don’t know if most of you even remember when Halo 2 or 3 came out, but Bungie’s forums were filled with people complaining about dual wielding (in 2) and equipment (in 3) and how Bungie had ruined Halo by changing too much; it was the cool thing to do. Now, it is apparently cool to complain (ad nauseum, beyond any point of potential constructiveness) about Halo 4; it’s an ongoing cycle of butthurt that occurs in the fandom of every franchise and it will never end, period.
Some people will complain about the changes in any new game in any franchise. The large majority usually switch to the new game though. Halo 4 is a different case in that more fans left than stayed.
> > What I would like to know is why 343 hired people who hated Halo.
>
> That’s a pull-quote built off of a poor choice of words and meant to grab attention. The full quote (which, incidentally, answers your question):
>
>
>
> > We had people who we hired who hated Halo because of “X,” but what that really meant was, “I feel like this game could be awesome because of ‘Y input’ that I’m going to bring into it. I want to prove it, and I’m passionate about proving it.” So we ended up with a bunch of people who were genuinely passionate about the product. That is a huge advantage, and that helped in hiring and forming our team.
>
> They didn’t hire people who hated Halo; they hired people who hated certain things about Halo, for the reasons Frankie stated.
Here’s hoping that 343i realizes that Halo didn’t need to change in order to compete with other games. It merely needed to build up what it already had. (Offering constructive insight, not flaming)
Previous Halo titles held their own and maintained population. This is fact. Speculation arises when questioning why Reach and H4 did relatively poorly. Im my opinion, the reason stems from what people liked in Halo before these. They liked the BR, they liked Master Chief, but a character and a weapon don’t make the gameplay itself something great. Halo was simplistic, with everyone spawning at equal footing, allowing better players to succeed due to skill. With everyone having the same core abilities, equipment and therefore map control became of paramount importance. Today, Halo is (comparatively) complicated, unnecessarily so, with loadouts mimicking more mainstreak FPS games, personal gameplay modifiers that changed how people would play, sometimes for the worse. “Resupply” has been a standard and innate ability in earlier games, but now is portrayed as one such modifier. Being able to choose what weapons to spawn with brought with it consequences concerning how people would play, how easily players could stop vehicles, etc. These additions may sound cool, some would say “innovative” even though its in many other games, but the point is that it wasn’t how Halo was expected to play. Map control has lost its emphasis, power weapons can be called down to your location, and you can spawn with the ability to become invisible. I’m not saying AAs are a bad addition, just feel that it would be better (in my opinion) to place them on the maps along with weapons and watch as their usage would come to mean something more.
Halo Community and CoD Community are Opposites, We want Halo to stay the same forever, And when it changes we hate it (Still Love Halo and Halo 4, Just waiting for Champions DLC) And the CoD Community Want Change because they Don’t Like Having CoD The same all the time.
During my 'Break’from Halo 4, I grabbed my copy of Halo 3 and had the most fun I have ever had while playing on my Xbox, Halo 3 IS a Great Game And if 343 Made halo 5 a Halo 3 ‘Remake’ I, And I’m sure everyone else would be exceptionally Happy!
> Halo Community and CoD Community are Opposites, We want Halo to stay the same forever, And when it changes we hate it (Still Love Halo and Halo 4, Just waiting for Champions DLC) And the CoD Community Want Change because they Don’t Like Having CoD The same all the time.
>
> During my 'Break’from Halo 4, I grabbed my copy of Halo 3 and had the most fun I have ever had while playing on my Xbox, Halo 3 IS a Great Game And if 343 Made halo 5 a Halo 3 ‘Remake’ I, And I’m sure everyone else would be exceptionally Happy!
Exactly, Halo and CoD have both had loyal fanbases. CoD knows what kind of game it is and doesn’t usually deviate from that. Halo has, in recent years, tried to diversify itself and wound up alienating much of its fanbase. The numbers don’t lie: This month, Blops 2 has been #1, with H4 being #8…
Halo needs to return to its roots and grow from there, rather than try to replant itself a bit closer to the mainstream, where the CoD live, if you know what I mean. Sorry for the word play, but it had to be done
Halo 4 had amazing visuals and audio. I also enjoyed the campaign (for the most part). A challenging boss fight for an ender would have been more appropriate.
That being said, this games biggest downfall was the removal of visible ranks (1-50). I’m not going to bother explaining why, you understand their importance if you’re a true fan.
There were a lot of other poor gameplay mechanics they tried to implement. Bottom line is Halo doesn’t need to borrow gimmicks from generic shooters.
Halo 4 was a watered down noob friendly attempt at winning over the COD crowd.
I have high hopes for Halo 5. Unless they’re absolutely clueless, I strongly believe they will get it right this time around… But then again, I said that about Halo 4 after Halo Reach and it’s pathetic “arena” playlist.
> > Does 343i really deserve all the hate they have been getting literally nonstop since this game’s release?
> >
> > I see people on here every single day pointing out everything they think is bad about this game and then saying “It’s obvious that 343i has no idea what they are doing and they just want to destroy Halo” What? This game definitely has its flaws don’t get me wrong, but it seems quite clear to me that they do care about Halo. They made a great new story, the soundtrack to this game is arguably one of the best (imo) and they put much more emotional weight into the characters.
> >
> > Even after their mistakes they continue to patch the game so that people will enjoy playing it.
> >
> > There are long time Halo fans here that say they are completely done with Halo forever because of this game. That’s your choice and no one is going to change that but why don’t you think about it for just a second. You are going to leave the series that you love and adore just because the first game made by 343i wasn’t as succesful as the other ones? For all the faults that this game has I think that it’s still a great game. Great campaign, multiplayer is fun.
> >
> > I can’t stand when people just jump on the hate wagon because they don’t know what’s actually wrong with the game. “Cortana died! 343i is killing Halo!!!111” “No original Halo theme? This game has forgotten what Halo is all about!”
> >
> > Like seriously, the bashing of 343i has gone way too far. If you find an issue with the game then point it out without looking like an offensive idiot and maybe provide an idea for an alternative or a fix if you can.
> >
> > I’m not a crazy fanboy mindlessly defending 343i, I’m trying to show you how mindless and negative these forums really are for the most part.
> >
> > You all condemned Halo after one mistake! I believe that 343i can be entrusted with this series and they can and already have been learning from their mistakes.
> >
> > Thanks for reading.
>
> I haven’t checked the forums in quite a bit and found your post.
>
> Before I stopped playing Halo 4, which I haven’t touched in months now, I was one of the players left dissatisfied with Halo 4. I ranted, discussed and dissected what I and others felt was wrong with the newest installation in the series. EVERYTHING others and I disliked about the new game was written about time and time again.
>
> Threads discussing the problems in Halo 4 were all over the forum, the best of which garnered 120+ pages of agreements and discussion.
>
> The people who disliked Halo 4 who cared enough to make the arguments over and over got tired of making those arguments. The game wasn’t changed. Then those that were dissatisfied quit playing and moved on. Like myself, they just stopped playing.
>
> I probably won’t play Halo 4 multiplayer again. I tried to enjoy it, but the longer I played it the less enjoyable I felt it was. I think I was forcing myself to like it because it was new. That phase is now over.
>
> The real sign of how badly Halo 4 has sunk my view of the franchise is that when Halo 5 comes out I will probably try to find someone who has the game already and play it before I buy it. If it is like Halo 4, I won’t buy it. Before Halo 4 the question wasn’t IF I would buy it, the question was how many hours before midnight was I showing up to buy the next Halo game.
>
> I do not like the changes made by 343 to Halo. If you do, that is perfectly fine.
>
> <mark>Not everyone who dislikes Halo 4 has a burning hatred of 343</mark>. 343 owns the property now, they can make changes as they see fit. I’m just not going to buy their product.
> I see people on here every single day pointing out everything they think is bad about this game and then saying “It’s obvious that 343i has no idea what they are doing and they just want to destroy Halo” What?
I don’t think that Halo 4 is dying, but it’s certainly not doing well. I think that the fact that 343i continues to maintain it – despite the apparently low probability of its population ever increasing by a significant margin and then remaining increased – is a testament to their dedication to, and care for, the franchise.
> > I see people on here every single day pointing out everything they think is bad about this game and then saying “It’s obvious that 343i has no idea what they are doing and they just want to destroy Halo” What?
>
> I think it’s a variant of hindsight bias.
>
> <mark>I don’t think that Halo 4 is dying, but it’s certainly not doing well. I think that the fact that 343i continues to maintain it – despite the apparently low probability of its population ever increasing by a significant margin and then remaining increased – is a testament to their dedication to, and care for, the franchise.</mark>
>
>
> They have no choice
This.
I very much agree with both statements. If they really didn’t care about Halo 4, they’d just drop it entirely and not bother trying to update it - the Champions DLC included.
> > I see people on here every single day pointing out everything they think is bad about this game and then saying “It’s obvious that 343i has no idea what they are doing and they just want to destroy Halo” What?
>
> I think it’s a variant of hindsight bias.
>
> I don’t think that Halo 4 is dying, but it’s certainly not doing well. I think that the fact that 343i continues to maintain it – despite the apparently low probability of its population ever increasing by a significant margin and then remaining increased – is a testament to their dedication to, and care for, the franchise.
>
>
> They have no choice
They deserve that and more for ruining halo and this, “We are taking halo back to its roots” That was like an spit in the the face for the old halo fans.
> @iKreutz, to answer your question about the multiplayer, Halo 2 pre-patch would like a word with you…
Uh, I would still take Halo 2 pre-patch over Halo 4 anyday. I never had more fun with an online multiplayer than that game. It was pure addiction. Besides, I am really not sure what you’re trying to say.
This post has been edited by a moderator. Please do not post spam.
*Original post. Click at your own discretion.
> They deserve that and more for ruining halo and this, “We are taking halo back to its roots” That was like an spit in the the face for the old halo fans.
PEOPLE LIKE YOU NEED TO BECOME PART OF THE SOLUTION, NOT THE PROBLEM.
> > @iKreutz, to answer your question about the multiplayer, Halo 2 pre-patch would like a word with you…
>
> Uh, I would still take Halo 2 pre-patch over Halo 4 anyday. I never had more fun with an online multiplayer than that game. It was pure addiction. Besides, I am really not sure what you’re trying to say.
You must not of ever played pre-patch halo 2, think how broken pre-tuning halo 4 was and times it by 800
> > > @iKreutz, to answer your question about the multiplayer, Halo 2 pre-patch would like a word with you…
> >
> > Uh, I would still take Halo 2 pre-patch over Halo 4 anyday. I never had more fun with an online multiplayer than that game. It was pure addiction. Besides, I am really not sure what you’re trying to say.
>
> You must not of ever played pre-patch halo 2, think how broken pre-tuning halo 4 was and times it by 800
I played Halo 2 pre-patch and it makes Halo 4 look like a Wii title.
Halo 4 multiplayer is utter garbage compared to Halo 2.
The fact that a game released in 2004 had more features than a title released nearly a decade later is an embarrassment.
> > > > @iKreutz, to answer your question about the multiplayer, Halo 2 pre-patch would like a word with you…
> > >
> > > Uh, I would still take Halo 2 pre-patch over Halo 4 anyday. I never had more fun with an online multiplayer than that game. It was pure addiction. Besides, I am really not sure what you’re trying to say.
> >
> > You must not of ever played pre-patch halo 2, think how broken pre-tuning halo 4 was and times it by 800
>
> I played Halo 2 pre-patch and it makes Halo 4 look like a Wii title.
>
> Halo 4 multiplayer is utter garbage compared to Halo 2.
>
> <mark>The fact that a game released in 2004 had more features than a title released nearly a decade later is an embarrassment.</mark>
When Halo 2 launched, it was missing more than half of it’s content… Halo 4 was fully completed at launch, but a great many things were unbalanced due to the lack of a beta. Halo 2 also had an extreme amount of aim-assist/Bullet-Magnetism.
Either way, it’s invalid to use Halo 2 as a comparison in any argument featuring Multiplayer.
> > > > @iKreutz, to answer your question about the multiplayer, Halo 2 pre-patch would like a word with you…
> > >
> > > Uh, I would still take Halo 2 pre-patch over Halo 4 anyday. I never had more fun with an online multiplayer than that game. It was pure addiction. Besides, I am really not sure what you’re trying to say.
> >
> > You must not of ever played pre-patch halo 2, think how broken pre-tuning halo 4 was and times it by 800
>
> I played Halo 2 pre-patch and it makes Halo 4 look like a Wii title.
>
> Halo 4 multiplayer is utter garbage compared to Halo 2.
>
> The fact that a game released in 2004 had more features than a title released nearly a decade later is an embarrassment.
If you really call this crap better you must either have a bad memory or are blinded by nostalgia
And if you hate Halo 4 so much, why do you have 7 days playtime?
> > > > > @iKreutz, to answer your question about the multiplayer, Halo 2 pre-patch would like a word with you…
> > > >
> > > > Uh, I would still take Halo 2 pre-patch over Halo 4 anyday. I never had more fun with an online multiplayer than that game. It was pure addiction. Besides, I am really not sure what you’re trying to say.
> > >
> > > You must not of ever played pre-patch halo 2, think how broken pre-tuning halo 4 was and times it by 800
> >
> > I played Halo 2 pre-patch and it makes Halo 4 look like a Wii title.
> >
> > Halo 4 multiplayer is utter garbage compared to Halo 2.
> >
> > The fact that a game released in 2004 had more features than a title released nearly a decade later is an embarrassment.
>
> If you really call this crap better you must either have a bad memory or are blinded by nostalgia
>
> <mark>And if you hate Halo 4 so much, why do you have 7 days playtime?</mark>
> > > > > @iKreutz, to answer your question about the multiplayer, Halo 2 pre-patch would like a word with you…
> > > >
> > > > Uh, I would still take Halo 2 pre-patch over Halo 4 anyday. I never had more fun with an online multiplayer than that game. It was pure addiction. Besides, I am really not sure what you’re trying to say.
> > >
> > > You must not of ever played pre-patch halo 2, think how broken pre-tuning halo 4 was and times it by 800
> >
> > I played Halo 2 pre-patch and it makes Halo 4 look like a Wii title.
> >
> > Halo 4 multiplayer is utter garbage compared to Halo 2.
> >
> > The fact that a game released in 2004 had more features than a title released nearly a decade later is an embarrassment.
>
> If you really call this crap better you must either have a bad memory or are blinded by nostalgia
>
> And if you hate Halo 4 so much, why do you have 7 days playtime?
That may be crap to you but that doesn’t mean its crap to others. Every Halo game has its problems, exploits, glitches, etc.
It’s a side of the community which turns on when a new game releases. We play this every time when a new title arrives. It’s somehow now lasts long (2012 Nov. - 2013 Jul.) but probably because Halo 4 was the first step of 343 and 343 like a nephew now. It’s easy to attack them, because they’re doing their first steps, and everyone knows about it. Halo 4 should get constructive criticism, I think we should support the baby’s first steps, rather then try to trip up.
Bungie were, Bungie gone.
Original Trilogy were, Original Trilogy gone.
I mean, Halo is at a critical time now. It’s try to (it’s have to) innovate. A new company with new ideas (343) is ideal for that role. But like every adolescent, they lack experience, but they weren’t fear to ask for helping hands… but we threw flames at them rather than help.
People would not complain so much if the game had held up to its high standards, but 343i lust for change just for the sake of change was a horrible aproch like I said in another post the gimmicks they added to the game should not have been their foundation to make a new game on, they should have just been gimmicks
