> 2533274803377538;2761:
> > 2533274795123910;2741:
> > > 2783921555387904;2738:
> > >
>
>
> Theyâre a bunch of -Yoinks!-, thereâs nothing we can do anymore, they arenât like bungie
Excuse me?
Bungie did ban for quits, and if memory serves they had quite sever punishments when you did other things than quitting and disconnecting. Boosting was quite severely looked at, AFKing as well, or betraying.
Someone here, or in another thread, said that Bungie themselves had an official âwhy was I bannedâ thread that in which you could appeal your ban, and got told for real why you were banned. Were you to try to get rid of your ban and proven guilty your ban would get doubled. Mind you, this was done officially for everyone to see. I do remember a Bungie ban thread but I never ventured in there that much.
Thereâs supposidly one developer demanding sincere apology videos from perma banned players in order to be released back in.
Titanfall matches cheaters vs cheaters.
DotA 2 throws you into lower priority matches where thereâs an artificial search time increase and no rewards, if I remember correctly. They can also ban you from communicating if you misbehave etc.
No, i343 is not one of those companies, they made their own decisions, but theyâre far from the only develiper out there that take different misconduct seriously. They chose to do it the way they chose to.
(Basically every single ToS / ToU is the same except for some phrases and words depending on company, but Bungie too could ban you permanently just for the laugh, never tell you why and have no legal bearing because youâve accepted it)
Is there something we can do? Sure there is, for starters, those coming here could for instance not flame anyone or anything, and in the cases of contradictory statements (3 day ban for first quit / DC ever ) provide some proof to that.
Second, many here seem to be willing to play against others who quit and such, so if there was enough support from those affected it could perhaps alter the type of punishment, âpick your poisonâ. Or even a combination of the two systems depending on player population who are flagged etc.
I could start yet another thread on the subject but would need to be sure itâs not going to be locked because this is the only ban-related thread allowed. Yes, I have suggested this many times, since before Reach launched.