It was an opinion piece and you acted like your opinion won. It was a question of whether or not the monetary contributions of people who purchased the campaign should be considered in armor obtainment.
You made it a win or lose when it was a yes or no, and even stated that it was misinformation when it was about interpretation.
You were never going to win because it wasnât about winning. But I knew by your nature which you quickly showed that youâll think youâre a winner. So yeah Iâll burn the topic if a useless commenter is going to linger
I wouldnât say you successfully argued against them, but Iâm not going to try to prove youâre a troll, so Iâll take your word for that, even though you didnât actually say youâre not trolling.
Ah yes. You still think youâre winning⌠when that wasnât the point⌠well continue to prove me right by not realizing you canât win with an opinion here
Well at least the bootlicker has finally decided he licked the boot clean enough to win. Shame he didnât realize noone was trying to take his boot from him
20 bucks for basic colors too. Like who at 353 was like yes this is. Brilliant letâs only give them 7 of the basic colors and sell them the other ones⌠At a premium price, but I guess there are some who thinks thatâs logical.
Hell Fortnites cosmetics options are better. At least when you buy a weapon skin is works across all weapons
The cash shop shouldnât exist. They choose the battle pass as their monetization method on top of keeping the campaign price the same despite it not including multiplayer. There is no need to triple dip.
The shop should exist, but the shop should never have anything that isnât in the Battle Pass.
Basically, the shop should just be there for people who want to more quickly get specific items without the Battle Pass.
It should also be there as a way for free players to buy things with in-game currency if they ever add that.
