I think I know why Halo 5 was such a bad game. The reason is because Microsoft is too money-hungry to realize that making games isn’t just making games. You have to put thought into them and listen to what the public has to say. Another reason is that Halo wasn’t meant to go on after Halo 3. In my opinion, Halo Reach is the best halo game of all time, but again, that was made by Bungie. Now, I think 343 did a great job with some things, and have some great ideas. If they worked together they could create legendary games, I think.
If you think Reach is the best Halo of all time then H5 really shouldn’t be all that bad to you since they have quite a bit in common, especially game play wise… Reach had the loadouts with “armor abilities”… H5 has the “Spartan abilities”… In reach you had to grind out points to unlock cosmetics…in H5 you have to grind out point for packs, difference being you could pick exact stuff in reach rather than rng stuff in H5… Reach and H5 have the long xp grind for max xp rank… Now I will agree reach was the better game since it’s firefight was far superior to H5s and I kinda preferred the reach weapons(except the AR, H5 AR is perfect) and the reach maps are better than the H5 maps over all.
> 2535432007822525;1:
> The reason is because Microsoft is too money-hungry to realize that making games isn’t just making games. You have to put thought into them and listen to what the public has to say.
343 made H5, not MS corporate and if they listened to the public they would have to sort through a thousand different ideas about the same thing and the game would probably be a lot worse.
Topics that exist solely to hate on games doesn’t really serve much purpose, nor do they really promote healthy discussion. Probably worth at least giving the game a try before outright stating it’s bad 