> 2535440283237581;5381:
> > 2533274911186826;5380:
> > > 2535440283237581;5304:
> > > > 2533274911186826;5300:
> > > > > 2535440283237581;5298:
> > > > > > 2533274911186826;5294:
> > > > > > > 2535440283237581;5293:
> > > > > > > > 2533274911186826;5289:
> > > > > > > > > 2533275035781111;5288:
> > > > > > > > > > 2533274911186826;5286:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2533275035781111;5275:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274911186826;5269:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533275035781111;5258:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274911186826;5257:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274831961512;5210:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274911186826;5202:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274831961512;5171:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274911186826;5163:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535440283237581;4987:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274911186826;4984:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2535440283237581;4981:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274911186826;4980:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Keep sprint. Slightly alter it however.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First off, why keep it?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, how would you slightly alter it?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It shouldn’t be removed. It’s an evolution that has already been made.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps decrease speed. Increase time it takes to reach full speed. Or make it an armor ability. Anything to your liking so your problem can be solved.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let’s avoid terms that describe changes as improvements and instead outline what the changes do, shall we? So what are the effects that adding Sprint to Halo has brought?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anything to my liking so that my issues with Sprint would be resolved? Alright, let’s tweak it so that players can still fire weapons/throw grenades/melee while doing so and make it where players can sprint in any direction, rather than just forward. That’ll pretty much do it for me.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I like your idea, but I think that should just be an armor ability. For instance, let’s change Dexterity. When equipped, you may fire your weapons, throw grenades (Which increases the throwing distances) and melee while sprinting.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am pretty sure we learned from Halo 4 that perks and AAs in competitive play was a very very bad idea.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn’t learn.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The very lack of them inside arena and breakout and the modes still being praised and nobody talking about them or asking for them back should show nobody really misses them or wants them back too badly.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alas, that is only a mere assumption. When you get poles to prove that, only then I think 343 will think about removing it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It’s a educated and fact based assumption as he is right and we haven’t seen anyone ask for there return
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Very little people want it removed. You are included in this small minority. Firstly, your post is contradictory. How can an assumption be fact based without proof? The actual definition of the word assumption is, “A thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.”
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Second, Sprint is different in Halo 5 than it is in Halo 4,and not just because of the shelf recharge delay. In Halo 4, they simply added a limited sprint mechanic on with no thoughts to balancing. This made maps have to be bigger, but it didn’t add anything to the game, since engaging an enemy still behaved generally the same way as it did in previous Halos, except now people could escape more easily.
> > > > > > > > > > > > However, in Halo 5 they decided to make it part of a whole set of new movement abilities, so that it didn’t feel tacked on like it did in Halo 4. I enjoyed Halo 4 when it released, and I enjoyed the Halo 5 beta, but after playing Btb yesterday and going from Halo 3 Valhalla to Halo 4 Ragnarock, the addition of sprint just felt clunky, and nothing like how it is in Halo 5, which is why I think halo 5 needs to keep sprint, because otherwise the other movement abilities, while useful, won’t be as effective as they can be when used with sprint. So long as the maps are designed with all the movement abilities in mind, sprint shouldn’t be an issue. Halo 5 needs sprint, Halo 4 didn’t.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > And that’s why I think you and everyone who disagrees with this post, is wrong.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > So your assumption is greater than my assumption? great argument buddy
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > That’s hypocritical. If i’m trying to prove my point, that makes it an invalid argument? I’m not saying “Hey i’m right, what you say doesn’t matter.”
> > > > > > > > > > And that is not an assumption. That’s a subjective post.
> > > > > > > > > > So yes, what a great argument “bud.”
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You claimed that I’m in the minority with no proof right after telling me that I was just making assumptions, that sound pretty hypocritical to me
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Once again, it’s a subjective post. I’ll explain to your level, meaning it’s what “I think.”
> > > > > > > > If you pay a little more attention you can find this quote “I think” Straight out of context.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Against your claim, which you think is right no matter what.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Very little people want it removed. You are included in this small minority.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I don’t see any “I think” or “in my opinion” here…
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You are looking at the wrong post.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You made an assumption in the post I quoted, didn’t acknowledge it as such or give any sources (credible or otherwise), and proceeded to say he was wrong for making any assumptions using available data.
> > > > >
> > > > > How am I looking at the “wrong” post?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You expect me to provide evidence that you are looking at the wrong post? Go ahead and tell me how I can share that with you as it will be most intriguing. I most certainly did acknowledge it I’m afraid. Correction on your part: “Unavailable data”.
> > > >
> > > > I said anti-sprinters were in the minority as an opinion. Not a claimed fact on my part. Don’t assume.
> > >
> > >
> > > Simply direct me to the post I should be looking at?
> > >
> > > Regarding the post I quoted, you went back and edited where you stated anti-Sprinters were in the minority (adding in “I think”), but it still shows what you originally wrote in the quotes/responses. There were no indications that you meant anything other than a stated fact until you edited it.
> > >
> > > No, I meant available data. You can’t really form an opinion/make assumptions on a topic without any information on it. You pointing out that not all data is available only regurgitates the notion that it is an assumption (and I’d already stated it as such).
> >
> >
> > I didn’t edit anything. Your utterly fruitless to speak to. This isn’t even related to the original post. Rather it’s your own desire to prove your right and share a piece of your lacking knowledge. Just stop, if not I will.
>
>
> You did edit it though. I saw it when you initially posted it and if you look at others’ quoting that post, it shows that.
>
> You said I was looking at the wrong post, I went along with it and asked which post you’d like me to go off of, and you chose not to do so. I don’t see how I’m at fault, especially since you’re the one resorting to insults and “threatening” to drop the discussion.
and this is why it is urgent to get this issue brought to 343 attention and have them finalize the answer “to be or not to be”? Who you do really need to convince?