Can we have a social ffa playlist? Could include Regicide, KotH, Oddball etc. Could be fun and also a good warm-up before ranked ffa. I know there is also an update coming to ffa so I’ll guess we’ll have to find out what’s happening with it. Thanks for reading.
Super Social FFA Fiesta
> 2535416922794324;2:
> Super Social FFA Fiesta
Yassss 
In all honesty I don’t see FFA being social. Well we can make it look social by removing all stat-tracking on social playlists. Does that satisfy you?
> 2533275008181400;4:
> In all honesty I don’t see FFA being social. Well we can make it look social by removing all stat-tracking on social playlists. Does that satisfy you?
What do you mean? Why can’t ffa be social? If team slayer can, why can’t ffa? It’s just a place where people don’t have to tryhard for ranks and stats and can include slightly less competitive gamemodes such as what I stated.
> 2535428038990187;5:
> > 2533275008181400;4:
> > In all honesty I don’t see FFA being social. Well we can make it look social by removing all stat-tracking on social playlists. Does that satisfy you?
>
> What do you mean? Why can’t ffa be social? If team slayer can, why can’t ffa? It’s just a place where people don’t have to tryhard for ranks and stats and can include slightly less competitive gamemodes such as what I stated.
What I’m trying to say is we remove stat-tracking on current/upcoming social playlists so those competitive/sewaties/tryhards don’t go to social playlists just to buff their stats. I’m cool with competitive/sweaties/tryhards going into social playlists so they can have some fun but not there trying to buff their stats.
> 2535416922794324;2:
> Super Social FFA Fiesta
Reminds me of a game I played on the Customs Browser a while back.
12 People.
Free For All.
Super Fiesta gametype.
Lockout remake map.
1 second respawns.
The madness that ensued was actually pretty interesting.
> 2533275008181400;6:
> > 2535428038990187;5:
> > > 2533275008181400;4:
> > > In all honesty I don’t see FFA being social. Well we can make it look social by removing all stat-tracking on social playlists. Does that satisfy you?
> >
> > What do you mean? Why can’t ffa be social? If team slayer can, why can’t ffa? It’s just a place where people don’t have to tryhard for ranks and stats and can include slightly less competitive gamemodes such as what I stated.
>
> What I’m trying to say is we remove stat-tracking on current/upcoming social players so those competitive/sewaties/tryhards don’t just go to social playlists just to buff their stats. I’m cool with competitive/sweaties/tryhards going into social playlists so they can have some fun but not there trying to buff their stats.
I know what you meant, and I agree (I’ve even made threads about it), I’m just saying that there shouldn’t just be one FFA gamemode at least in social anyway since the gamemodes mentioned above mostly wouldn’t be great competitiveness wise. Sorry for the confusion 
> 2533274850869596;7:
> > 2535416922794324;2:
> > Super Social FFA Fiesta
>
> Reminds me of a game I played on the Customs Browser a while back.
>
> 12 People.
> Free For All.
> Super Fiesta gametype.
> Lockout remake map.
> 1 second respawns.
>
> The madness that ensued was actually pretty interesting.
Yeah that sounds cool but to me that should stay in customs or if anything, make a separate gamemode in super fiesta simply called FFA Super Fiesta. Definitely not in a social FFA playlist. Although I would like a regular fiesta gamemode in Social FFA.
> 2535428038990187;8:
> > 2533275008181400;6:
> > > 2535428038990187;5:
> > > > 2533275008181400;4:
> > > > In all honesty I don’t see FFA being social. Well we can make it look social by removing all stat-tracking on social playlists. Does that satisfy you?
> > >
> > > What do you mean? Why can’t ffa be social? If team slayer can, why can’t ffa? It’s just a place where people don’t have to tryhard for ranks and stats and can include slightly less competitive gamemodes such as what I stated.
> >
> > What I’m trying to say is we remove stat-tracking on current/upcoming social players so those competitive/sewaties/tryhards don’t just go to social playlists just to buff their stats. I’m cool with competitive/sweaties/tryhards going into social playlists so they can have some fun but not there trying to buff their stats.
>
> I know what you meant, and I agree (I’ve even made threads about it), I’m just saying that there shouldn’t just be one FFA gamemode at least in social anyway since the gamemodes mentioned above mostly wouldn’t be great competitiveness wise. Sorry for the confusion
Wouldn’t make sense for social FFA to be just Slayer. I’m pretty confident if social FFA ever comes to mind, it’ll include objective gamemodes along with Slayer.
I think that would be fun but let’s be honest all the sweats would still play social
> 2535462450434439;11:
> I think that would be fun but let’s be honest all the sweats would still play social
Depends what you mean by sweat, people who are just really good at the game or people who just sweat to boost their stats. Stats for social should even be invisible, or separate from stats in ranked play.
> 2533275008181400;10:
> > 2535428038990187;8:
> > > 2533275008181400;6:
> > > > 2535428038990187;5:
> > > > > 2533275008181400;4:
> > > > > In all honesty I don’t see FFA being social. Well we can make it look social by removing all stat-tracking on social playlists. Does that satisfy you?
> > > >
> > > > What do you mean? Why can’t ffa be social? If team slayer can, why can’t ffa? It’s just a place where people don’t have to tryhard for ranks and stats and can include slightly less competitive gamemodes such as what I stated.
> > >
> > > What I’m trying to say is we remove stat-tracking on current/upcoming social players so those competitive/sewaties/tryhards don’t just go to social playlists just to buff their stats. I’m cool with competitive/sweaties/tryhards going into social playlists so they can have some fun but not there trying to buff their stats.
> >
> > I know what you meant, and I agree (I’ve even made threads about it), I’m just saying that there shouldn’t just be one FFA gamemode at least in social anyway since the gamemodes mentioned above mostly wouldn’t be great competitiveness wise. Sorry for the confusion
>
> Wouldn’t make sense for social FFA to be just Slayer. I’m pretty confident if social FFA ever comes to mind, it’ll include objective gamemodes along with Slayer.
Hope so. If Social FFA ever is a thing that is.
> 2535428038990187;12:
> > 2535462450434439;11:
> > I think that would be fun but let’s be honest all the sweats would still play social
>
> Depends what you mean by sweat, people who are just really good at the game or people who just sweat to boost their stats. Stats for social should even be invisible, or separate from stats in ranked play.
I just meant good players who play to win in social. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing I’m just saying it’ll happen most likely
> 2535416922794324;2:
> Super Social FFA Fiesta
O h g o d. OP, I agree, and the general FFA population has been depressingly low lately.
> 2535462450434439;14:
> > 2535428038990187;12:
> > > 2535462450434439;11:
> > > I think that would be fun but let’s be honest all the sweats would still play social
> >
> > Depends what you mean by sweat, people who are just really good at the game or people who just sweat to boost their stats. Stats for social should even be invisible, or separate from stats in ranked play.
>
> I just meant good players who play to win in social. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing I’m just saying it’ll happen most likely
Are good players not supposed to try and win?
> 2535428038990187;16:
> > 2535462450434439;14:
> > > 2535428038990187;12:
> > > > 2535462450434439;11:
> > > > I think that would be fun but let’s be honest all the sweats would still play social
> > >
> > > Depends what you mean by sweat, people who are just really good at the game or people who just sweat to boost their stats. Stats for social should even be invisible, or separate from stats in ranked play.
> >
> > I just meant good players who play to win in social. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing I’m just saying it’ll happen most likely
>
> Are good players not supposed to try and win?
Lowkey said it’s not bad a thing^^^ just saying it’ll happen.
I’ve been wanting this for a while. I usually don’t like playing ranked playlists, but I am forced to do so when it comes to FFA. I think adding a social playlist along with the gametypes you mentioned would be great. My only concern is is that there are a lot of playlists already, and it would spread the population thinner than it is already.
> 2535417176108194;18:
> I’ve been wanting this for a while. I usually don’t like playing ranked playlists, but I am forced to do so when it comes to FFA. I think adding a social playlist along with the gametypes you mentioned would be great. My only concern is is that there are a lot of playlists already, and it would spread the population thinner than it is already.
Yeah, its unfortunate all of these playlists came so late into the games life, if not it would have probably been very viable, but I still would say that it is worth it and would probably be a better playlist than triple team especially if it comes with some old game modes brought back.
> 2533275008181400;4:
> In all honesty I don’t see FFA being social. Well we can make it look social by removing all stat-tracking on social playlists. Does that satisfy you?
I’m all for this. Either no stats or a completely different set of stats for social/casual. Maybe some tryhards wouldn’t feel so good bragging about all the casuals they kill. Then again, maybe they would. Who knows? What I’m pretty sure of is that the stats of players at the top of the curve improve a lot playing social and the players at the bottom have a corresponding nosedive.