HOW do players switch their vote before the game starts I can’t do it
> HOW do players switch their vote before the game starts I can’t do it
You can’t. This was changed due to lots of trolling from other players in Reach.
I know that tell the players Im playing against on team objective???
They should have done it like MW3 where once you vote you have to wait a second or two before you can vote again.
> They should have done it like MW3 where once you vote you have to wait a second or two before you can vote again.
I would actually prefer the return of the veto system.
> > They should have done it like MW3 where once you vote you have to wait a second or two before you can vote again.
>
> I would actually prefer the return of the veto system.
As would I. I can’t stand the voting system. It leads to lack of variety.
> > > They should have done it like MW3 where once you vote you have to wait a second or two before you can vote again.
> >
> > I would actually prefer the return of the veto system.
>
> As would I. I can’t stand the voting system. It leads to lack of variety.
Agreed, there is something like 22 maps in this game…even if you take out paid dlc…there are still 13 maps…yet 4 maps make up 50% of my games.
Veto system is best I’ve seen from any game
It’s lag, really bad lag. If players have a poor connection to the host it may take several seconds for their first vote to register on their screen. Until their first vote registers, they can switch as often as they like.
If you encounter this, I would use it as an opportunity to get out of dodge since you can still back out.
> > HOW do players switch their vote before the game starts I can’t do it
>
> You can’t. This was changed due to lots of trolling from other players in Reach.
I liked that though 
especially if I accidentally click on a map I don’t want
> > > They should have done it like MW3 where once you vote you have to wait a second or two before you can vote again.
> >
> > I would actually prefer the return of the veto system.
>
> As would I. I can’t stand the voting system. It leads to lack of variety.
But with the veto system you can get those wonderful map choices, like Team Slayer ARs on Valhalla, or Snowbound. I like Halo Reach’s system best, but if they tweaked it so the same maps never show up twice or more in a row that would be great.
Immediately after my previous post I got stuck in a game of Team Slayer ARs on Valhalla. My point is proven.
> > > > They should have done it like MW3 where once you vote you have to wait a second or two before you can vote again.
> > >
> > > I would actually prefer the return of the veto system.
> >
> > As would I. I can’t stand the voting system. It leads to lack of variety.
>
> But with the veto system you can get those wonderful map choices, like Team Slayer ARs on Valhalla, or Snowbound. I like Halo Reach’s system best, but if they tweaked it so the same maps never show up twice or more in a row that would be great.
That’s simply a matter of grouping maps to gametypes better; once done, the Veto system makes for much more refreshing gameplay. I, as well as many others, would be tempted to vote for various maps/modes that I like often. The thing is, it burns you out.
I like the idea of drawing a random game. It puts you into matches you might not otherwise have tried. When the thing you like the most does come up, it’s a treat. Then you go back to enjoying other aspects of the game. THAT helps the replay value.
The Black Ops system is pretty good. So is the veto system. Either one works for me.
Veto was fun, I agree. But sometimes you would get sick of having some lame gametype come up and you didn’t know it would be there before hand.
Too many people like to switch their vote to win what they want.