What on Earth was 343 thinking when they designed the Sentinel BR scope? There’s too much light refracting on the lens, making it nearly impossible to get a clear target on enemies. Why not just stick with the longshot BR which sports the DMR scope?
Fortunately, there’s lots of alternatives. I myself enjoy it.
I hate that! I have to find a dark spots to shoot from or the damn glare from the scope get so annoying. It would be the best scope if it wasn’t for that glare.
I agree, I prefer the Longshot BR for a long range rifle. As you said there is a huge glare on the scope and I honestly just don’t like the BR zooming in twice, it just doesn’t feel right.
Who needs the Sentinel or Longshot BR when you can have that sweet sweet classic BR anyways?
There is a lot of light, but it’s not a scope I use often.
> 2533274913936758;5:
> Who needs the Sentinel or Longshot BR when you can have that sweet sweet classic BR anyways?
The classic is the best for sure that sight is just perfect. Also love the recon DMR.
> 2533274885506317;7:
> > 2533274913936758;5:
> > Who needs the Sentinel or Longshot BR when you can have that sweet sweet classic BR anyways?
>
>
> The classic is the best for sure that sight is just perfect.
Mhm. Less recoil than the longshot, more user-friendly than the sentinel. And the scope looks cool.
> 2533274913936758;5:
> Who needs the Sentinel or Longshot BR when you can have that sweet sweet classic BR anyways?
Unfortunately I don’t have that REQ yet, I’m dying to get my hands on it, though.