> 2533274811492694;6099:
> > 2533274795123910;6082:
> > > 2533274811492694;6078:
> > > I just want to say one this. Gameplay back then in the older games was limited to what you could do because of hardware limitations. Now we have allot more options in what we can do. You guys are telling me, when they can plug you into the computer like the matrix, you’re gonna still want to walk at the same speed at all times? If you said yes to that then I guess you guys are also the type that enjoys Minecraft for hours on end.
> > >
> > > Gameplay will change as hardware changes. They are parallel with each other. If you wanted the same halo as back in the day then that’s what you guys should ask for. Maybe they should support halo 2 and just keep coming out with DLC’s to add on to the game for you guys that can’t stop complaining about what the company is doing. “I don’t like sprint” “I don’t like armor abilities” “I don’t like the new weapon skins” “I don’t like anything that’s new or remotely innovative”.
> > >
> > > The thing is 343 isn’t making the game just for you. They have to sell this game to the new generations as well. Adding new features is a method of doing that. As soon as sprint is removed, I guarantee there would be allot more of an uproar.
> >
> >
> > Okay then, what kind of technological marvel has been developed in the last two decades that enable the mechanics we see today?
>
>
> Umm, what? You seemed to have missed the point. The thing is you highlighted it yourself. “GAMEPLAY” doesn’t isolate it to mechanics. Gameplay is everything, physics, mechanics, graphics, movements, animations and more. That’s everything.
>
> But highlight two sentences out of a post and make that your argument when there’s a whole point to be made. That’s called selective reading.
Ah I’m sorry, here I was thinking we were talking about gameplay mechanics ala sprint, clamber and other player controlled features / mechanics in a thread about a player mechanic. You know, that sort of gameplay. Really my bad…
Okay, let’s look at the Italics then.
First paragraph, that’s an assumption meant being somewhat of an insult. For the record, I like playing Minecraft.
Second paragraph, that’s a “go back to old Halos” worded differently when it has been established time and again that many dislike the direction, not change overall.
“But then you’d complain that what you got wasn’t how you wanted it”.
Well if I order a hardboiled egg and get it scrambled of course I’m going to complain, because it wasn’t how I wanted it.
“You’ll just complain to complain either way because you got an egg”
You know me sooo well…
I don’t see how an insultory assumption and a poor generalisation and with a poor solution is of any relevancy to the point that was being made, hardware. So I chose to leave it out, so yes, selective reading. Unless of course the point was an attempt at being insulting, generalising and providing a poor solution, in which case I apologise for picking out the unrelated “hardware” talk.
Then there’s the third paragraph. Well this does sum up the AAA market at the moment.
Attract an audience with interesting game mechanics rather than interest the audience with attractive gameplay.
Perhaps there’d be an uproar, perhaps not, probably depends on what’s the trend at that point because i343 has shown to be quite adept at following trends.