they just fell off the map!
We don’t know 100% what Frankie meant, but time will tell, there could be fall damage, there might not be, although we can’t go basing that Fall Damage is in off the bulletin.
> We don’t know 100% what Frankie meant, but time will tell, there could be fall damage, there might not be, although we can’t go basing that Fall Damage is in off the bulletin.
It does seem ridiculous how people can come to such certain conclusions based off of such little evidence…
> > We don’t know 100% what Frankie meant, but time will tell, there could be fall damage, there might not be, although we can’t go basing that Fall Damage is in off the bulletin.
>
> It does seem ridiculous how people can come to such certain conclusions based off of such little evidence…
It makes me laugh, they say the whole game will suck based off less than a minute of gameplay and how fall damage is in when Frankie was talking about something else completely.
Sometimes people need to stop, read it carefully and not look to deep into it.
I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
> I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
Not really, only in Campaign, multiplayer in Halo 3 wasn’t canon, while Halo 4’s will be, I hope Spartan IVs tech has finally found a solution to the fall damage.
I honestly wish I knew where people come up with these idea’s and their pretty lame ones at that. Obviously we wont have fall damage if were still running around in Mark 6-7 Mjolnir, considering a fall from atmosphere heights nearly couldnt just crack Johns suit like a egg. I seriously doubt there will be any jumps to that height in multiplayer -.-… and I’d love to see some possible invasion maps or themes with a ODST drop in style through forge without pancaking my character. It just seems like people will grab and snatch up anything for some ammo, even the developers themselves seem incapable of writing a simple bulletin without some conspiracy rising amongst bashers.
Either way I believe fall damage will be sitting this one out, unless all canon is bout to break loose lol.
> I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
I agree. There is no confirmation of no fall damage.
> I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
Depends on the maps they have made. Spire wouldn’t work as well with fall damage, especially in Invasion. Most maps would be fine without it and it would only affect people who use Jetpeck in a ridiculous way.
> Sometimes people need to stop, read it carefully and not look to deep into it.
Story of this forum.
> I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
Agreed. Fall damage belongs in Halo. If you jump off the high-ground because you can’t stand the beating you’re getting, you deserve to be punished for it.
> > > We don’t know 100% what Frankie meant, but time will tell, there could be fall damage, there might not be, although we can’t go basing that Fall Damage is in off the bulletin.
> >
> > It does seem ridiculous how people can come to such certain conclusions based off of such little evidence…
>
> It makes me laugh, they say the whole game will suck based off less than a minute of gameplay and how fall damage is in when Frankie was talking about something else completely.
>
> Sometimes people need to stop, read it carefully and not look to deep into it.
No, we say the game will suck based off countless inclusions of things that we already know haven’t worked, as well as unnecessary additions that seem to do nothing for fairness, competition, and gameplay in general.
I liked it when there was no fall damage. So I hope it comes back, but I’m okay with or without it. I just prefer it not be there.
Dude how can you make such a big thing about one sentence. It’s not like they said “no fall damage will be present in Halo 4”. Just take a breather
You have just as little information as the people you are arguing against…
> I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
So Master Chief falling from space and surviving wasn’t silly?
> > I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
>
> So Master Chief falling from space and surviving wasn’t silly?
Actually, it was silly. I think that’s what he’s saying.
It’s how I feel at least.
Besides, even MC was a little rough for wear after that one.
This topic is pointless since you have no evidence to support your theory.
> > I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
>
> So Master Chief falling from space and surviving wasn’t silly?
The Mk.VII has a shield system capable of allowing atmospheric entry from exo-space and even to reduce free-fall speeds so that fall damage can be “eliminated.”
The Chief in his Mk.VI didn’t free-fall down to Earth in Halo3, he rode the dreadnaught’s bulkhead like a leaf in the wind and had to use the safety lockdown systems of the suit to survive the impact.
2 completely different scenarios.
> > I hope there is fall damage, it was silly without IMO
>
> So Master Chief falling from space and surviving wasn’t silly?
Playing devil’s advocate:
Noble 6 survived a drop from atmosphere as well, yet Halo Reach has fall damage.
That being said, if given an option, I’d like to have the option to choose between the 2, and if fall damage, how much…but in that case, yeah, default no fall damage.