> > That is exactly what I speak of, we put too much value in objects.
>
> Perhaps, but we put value in them to gain a better life from them, the more money you have the more you can spend it on, of course money is not the only thing to judge how good your life is but it’s one of them.
The thing is, it does not need to be that way. Putting value in something is fine. Letting something rule you is not. What bothers me more is it is the people of a lower intellect that care about objects that much.
Every year I see more people caring more about objects.
> Every year I see more people caring more about objects.
So what?
I really don’t see the problem in a man/woman having feelings and/or emotions for their intimate objects they paid for themselves. the good thing about having these objects is you wanted them and enjoy having them in your ideal morality of a nice life in society.
> I’ve been reading on paradoxes lately, here’s one for you.
>
> Can ‘‘God’’ create a rock that he can’t lift?
>
> If God can create a rock that He cannot lift, then God is not omnipotent. If God cannot create a rock so heavy that He cannot lift it, then God is not omnipotent. According to this argument, omnipotence is self-contradictory. Therefore, God cannot be omnipotent.
> > I’ve been reading on paradoxes lately, here’s one for you.
> >
> > Can ‘‘God’’ create a rock that he can’t lift?
> >
> > If God can create a rock that He cannot lift, then God is not omnipotent. If God cannot create a rock so heavy that He cannot lift it, then God is not omnipotent. According to this argument, omnipotence is self-contradictory. Therefore, God cannot be omnipotent.
>
> Not sure if we’re allowed to discuss this…
It’s an intresting paradox, don’t go into this religion debate stuff . . .
> edit
> Money is not required to have a good or happy life
No it does not, friends, family and your experiences in life can make a good and happy life, money does however play a part in making a good and happy life, the more money someone has the more they may be able to get out of their life, buy more things, go to more places etc.
> The thing is, it does not need to be that way. Putting value in something is fine. Letting something rule you is not. What bothers me more is it is the people of a lower intellect that care about objects that much.
I can agree with this, some people put too much into money and not enough into friends and family which I do find to be far more important.
> > > I’ve been reading on paradoxes lately, here’s one for you.
> > >
> > > Can ‘‘God’’ create a rock that he can’t lift?
> > >
> > > If God can create a rock that He cannot lift, then God is not omnipotent. If God cannot create a rock so heavy that He cannot lift it, then God is not omnipotent. According to this argument, omnipotence is self-contradictory. Therefore, God cannot be omnipotent.
> >
> > Not sure if we’re allowed to discuss this…
>
> It’s an intresting paradox, don’t go into this religion debate stuff . . .
It is an interesting topic, but I’m still not sure if we’re allowed to discuss it.
> > If you want my advice, if you don’t know whether you can talk about something or not, you should play it safe and assume you can’t.
>
> Pretty much this.
> > > Omg. It’s Married Mike!
> >
> > Wait, so there’s now a Mrs Sarcasmbully?
>
> The correct way to address him now is <mark>Mr Dr Sarcasmbully</mark>.
> I’ve been reading on paradoxes lately, here’s one for you.
>
> Can ‘‘God’’ create a rock that he can’t lift?
>
> If God can create a rock that He cannot lift, then God is not omnipotent. If God cannot create a rock so heavy that He cannot lift it, then God is not omnipotent. According to this argument, omnipotence is self-contradictory. Therefore, God cannot be omnipotent.
Not to get into a debate or anything, but…
Your paradox relies upon the assumption that omnipotence would limit itself. The very idea of omnipotence is unlimited power and capability. Therefore, if one possesses omnipotence,the capacity to create objects one is incapable of lifting would be attempting to place limits on something limitless, which is in and of itself impracticable.
Therefore, I conclude that omnipotence is capable of everything except limiting itself; this technically does not exclude omnipotence, as limitations would cause the omnipotence to be nullified.
> > > > Omg. It’s Married Mike!
> > >
> > > Wait, so there’s now a Mrs Sarcasmbully?
> >
> > The correct way to address him now is <mark>Mr Dr Sarcasmbully</mark>.
>
> Spot on
>
> Oh, and here’s my ring.
>
> And the beautiful bride and I.
>
> Thanks.
> > > > Ok… XB1 one the other hand, i also gotta save up for b/c of COD:AW and most importantly, MCC,
> > >
> > > So many games, so little money. How bout you toss a free Xbox my way?
> >
> > XD…no. You gotta save up for it, :).
> >
> > OT: just heard, Lord Richard Attenborough, who played John Hammond (Jurassic Park & The Lost World) passed away today.
>
> Just seen it on bbc news bloody good actor loved his films.
I agree…saw a few films with him and his performance
It appears we can’t play online, due to the recent hacking…oh well, might as well sit outside on this beautiful and gorgeous Monday morning listening to John Denver, drinking coffee, and monitoring mlp forums, for a while, squee
