A 1v1 doesn’t prove that your definition of a nerf is wrong and you asked for proof of you acting like you’re superior so me and the person you’re asking for proof have said all the person has to do is quote a few things from this very topic
Neither of which requires a 1v1
Like i said you’re still wrong cry about it no 1v1 is going to change that
Nah I’ve given up on the nerf thing.
I just want to drag you across a few maps with the weapons you say are useless to prove a point.
EDIT: But, not tonight. Gotta’ help a friend with voice training and therapy. Trans stuff. I’m responsible.
Never once did i say they were useless and im sure the other guy didn’t as well
add that to the list of things you’re wrong about
I’m pretty late to the party. I’ve only been using the Mangler for a few weeks.
But it’s clearly a cheesy kill.
And it won’t have anything to do with a bunch of pros in their ivory tower somewhere.
343 will be looking at their game data and see that the mangler is performing above it’s station. So they either swap it with a power weapon on the map - or nerf back it back inside it’s paygrade.
There is no way it could stay as is.
I’d love to indulge in alittle 1v1 :3
I’m the only person obliging to do this 1v1 duel, since you like to stat-track, it’ll be your pleasure to see my numbers. I’m on MnK, no aim assist magnetism anchoring in my rawest performance, still wanna do it :3?
Onyx? Sure, why not. I’ll probably get my **** pushed in. I guess invite me to a match.
pog, message me on Xbox, we’ll talk out the 1v1 GA rules
Messages sent, let’s do this.
People that didn’t think the mangler needed a nerf were either okay with it being hyper broken, or didn’t know that you don’t try to 3 shot people with the mangler.
Gun was busted. It’s still too strong in competitive play, and going by the comp players I’ve talked to it will still not be used in professional and competitive play.
Well, another time I guess.
Pretty sure whatever they’re doing is not working lol.
Mint Blitz too? I heard a rumor that he might be on something. Kill junkies give halo a bad name.
whether it’s a player with skill or not, casuals never get a break from either the weak or strong. I don’t see the meek & wise being listen to anytime soon. If 343 really had time to listen, their consistency wouldn’t take an increasing amount of time to basically delay features & refuse some duck tape & paper clips to release lesser features than all older releases combined…!? They could of done a true reclaimer series after what they did different but management was never their strong suit.
1: the 10% decrease is across the board meaning the bulldog and heatwave will also see this decrease. we haven’t play the change yet so we don’t know how this will affect them. they may all be reduced to this two shot state.
2: the BR has a higher rate of fire than the mangler. you can fire two bursts from the BR and melee in the same time you would fire two shots from the mangler.
then why make this change?
They will not. I guarantee it. One shot from the bulldog or heatwave will drop shields at point blank, and that will be enough to take a foe out in a melee.
So you aren’t a competitive player who has any idea what they’re talking about, got it.
EDIT: Let me explain it to you. Two shots from a mangler will drop shields. Two shots from a BR will not. 2 shot mangler 1 shot BR is less squeezes in less time than 4 squeezes than a BR and it’s easier than a 4shot to land if your mangler aim is half decent.
The BR has a faster RoF, but the Mangler does more damage. Drop or swap, a BR to finish after two mangler shots is STRICTLY faster.
Because they wanted to normalize the gun somewhat and make it not the strongest in the game which as it stands, it is basically.
Right now having a mangler means you win every close up battle, and every mid range battle.
That’s not okay for a pistol.
Post nerf, winning every mid range battle is still too strong but it’s a start.
i’m talking about close range/melee. 343 said that the br will remain a 2 shot melee to kill. meaning it will now out perform the mangler in CQC. the mangler is meant to be a CQC weapon, but now a medium range burst fire rifle is going to beat it.
where is the logic in that?
Because it was too good, as @Liquid_Execute said.
It was overpowered.
it needed adjustment.
But no, a BR does not beat it. Have you been hearing anything said by us?