You’re having that rare, intelligent forum discussion with a group of interesting posters, and some random guy posts this:
“Remember, your ideas for Halo 4 are a minority opinion. Most Halo players don’t even come to these forums, so 343 can’t cater to your personal ideas and leave everyone else out who isn’t even on here.”
Let’s actually analyze this. Knocking an idea with “it’s just one person’s opinion” sounds fair and reasonable, but is it?
First off, is there some magic number of agreement before an idea is valid? If so, what is that number? I’ve seen a dozen people agree with a good idea on here. Should it be a hundred? A thousand? When does an idea become “for everyone?”
A thousand people may believe the earth is flat–are they right? One person can discover a vaccine–is he wrong?
Think about this: how many people work at 343? A hundred? Three hundred? They are actually making Halo 4. Are their ideas for the game invalid because they don’t have a majority of Halo players signing off on them?
The fact is, a vocal minority guides every creative project–beginning with the small group that makes it.
Then, loyal fans. We are not better/smarter than those who don’t post here–but because we have an ability to express our ideas about Halo 4, we probably “represent” ideas that regular players have, but don’t have the time or skill to get across.
I’ve seen threads derail over who has the right to have a good idea for Halo, which is a shame. Unfocused ideas tend to die out. Good ideas gain momentum. A forum like this is where it happens. Your ideas on Halo 4 can be valid, even though they are literally a minority opinion. In fact, it is usually a minority of dedicated people who change things for the better.
What do you think? Do these forums represent a cross-section of average player ideas? Are we a biased minority? If so, is being a biased minority a bad thing? Or, should 343 not listen to us at all, and take inspiration only from its own team?