Did you see the comment about suppressing fire, 2 posts before yours?
False. Most of the time in my matches the one with (by far) the most kills is not the one with the highest accuracy. Because there is so much more to the game then just accuracy.
If youâre missing so much then yeah youâre really bad
Grenades, melees, and melee weapons do not contribute to accuracy ratings. Vehicles do. So there are more variables to consider.
It isnât likely that the top player is going to have low accuracy in a normal game.
Accuracy is important but for gametypes like SWAT it is also relative. If you hit all your shots with the BR in SWAT (just one kill per shot so not including multi kills) then the best accuracy you can get is 33.33%. That is the accuracy ceiling to aim for in SWATâŚno pun intended.
99% accuracy is being bad?
The problem with tactical slayers accuracy isnât the stats. Itâs the broken aiming mechanics, broken aim assist, and poor hit registration.
This is why no one will remember your name
Thatâs the opposite of what I just said
I didnât realise the first bullet hit counts but the others are then guaranteed misses, thus negatively impacting your accuracy rating. I guess it makes sense in one way, but wouldnât missed bullets in each burst count against you in other modes too? In which case Iâm not sure if they can really change anything here
Your own accuracy should matter most, not the ingames bad accuracy stats
Really?
Well itâs one answer to two scenarios, both of which have a degree of misses to the accuracy.
If youâre artificially boosting your accuracy against bots itâs not the same as missing against real players, I donât understand the comparison