> 2535409489305717;9678:
> > 2535456165221911;9677:
> > > 2533274867266391;9673:
> > > > 2533274832130936;9672:
> > > > > 2533274819567236;9669:
> > > > > > 2535411548517898;9655:
> > > > > > > 2533274819567236;9653:
> > > > > > > > 2535411548517898;9647:
> > > > > > > > > 2533275035781111;9632:
> > > > > > > > > > 2535411548517898;9624:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2533274801176260;9609:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2535411548517898;9606:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274801176260;9597:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535411548517898;9573:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > so then you prefer a pay to win Halo without sprint, you really care more about sprint than that Halo is almost becoming a pay to win???
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I want both, sprint and Reqs/MTs, removed from future iterations.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But if somebody were to put a gun to my head and forced me to choose between the two of them, I’d rather have sprint gone and Reqs/MTs stay than the other way around.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Reqs/MTs don’t affect me in campaign. Sprint does.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > how does sprint affects in campaign??? is not like someone is forcing you to use it or anything.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sprint affects level design, enemy AI and weapon balance. All of them are relevant in campaign. You can’t avoid them just by not spriting.
> > > > > > > > > > > Levels need to be more wide and stretched, so sprinting players don’t get stuck on objects. That makes a lot of campaign levels dull, being either a long corridor or a vast and empty plane. AI needs to be programmed with a player’s peak performance in mind, so they usually are just as fast as sprint speed, while still being able to shoot. It also doesn’t help that 343 introduced teleporting enemies who can bum-rush you at a moments notice. Meanwhile, when on the offense, you have to decide whether to approach enemies at a slower speed while shooting, missing shots and losing ammo because of the distance (which the infinite-ammo-wielding enemies don’t have to worry about) or sprint towards them so you get into range before growing a beard, while constantly getting bombarded by their barrage fire. All this while suffering from the reduced average TTK that was implemented because of sprint.
> > > > > > > > > > > I actually don’t really care what happens in multiplayer. 343 could reduce the multiplayer to one weapon, one map, have blue team stand on the ceiling and moonwalking be the only method of moving. But campaign is the last place I want to see sprint in.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > not at all, Reach for me was one of the games with better level design in camaign and it also has the ability to sprint if you want to, also it had one of the best AI in my opinión, what really affects level design is the -Yoinking!- lack of creativity fron 343i, just look at the infinite armor variants in Halo 5, also that they’re changing the level, AI design and almost everything else to atract new players from other games, which is a -Yoinking!- terrible idea, they focus on other fans than in keeping the fans they already had, which makes Halo turning into another generic random fps, Reach is a prove that a game can have sprint, and still feel like Halo in everything else. The problema isn’t sprint, the problema is that 343i doesn’t know how to implement anything the right way in the game.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal. Just because you believe something or something is true in your experience does not mean that you can use that to disprove someone else. Unless you can provide evidence that can be agreed on and proven true then you can’t try and disprove other people with your opinion.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > then do you have evidence that people stop playing just for sprint or that dislike the whole game just for that, I know sprint made some changes to the franchise, but is not the -Yoinking!- end of the games, is just sprint, anyone can tolerate it, and if who doesn’t at least tolerate it is just because is bad at playing with the new mechanics and because can’t get use to it so tries to change the whole game at his convenience.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, I haven’t posted in this thread for about a week, so maybe I missed it, but have you told us why you think sprint is beneficial to the gameplay? If so, just link me to the post(s).
> > > > > > > Otherwise your posts seem to be talking about other problems the franchise has. Concerned about playable Elites? Check out that thread. Concerned about split screen? Check out that thread. We’re discussing sprints place in the game in this thread.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I’m not saying sprint is benefical, but is is neither bad, is something that doesn’t even have anything to complain about.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > There’s actually a number of reasons why it’s bad. Each of those words is a different link addressing different parts of the discussion (though there is some overlap, each contains something new) and that’s just some of the ones I found after looking back 400 pages.
> > > > >
> > > > > Whether it’s polls from when the community was larger or the opinions of those that have since left the franchise, there’s reason to believe people aren’t happy with it and there’s nothing to suggest sprint is helping the popularity of the game or peoples opinions of it in any way whatsoever.
> > > > >
> > > > > If sprint is neither good nor bad, then time and resources shouldn’t be wasted on it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I’ve given up eh
> > > > for every single post laid out detailing point by point why sprint is bad and then breaking down that point into fine tiny details
> > > > the response we get as to why sprint is “good for halo”
> > > > is:
> > > > “I like sprint”
> > > > “A super solider should be able to sprint”
> > > > “immersion”
> > > > “so you can move faster”
> > > >
> > > > To date I don’t believe I’ve seen an actual
> > > > mechanic gameplay based argument for the inclusion of sprint
> > >
> > >
> > > They drive you insane dont they? I’ve given up trying to argue with these guys its like communicating with a brick wall most of the time. I’m in the same boat as you, I’ve never seen any valid explanation as to why sprint should stay throughout the 4 years its been with halo. It’s sad really
> >
> >
> > Same here…
>
>
> They drive people crazy. This is what happens when something not belonging to Halo comes.
One day, I certainly questioned to myself. “Why am I debating with these people who state there is no reason needed for liking something?” especially when those people demand “reasons” from us that show them why we don’t like something other wise they call us “blind hater.” Yet, those people are saying they don’t need reasons to like something and defend it without telling us reason. The hilarious thing is they are expecting us to be convinced with their thoughtless statement and groundless supportive reason or evidence for their claim. I am amazed by this community’s skill and still being amazed by something every day.