> 2533274817408735;2867:
> > 2533274909329991;2864:
> > > 2533274817408735;2861:
> > > > 2533274909329991;2860:
> > > > > 2533274817408735;2858:
> > > > > > 2533274909329991;2857:
> > > > > > > 2533274817408735;2854:
> > > > > > > > 2533274909329991;2853:
> > > > > > > > > 2533274817408735;2852:
> > > > > > > > > > 2533274989460468;2850:
> > > > > > > > > > > 2533274817408735;2848:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2533274989460468;2847:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hey. So I just bought an xbox one and Halo 5 last night. After I spent all evening and most of the night downloading and installing updates, I played a couple matches. I went to bed and passed the controller to my brother who went on to play several matches and quit a good portion of them. I didnât play at all today since I was out of the house. I got on this evening I find myself with a 3 hour ban. Apparently he played even more while I was out today and got banned a few more times.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Now I know itâs my fault for letting him play, account is my responsibility, etc. Iâve put a passcode on my account to prevent this happening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I was wondering when the bans reset? Because next time I have any infraction (accidental suicide, team kill in swat) Iâm gonna be banned for 6+ hours. How long does it take for bans to cool back down to 10 minutes?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > What we know about the system is that it is supposed to look for patterns of infractions that arenât likely to be accidental (habitual quitting, suicides, betraying, etc.). According to the info on the first page, occasional infractions shouldnât trigger. Myself, for instance: Iâve never been banned, but Iâve been booted twice from Grifball for too many betrayals. However, after getting booted from those games (the boots were months apart), I was more careful in subsequent games, and even if I got another betrayal, it didnât boot me again. I can only assume something similar occurs with the banhammer.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > look, this system is no way as advanced enough to look for patterns as you say, and if this system could "look" it would clearly see that many people are not happy about being banned when this game lags badly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > if you are not sure then you need to stop defending something you are not sure about: All these detection algorithms you claim or heard from someone is totally absurd. All halo5 do is âlookâ at the rate of DNFâs then strike bans and there is nothing sophisticated about that, you need to stop trying to trick the community into thinking otherwise. Anyone with good common sense would know better.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And how do you know exactly how the system works? What hard evidence do you have to support your simplistic view of the system? By all means, enlighten us.
> >
> >
> > where the -Yoink- did you or your âso calledâ sophisticated algorithm detect me being dishonest?!? all you are doing here is paraphrasing everything I have stated but somehow you want to label me a liar. you are being so disrespectful, you should leave now because you are not resourceful here you are only defending a broken ban system. I clearly provided evidence that shows the ban system doesnât truly knows the reason for my DNFâs. even you admit to only speculate to me not being a habitual quitter; however two of us were disconnected simultaneously for some unknown reason, but then you speculated, a server or ISP disconnect issue with no basis of proof. you are very rude for attempting to tie me to dishonesty; there is something wrong with that
>
>
> So, I didnât call you anything. Again, I was commenting on us users limitation is what we can do here in the ban thread. We canât reverse bans. We can only use what info is available to keep each other honest (i.e. see if someone appears to be truthful or if they are full of BS). At no point did I even remotely begin to call you a liar. Where you got that idea is beyond me; feel free to point out where I call you a liar. And âdisrespectfulâ? Yeah, no. I responded to your post and gave it to you straight: that your one working video did not show the banhammer is incapable of detecting patterns. Where did you get the idea that I ever thought the banhammer could determine the reason behind a DNF? I never, ever said that. In fact, I and other helpers on Waypoint have pointed out numerous times that, in the eyes of the banhammer, all DNFs are equal. I never claimed that the banhammer knows the difference between a quit and a disconnect, because it probably doesnât. It detects patterns of DNFs, and betrayals, and idling, and suicides; detecting patterns is not the same thing as determining the reasons for something.
> For someone who, according to what you said earlier, has only ever had a 15 sec ban, you are getting worked up over nothing. I mean, anyone can read the posts you and I have made and see who is being rude to whom. I canât tell if you are trying to instigate or are legitimately unable to fully comprehend the meaning of my words, so Iâll just recap my points from my last post as plainly and clearly as I can:
> 1) Only one of your videos worked.
> 2) The working video showed severe lag before you disconnected; probably not a purposeful quit.
> 3) Cross referencing the video with your game history shows only 2 people did not finish that game. This suggests that it was not a major server problem.
> 4) The video did not prove anything about the pattern-detecting nature of the banhammer. It was just a video of someone lagging and then disconnecting.
> 5) Waypoint users are limited in what we can do. Banned players come here thinking they can get the bans reversed. This is not the case. For the most part, users here are only able to view history and draw conclusions based in limited info to keep each other honest. That doesnât mean Iâm calling you a liar; that means, in general, the first thing we check when someone has claimed an unjust ban is their game history to see if it checks out with what they say in their post. Sometimes, there are contradictions between what someone posts here and what their history looks like. Other times, the game history appears normal and without infraction.
> Is the banhammer perfect? No, of course not. It seems pretty strict when it ought not be and not strict enough in other times. Iâm not âdefendingâ the banhammer; I am merely using what information is available to try to determine the logic that could be behind why someone got banned. I do this because, while the banhammer isnât perfect, neither are people, and I am skeptical about anyone who posts here claiming that their ban is entirely not their fault.
> I suggest before responding (if youâre going to) that you take a deep breath and carefully, carefully, read over this reply a second time, and if you find anything Iâve said to be confusing, let me know.
folks, what we have here is a legitimate complaint from the ban system. However, chimera would rather write an entire essay in order to mask the obvious flaws in this ban system instead of simply acknowledging the flaws up front. I do understand the ban policy and also know that some players want to abuse the system. The ban hammer must be revised in order to accurately punish the real abusers (habitual quitters). however it currently destroys the gameplay for both quitters and victims as well. the sad way to handle this situation is to send regular members such as chimera and comedy here to act as âBan Policeâ with no solid proof for their accusations. and while you two think you are working for the greater good, you are actually destroying the halo community. I urge you two to gain knowledge and stop now, yes we want functional running servers, full teams with no quitters; but at the same time we donât want to diminish the halo community. Chimera, remember you came to me with that âkeep you honestâ -Yoink- âwell designed inaccurate accusations.â is a sophisticated category of âfoolish wrongful blameââŚ