It is probably harder than we know to add a new flying vehicle.
> 2533274875982754;1:
> It is probably harder than we know to add a new flying vehicle.
Coding is hard, yes. But you know what you shouldn’t do? Get a job in programming if you want to complain about how hard programming is.
343 has chosen to do this, and now we got gipped on a Falcon deal. Memories of Reach, not Memories of Halo 5. Js.
I think 343 should hire someone from Bungie just to add a UNSC flying vehicle.
Because from what we’ve seen with Halo 4 and 5, it’s too hard for them to do.
Yea, especially with all the crazy stuff we have to work with now… we rage at vehicles now? Can you imagine spawning in a slow large falcon just to get splazered out of the sky?
Well, if there isn’t one in hog wild then I will honestly consider leaving, I’m getting sick of all of 343s incompetences
People seriously need to stop with the whole “making games is hard” argument. Yes, programming is hard, for those of us who don’t know how to do it. The people who work at 343 are, by their own admittance, industry veterans. People who have 20+ years of experience in game development. These aren’t a bunch of fresh college graduates or indie devs. They’re apparently some of the best in the industry.
They know what they’re doing, stop treating them like children. If something is “too hard” for them, then they have no business making Halo, let alone video games in general.
> 2533274856723140;3:
> I think 343 should hire someone from Bungie just to add a UNSC flying vehicle.
>
> Because from what we’ve seen with Halo 4 and 5, it’s too hard for them to do.
Based on bungies current practices Wed get half a Falcon and get charged 20 dollars for the rest of it.
> 2533274792942658;7:
> > 2533274856723140;3:
> > I think 343 should hire someone from Bungie just to add a UNSC flying vehicle.
> >
> > Because from what we’ve seen with Halo 4 and 5, it’s too hard for them to do.
>
>
> Based on bungies current practices Wed get half a Falcon and get charged 20 dollars for the rest of it.
*Activision.
Bungie creates full games, Activision chops them up to add them later as DLC. Bungie’s not stupid, they wouldn’t leave code for their first two expansions on the base game disk unless they weren’t supposed to be expansions.
Tbh they’ve been having trouble keeping it together since Activision stepped in. What does that say about the cause of the company’s current state?
> 2533274856723140;8:
> > 2533274792942658;7:
> > > 2533274856723140;3:
> > > I think 343 should hire someone from Bungie just to add a UNSC flying vehicle.
> > >
> > > Because from what we’ve seen with Halo 4 and 5, it’s too hard for them to do.
> >
> >
> > Based on bungies current practices Wed get half a Falcon and get charged 20 dollars for the rest of it.
>
>
> *Activision.
>
> Bungie creates full games, Activision chops them up to add them later as DLC. Bungie’s not stupid, they wouldn’t leave code for their first two expansions on the base game disk unless they weren’t supposed to be expansions.
>
> Tbh they’ve been having trouble keeping it together since Activision stepped in. What does that say about the cause of the company’s current state?
This.
It’s funny how all these 343 fans will blame Bungie for the mishaps with Destiny, but when 343 messes up they blame Microsoft for “rushing” them.
They don’t seem to understand that it’s the publishers who make these types of decisions. Either that, or they’re full blown 343 fanboys that are too blinded to see any fault with 343 and have an irrational hate for Bungie.
It’s a matter of “You hyped yourself up for a vehicle you didn’t know for sure was gonna be there. This is your own fault.”.